ham @ham_bitcoin

A Chicago philosopher wrote one book in 1940 proving that 95% of the books you have read in your life, you didn't actually read, and Charlie Munger has been telling people to read it for 50 years. His name was Mortimer Adler. He spent 40 years at the University of Chicago, ran the editorial board of the Encyclopædia Britannica, and built his entire career on one uncomfortable observation about the people around him. Most adults who called themselves well-read had not actually read a book in the real sense even once. They had run their eyes over the pages, registered the words, formed a vague impression, and put it back on the shelf. The book had passed through them without ever entering them. In 1940 he wrote How to Read a Book. It has stayed in print for 86 years. Charlie Munger recommends it. Naval Ravikant recommends it. Fareed Zakaria recommends it. Every serious thinker who builds a career on absorbing information eventually finds their way to this book, and the reason is that Adler had isolated something nobody else was naming clearly. There are four levels of reading. Almost everyone is stuck on the second one. The fourth level is so different from what most people call reading that you have probably never done it in your entire life. Level one is elementary. You learn it as a child. You decode the letters into words and the words into sentences. You finish the sentence and understand roughly what it said. This is reading the way a 7-year-old reads, and almost every adult on earth has stopped developing past this point in some quiet way. Level two is inspectional. This is skimming. You move through a book quickly to figure out what it is broadly about. You read the back cover, scan the table of contents, glance at a few paragraphs, and form an opinion. Most adults who claim to have read 50 books a year are actually doing this. They are inspecting books, not reading them. They walk away with a vague sense of the argument and almost none of the evidence that supports it. Level three is analytical. This is the level Adler said most people have never properly experienced. You take one book and you wrestle with it for as long as it takes. You identify the question the author is trying to answer. You map their argument from front to back. You write your disagreements in the margins. You force yourself to articulate, in your own words, what the author is claiming and why. The point is not to finish the book. The point is to argue with it as if the author were sitting across the table from you. Most people never do this once in their life, because it is exhausting and slow and feels nothing like the reading they were taught as children. Level four is the one almost nobody knows exists. Adler called it syntopical reading. The word means "across topics," and the technique is something closer to running a small private research lab in your own head. You pick a single question that actually matters to you. How does power corrupt people. Why do civilizations collapse. What makes a marriage last. How does a person change their own mind. Then you assemble five or ten or twenty books from different authors, different centuries, different traditions, all of them taking a swing at the same question. You do not read any of them cover to cover. You move between them. You find the chapter in book three that addresses the same question as the chapter in book seven. You force those two authors to argue with each other inside your own head. The book stops being the unit of reading. The question becomes the unit. And the authors become voices in a conversation you are now hosting. This is the level where reading stops being consumption and starts being construction. You are no longer absorbing what someone else thinks. You are building a position of your own out of the friction between people who disagreed. Adler argued that this is the only level of reading where you stop being a passive receiver of other people's ideas and start being someone who can produce ideas of their own. The reason Charlie Munger has been recommending this book for 50 years is that this is exactly how Munger has always thought. He calls it building a latticework of mental models. The technique he is describing is just syntopical reading applied for a lifetime. You take the strongest insight from psychology, the strongest insight from biology, the strongest insight from economics, and you stack them against the same problem until something new falls out the bottom. The reason most people never reach level four is not that it is intellectually difficult. It is that it is logistically uncomfortable. It requires you to keep multiple books open at once. It requires you to take notes that nobody is going to grade. It requires you to abandon the goal of finishing books and replace it with the goal of answering questions. This is also why AI just changed everything Adler was teaching. NotebookLM, Claude, and tools like them let you do syntopical reading at a speed that would have looked like magic to a Chicago philosopher in 1940. You upload 10 books on the same question. You ask the AI to surface every place those authors agree and every place they contradict each other. The technique Adler said almost nobody on earth had reached can now be run on a Sunday afternoon by anyone with a laptop and one good question. The technique was always the unlock. The bottleneck used to be time. The bottleneck is now curiosity. Most people will keep reading the way they always have. A book at a time. Eyes over the pages. No question driving it. No other authors in the room. Adler called that level two for a reason. You are not behind on your reading list. You are behind on the level you are reading at.

Only if all women could understand this‼️

An Argentinian TV show accidentally invited a urologist instead of a ufologist on and asked him about aliens. “I’m a urologist, not a ufologist. It sounds similar, but it’s not the same.” To be honest it sounds close enough to me. x.com/nexta_tv/statu…

Drone footage from above Mount Everest, the highest peak of the world. 📽: DJI

Worth reading. One of the best to ever do it.

imagine saying “no blockers from me” from here

Best friends 🤣

Armenian Near-Death Drama is rooted in the lack of faith and courage.

suprised HEX was not mentioned

Everyone needs to hear this…

“Sir, the Pentagon has failed another audit.” “Send in Big Balls.”

Leading Report @LeadingReport

a year ago

BREAKING: President Trump says he has directed Elon Musk to audit the Pentagon.

2K 7K 75K 10.6M 1K

There are no trans kids. No child is 'born in the wrong body'. There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined.

Sincerity is not the love language of X. That said…. You motherfuckers need to get your shit together in 2025. You need to stop being stupid and prioritize sleep. You need to move your lazy ass and exercise daily. You need to overcome your fast food addiction and eat healthy. Your mental health problems stem from the lack of basic self care. Show yourself some respect and stop doing stupid shit that makes you age faster and feel miserable. We have a very serious situation on our hands as a species. It is not clear that we will survive the coming years and decades. Many things threaten our existence and we’re fucking around with shit that doesn’t matter. We are primitive and shortsighted. We need to grow the fuck up and be equal to this moment. Start by getting your own mind and body in order. Lift weights and get jacked. Sleep well and stabilize your mood. Eat well and feel energized. We have work to do. Happy Holidays 🎄

10 Best Xavier Memes That will make You laugh 🤣😂 Check thread 🧵 1.

won’t mind to repeat

internet hall of fame @InternetH0F

2 years ago

This dude took bird watching to the next level

805 13K 152K 11.0M 15K

When bitcoiners start talking about an art, it seems to me as a sign of reversal.

This would be a good one

Rothmus 🏴 @Rothmus

2 years ago

💯💯

997 5K 24K 62.0M 1K

lol

Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪 @PeterMcCormack

2 years ago

£100k is the real 100k… Not your seditionist traitor dollars.

318 38 2K 90K 6

There’s no greatness in dominating. Greatness is in justice.

America already started feeling cooler again. Excited for changes ahead.