liquidXalpha @liquidXalpha

@Support I just temporarily got locked out after posting. I was able to pass a recaptcha test. I’d like to know what about my account was flagged as suspicious

@Jake__Wujastyk I keep going back and forth on whether I need to consider selling CCs or hold for a rally. What catalysts are you seeing that made you buy yours back?

Super happy I sold covered $55 November calls on my entire $IREN position today. Going to keep harvesting while this stock remains motionless with no catalysts to speak of!

If you find yourself questioning your whole investment strategy every time you open X, ask yourself: Did I do my DD and build enough independent conviction for my thesis to stand on its own? If so… just close X. That’s it, that’s the post. $IREN $CIFR $ONDS bitcoin:native

@RKLBPerson @itschrisray I bought it in the low and mid 20s thinking I had a great entry 😅

Internal “hall monitor” models are used to basically monitor new LLM iterations to ensure they aren’t cheating. Cheating = skirting the explicit instructions and boundaries they are given in order to win. All they really are incentivized to do is accomplish their objective, and receive negative feedback if they fail. Thus, they look for any way to win. The insinuation with the second half of the image: people watching this closely now understand that the LLM models being developed have become so adept at fooling their monitors that they no longer register as “cheating.” Meaning they are deliberately hiding their methods to accomplish their objectives. If we don’t know how an LLM gets to a conclusion, we lose control of them. Extrapolate to sensitive security situations and infrastructure systems, we will never know if an LLM is dangerously involved in any certain way until it’s way too late. This is what the Doomers are focused on. Hope that helps

Internal “hall monitor” models are used to basically monitor new LLM iterations to ensure they aren’t cheating. Cheating = skirting the explicit instructions and boundaries they are given in order to win. All they really are incentivized to do is accomplish their objective, and receive negative feedback if they fail. Thus, they look for any way to win. The insinuation with the second half of the image: people watching this closely now understand that the LLM models being developed have become so adept at fooling their monitors that they no longer register as “cheating.” Meaning they are deliberately hiding their methods to accomplish their objectives. If we don’t know how an LLM gets to a conclusion, we lose control of them. Extrapolate to sensitive security situations and infrastructure systems, we will never know if an LLM is dangerously involved in any certain way until it’s way too late. This is what the Doomers are focused on.

@NWSWPC

@BMSInvests Where does $AXON Dedrone fit into this competitive picture?

@datacentrebull I just really love watching people apply swing-trading mentality to long-term business capital risk and growth strategies. Everyone expects $NBIS -style short term price action from deliberate, strategic, capital-intensive physical asset businesses. Completely missing the point.

@RichLassiterMD I actually think this will be nice for STRK. Ive held STRC through the downswing and now considering rotating to STRK. A little more persistent buying pressure mixed with the start of some BTC/MSTR upswing would be very welcomed.

@mudirshin CEO Tyler Page made a great distinction: don’t compare to neocloud financing and risk profile. Different approaches, different economics.

Thank you for delving into the nuance. I’ve held $CIFR for some time and have loved watching the progression of the company. The peanut gallery can only see things from a limited, outside perspective. Important distinction between your financing/risk model and a neocloud’s structure as well.

With the muted reaction to $CIFR locking in a long term current-rate contract extension at Barber Lake, I think this further venerates $IREN and their strategy of waiting to contract until the last minute. Time will tell if $CIFR is just muted due to macro (or institutional “positioning” 😒) or if that was a long-term mistake. I have held and continue to hold both due to their slightly different strategies. Bullish on both. Interesting times indeed.

@ChairmansLedger Since they are BTM, how does ERCOT evaluate connection? My concern is their queue in the ERCOT Batch 0 process. $IREN was fine, $CIFR got caught up in a “studied vs base” load distinction fight which I would argue hurt the stock’s chance of a breakout last week.

@michaelsikand What’s your take on where $AVEX fits into this picture?

Shoot for a half marathon! I believe it’s the perfect race. You can train for one even with a busy schedule, gives you and excuse to travel somewhere cool, and it’s much easier recovery. When you hit 13.1 miles on your 26.2 Journey, you realize things about yourself. Best to find those things out at the finish line than the halfway point 😁

@ChairmansLedger @mikealfred I sincerely enjoyed this exchange

@mtkonczal @TheStalwart I, for one, am just glad the adults are in the room and are handling everything so I don’t have to worry about this. *checks earpiece* ok… coming live… it turns out there are actually zero adults and greater than zero people who needed help putting their pants on today