@MickWest “Art’s parts and other bits of roadside junk”? The allegation, as claimed by numerous sources (and in the KONA BLUE documents), is that contractors are holding UAP materials, which were to be transferred. Please see below. Are “congressional staffers” driving all of this?
@MickWest “Art’s parts and other bits of roadside junk”? The allegation, as claimed by numerous sources (and in the KONA BLUE documents), is that contractors are holding UAP materials, which were to be transferred. Please see below. Are “congressional staffers” driving all of this?
@MvonRen The staffers are playing a part. If the staffers were appropriately skeptical, then it's unlikely things would have proceeded as they did. Of course, there are lots of other drivers. Chris Mellon, Robert Bigelow, Garry Nolan, Hal Puthoff, Peter Thiel, and even you.
@GoodTroubleShow @MvonRen Well, they might consider that the lack of hard evidence and the over-reliance on eyewitness testimony (often from many years ago) is an indication that the basis of the NHI hypothesis is on shaky ground. Also, Skinwalker Ranch.
@MickWest @GoodTroubleShow Let’s talk about that “hard evidence,” @MickWest. What’s your new theory for “FLIR1”? It clearly was not an F/A-18 (or, based on fuselage orientation, any other jet).
@MvonRen @GoodTroubleShow Its trajectory seems consistent with a distant aircraft of some sort. I understand you're going to propose a stationary object, or similar? What's your theory?
@MickWest @GoodTroubleShow It’s clearly not a distant aircraft. Based on fuselage orientation alone, that is an impossibility. See below. You realize that Kevin Day’s account (southern trajectory at ~28,000 ft and ~100 kts) is in the data, right?
@MickWest @GoodTroubleShow See below.
@MickWest @GoodTroubleShow Here’s a longer thread. Your theory of a distant aircraft is clearly not viable (based on distance constraints, NAR 2X settings, fuselage alignment). But just like “Gimbal,” the highly anomalous flight characteristics (described in detail) by witnesses can be found in the data.
@MickWest @GoodTroubleShow Here’s a longer thread. Your theory of a distant aircraft is clearly not viable (based on distance constraints, NAR 2X settings, fuselage alignment). But just like “Gimbal,” the highly anomalous flight characteristics (described in detail) by witnesses can be found in the data.
@MvonRen @MickWest @GoodTroubleShow Distant aircraft has been a distraction. Before lock is lost, everything points to a slow mover, from Chad testimony to the context to what we can retrieve in the data.