Krish @krishwhi

The Western Elites don't need you to fear this man because hes been lying to you. They need you to fear him because he's been telling you the truth about them all along.

Remote work should be maxed out. It has reduced car accidents, insurance costs, pollution, road rage, lowered the cost of living for millions, by allowing them to live places with less insane prices. It's just win after win.

Every time I hear Putin speak, I am convinced I am listening to a man who has dedicated his entire life to his country, with all his heart. Every time I see our governments, I am convinced they act solely for their own benefit. Morally, ethically, and as a civilization, we have failed. We carry nothing within us that serves the common good. Our increasingly self-centered society is leading us ever further toward ruin.

Instead of the government mandating digital ID and surveillance on us, we should be mandating digital ID and surveillance on the government to monitor how they are spending our money and what they are discussing with their corporate lobbying cronies. We fund them. They serve us.

@donalt x.com/pumptiresWIN/s…

@DeFiZion How is 5996 able to make a withdrawal that pushes his vault below the collateralization ratio? Doesn't the protocol prevent this?

@pdimitrakos @krakenfx x.com/whankfrite/sta…

Frank White @WhankFrite

2 years ago

PulseChain is consistently near the top of dexscreener's chain list, i'm baffled none of the top CEXs have announced listing (yet)

26 61 456 9K 8

@PulseRecycled @RichardHeartWin @realFirebun "Note: Existing stakes made directly to the HEX contract cannot later be changed or encapsulated."

PUTIN: "I will repeat again: the ruling elites of the United States and its satellites are behind the tragedy of the Palestinians, the massacre in the Middle East in general, the conflict in Ukraine, and many other conflicts in the world – in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and so on. This has become obvious to everyone. It is they who install their military bases everywhere, who use military force on every pretext and without any pretext, who send weapons to conflict areas. They are also channeling financial resources, including to Ukraine and the Middle East, and fueling hatred in Ukraine and the Middle East. They are not achieving results on the battlefield, so they want to split us from within, as far as Russia is concerned, to weaken us and sow confusion. They do not want Russia to participate in solving any international or regional problems, including in the Middle East settlement. They are not satisfied at all when someone does not act or speak exactly as they are instructed. They believe only in their own exclusivity, in being allowed to do anything. They do not need durable peace in the Holy Land; they need constant chaos in the Middle East. Consequently, they are trying hard to discredit countries that are insisting on an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, on ending the bloodshed, and that are ready to make a real contribution to resolving the crisis, rather than parasitizing on it. They are even attacking, ostracizing and trying to discredit the UN and the clear position of the global community. I would like to note that, unlike the West, our approaches towards the situation in the Middle East have always lacked mercenary interests, intrigues and double standards. We have stated and continue to openly state our position, which does not change every year. The key to resolving the conflict lies in establishing a sovereign and independent Palestinian state, a full-fledged Palestinian state."

Russell Brand got too big, told too much truth, challenged too many narratives, pissed off too many powerful people and has a message that is too uniting

Fifteen questions Americans can ask themselves that are more useful than "What presidential candidate should we vote for?": 1. Why does nothing change no matter who we vote for? 2. Why does US foreign policy always continue along the same trajectory regardless of the president's party or platform? 3. What keeps our voting population split right down the middle into two political factions of equal size, with neither side ever gaining enough of a majority to democratically change society in any meaningful way? 4. Why does the stalemate described in #3 always seem to benefit the rich, the powerful, and the war-horny? 5. Why is it that the most consequential US government policies like plutocratic influence, privatization, globalization, ecocidal capitalism and nuclear brinkmanship are never on the ballot? Why do these things keep happening, against our interests, without our ever voting for them or electing anyone who campaigned on the pledge to enact them? 6. If our federal government's behavior never changes no matter who we elect, could it be that there are other bodies involved in government policy-setting whom we did not elect, and who remain in positions of influence regardless of the comings and goings of our official elected government? 7. If the above is the case, then who is it? Who's really calling the shots in this country? 8. Could it be that everything we've been told about our country, our government, our political processes and our world is untrue? 9. If so, what are the implications of the fact that our schools and our media have been feeding us lies since we were small? 10. What forces would be responsible for keeping all these lies flowing throughout our society? What might keep an ostensibly free press spinning more or less the same lies throughout the western world day after day, year after year, generation after generation? 11. Is it possible that our entire electoral system is a sham designed to give the public the illusion of control so that they'll let oligarchs and empire managers run the country undisturbed? 12. If the electoral system is a sham, then how do we enact the changes we so desperately need? 13. Is it possible that there are other ways to effect change in the United States which don't involve casting a pretend vote in a fake election? 14. Could it be that those other means of forcing change are precisely what the charade of casting pretend votes in fake elections is meant to divert us from? 15. Should we perhaps spend less energy bickering about who should get sworn into the White House a year and a half from now, and more energy examining other possible avenues toward advancing meaningful change?

We really don't pay enough attention to the fact that all the most influential media platforms are owned and operated by extremely wealthy people who have every motive to keep us all focused on culture wars and electoral politics so we don't focus on class war and direct action.

Imagine if you earned 31.35 times what you earn now, and everything still costs what it currently does. How much more would you be able to afford? How much less financial stress would you have? Now, imagine if you had always earned that much more. And your parents earned about 20 times more than they did. And your grandparents earned about 10 times more. Imagine the generational wealth you'd have now. That's how much the Federal Reserve has robbed you. How did they do this? By printing out more money, without tying it to anything of value. When more money is in circulation, chasing the same products, it takes more of that money to buy those products. That's why the increase in prices is called inflation, because it's caused by the inflation of the money supply. Why did they do this? Because they made sure that they, and their powerful friends, get the lion's share of all that newly-printed money. Remember in 2020, when they handed out trillions to big businesses, and gave you $1200, and then stuck you with the bill for all of it? And remember a year or so later, when the price of everything went through the roof. Yeah. That's how that scam works. As long as government is in control of the supply of money, they will use it to keep themselves and their billionaire sponsors wealthy at your expense. But if money was provided by competing providers, they'd have a vested interest in their currency retaining its value, or even gaining value, so that you'd use theirs instead of the competition's. Look at how Bitcoin has gained in value in the past 10 years, and compare it to how the dollar has lost value. That's the difference between government and the free market. Not only do we need to end the Fed, we need to get government out of the money business. End the theft, for good.

If the US cares about sovereignty why are they illegally in Syria? If they care about human rights why are they giving $4 billion a year to Israel? If they care about democracy why do they organize coups? If they care about freedom of speech and press why is Assange in jail?

Mexico President AMLO (2021): "It would be hypocritical to ignore that the main problem of the planet is corruption in all its dimensions: political, moral, economic, legal, fiscal and financial; it would be foolish to omit that corruption is the main cause of inequality, poverty, frustration, violence, migration and serious social conflicts. We are in decline because never before in the history of the world has so much wealth been accumulated in so few hands through influence and at the cost of other people's suffering, privatizing what belongs to everyone or what should not have an owner; adulterating laws to legalize the immoral; distorting social values to make the abominable look like acceptable business. In today's world, generosity and a sense of the common good are being displaced by selfishness and private ambition; the spirit of cooperation is losing ground to the profit motive, and we are sliding from civilization to barbarism, walking as if we were alienated, forgetting moral principles and turning our backs on the pains of humanity."

Russia Foreign Minister LAVROV: "This [sanctions] policy has failed... Three-quarters of the world's nations, especially Asia, Latin America, Africa, have not joined the sanctions. They are constantly being blackmailed, threatened, promised to cut off funding and create problems in getting loans from the IMF and the World Bank. They demand that they vote at the UN and other international organizations in support of resolutions condemning the Russian Federation. This is happening. We know what unscrupulous, literally gangster methods are often used to get these votes. We know this very well. They blackmail everyone with anything: bank accounts in the United States, and the fact that the children of the corresponding ambassadors and figures are studying in the West. This cannot be called diplomacy. This is pure blackmail below the belt. I don't even remember anything like this during the Cold War. But three-quarters of the world, a group of countries that we call the Global Majority... do not join the sanctions and has no intention of doing so. More and more countries are beginning to realize that playing the game of the West and blindly following its fairway may at some point be dangerous for themselves. No one knows who in the next year or the year after will be recognized by the Americans as a threat, a target, whose attack or isolation, punishment could play a positive role in the U.S. presidential elections or in the midterm elections for Congress. The Americans have everything tied up in their self-interest and selfishness."

The war isn’t on Jeremy Corbyn. He’s a proxy. The war is on you.

The riots in France are about Capitalism and about how the French won’t give up their rights to retire so the rich don’t have to pay tax. First it is 62 to 64, then 64 to 66, then 66 to 68 (like the U.K.). They won’t stop.

@Superninfreak @RichardHeartWin Should wasteful consumerism be incentivised because it’s ‘good for the economy’?