Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

building software to make our food supply chain safer. prev: trained young people at @theksociety and built products at @versettinc | DMs open. staticsteven.com Calgary, Alberta Joined January 2009

Tweets

15K
Followers

613
Following

626
Likes

10K

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

a month ago

@steveruizok gonna share for the other daylight owners??

0 0 1 55 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 months ago

@geoffreylitt can you share that recipe list though 👀

0 0 0 90 0

View Details

Emmett @emmettshine

3 months ago

x.com/i/article/2046…

9 24 342 196K 659

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

4 months ago

@aquavoice Do you guys have local models/offline support on Mac? Couldn't see anything on the site

0 0 0 123 0

View Details

Imagine if a documentary crew had been embedded with Oppenheimer, Fermi, and other scientists in the 1940s, watching history unfold in real time. Capturing the awe, the hope, the breakthroughs, and the world-changing decisions as they happened. We can’t travel back to the first Atomic Age. But we can be there for the second one. Right now, a new nuclear renaissance is quietly coming into existence. The technology, the visionaries, the political will, and the existential stakes are all colliding at once… and almost no one is telling the full story. Until now. I’m beyond thrilled to announce that I’m co-creating a multi-year epic documentary series called The Last Renaissance, together with award-winning director @TysonCulver. We’re gaining unprecedented, real-time access to the brilliant founders, new reactor designs, daring entrepreneurs, and the key players inside government who are rewriting humanity’s energy future. This is a civilization-level turning point that could reshape climate, geopolitics, prosperity, and even space exploration for the next century. This is the kind of story that only comes around once in a generation. I feel profoundly lucky to be in the room where it’s happening. And if you feel the call, if you’re as electrified by this moment as we are, we want you with us. Whether you’re an investor, a scientist, an engineer, a policymaker, or simply someone who believes this renaissance deserves to be witnessed by the world… Join us. The Atomic Age 2.0 is already underway. Let’s make sure the world doesn’t miss it.

77 108 757 186K 254

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

4 months ago

@SofiasBio @LRB gotta watch that casey video now too

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

5 months ago

@clerk Down right now? Can't access dashboard and attempting to auth on our platform that uses clerk is getting a 429.

0 0 1 215 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

7 months ago

what are the popular/useful QA agents out there right now?

0 0 0 27 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

7 months ago

There's been a resurgence in writing about taste and how important it will be in the age of AI (in terms of research taste, product taste, code, etc). I'm trying to make sense of it. The way I'm understanding things, people are using taste as shorthand for both pattern-matching & judgement vs personal aesthetics. It would be helpful to split the two up so you can better understand how to train and improve the right taste for you. One focused on aesthetics and is personal; it’s about what resonates with you. In this instance, there is arguably no bad taste (that’s applying a judgement of someone else’s choices with your own lens). The second is about distinguishing “good from bad” when attempting to meet a goal. This is arguably more objective and judgement based, since it’s something the industry generally coalesces around and there's usually some prior data. For the personal angle, it’s seeing what resonates. it's far more about aesthetics. Subrina Heyink had some great posts about this on Substack. Derek (@dieworkwear) does as well on PutThisOn. The short answer is trying lots of things and seeing what resonates. It's a lot of exploration and self-awareness into knowing what works for you and why. Maybe the only "bad" taste in this scenario is mindlessly following norms without considering why. But this is more like undeveloped taste. Your goal in this style of taste is just personal satisfaction. For the goal based one, it’s understanding what works and what doesn’t. The taste that comes in for something like research is an intuition for what will lead to potentially interesting outcomes. To get there you need to have a strong understanding of the landscape and what came before you. Bad taste here is clearer because it's essentially just bad decision-making. Your goal here is finding something that actually works. This could obviously overlap with personal satisfaction (it filters the available options). The best product people tend to have a strong sense of both personal aesthetics as well as pattern matching, allowing them to combine both what they find personally resonant with what works for products. The more I write about it the more I think they overlap. - you need a strong understanding of what came before you (taste has a lot of cultural context) - when multiple options can work there is a still a need for judgement In both scenarios exposure to lots of ideas/examples is key. So ultimately I think if you want to improve your taste you need to consider both. PS I'm just trying to figure this out so I could be overthinking this entire thing.

1 0 0 43 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

7 months ago

@ifvictr @aadilpickle Huge, thanks for sharing.

0 0 0 92 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

9 months ago

Another excellent essay from @zebriez and @joincolossus

Brie Wolfson @zebriez

9 months ago

I spent the last 60 days working at Cursor. It's been one of the most thrilling phases of my professional life. There's a lot of mystique around the company. Over the last two months, some things matched my expectations; many did not. I wrote an essay for @joincolossus

107 160 2K 1.9M 3K

0 0 0 161 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

11 months ago

@wolfejosh Interesting -- definitely would have thought it's the inverse. I wonder if the "where" has more short term impact but over 20y it nets out.

0 0 0 47 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

a year ago

Been loving claude code so much I almost upgraded to Max. Instead I spent too long staring at the terminal waiting for credits to reset and coding by hand. Felt weird, like I had one arm tied behind my back.

1 0 1 167 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

@amandanat Thought maybe this only included puns/portmanteaus at first.

1 0 1 65 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

Are there any good e-ink devices for reading long form PDFs? My go to has been getting them printed and bound and I like that, despite it making me feel like I’m in the Stone Age. But it’s a slow cycle of printing and picking it up. Looking for ideas. Maybe @remarkablepaper?

0 0 0 70 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

@chandhana should check out Metaphors We Live By. Not specific to this idea but would be interesting to see how metaphors compared to reality differ in each language

0 0 1 26 1

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

What’s the best site/newsletter for keeping up with interesting papers on @arxiv ?

0 0 0 77 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

@cloudenlight Excited to learn what you're working on + up to now!

0 0 1 16 0

View Details

Steven Ritchie 🧋 @staticsteven

2 years ago

Srs question: has anyone actually produced meaningfully better/more work thanks to any sort of AI-notetaking-synthesis tool? Feels like everybody sharpening their saw and nobody is cutting. Specific examples would be great.