THREAD: This “Community Note” is false. It cites as its source a press release from the legal group that lost on the only question before SCOTUS. SCOTUS agreed with Texas's arguments & ordered the plaintiffs to seek redress through existing state law, which is what Texas urged.
THREAD: This “Community Note” is false. It cites as its source a press release from the legal group that lost on the only question before SCOTUS. SCOTUS agreed with Texas's arguments & ordered the plaintiffs to seek redress through existing state law, which is what Texas urged.
See the below excerpts from Texas's arguments and from the SCOTUS opinion. Indeed, SCOTUS instructed the plaintiffs to do "[a]s Texas explained." Functionally, the Court told IJ that it did not understand the basics of Texas law.
@TXAG You urged them to affirm the judgement of the court of appeals. They vacated the ruling of the court of appeals. You lost. Get over it.
@TXAG Your thread is gaining traction! #TopUnroll threadreaderapp.com/thread/1780681… 🙏🏼@Sweet_Liberty76 for 🥇unroll
@TXAG You asked the Supreme Court to kill the lawsuit of a Texas rancher who lost his cattle because of the state's action. Now the Supreme Court has revived that lawsuit against your wishes. The rancher will likely get paid. That is not what you wanted.
@TXAG @X @CommunityNotes @elonmusk False Community Note. Please FIX