Logo
Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

Cognitive Scientist and Assistant Professor @Illinois_Alma. Studies language and semantic development and computational models. languagelearninglab.org Champaign, IL Joined February 2011
  • Tweets
    1K
  • Followers
    317
  • Following
    827
  • Likes
    2K
jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 days ago

@AntigoneJournal No. There will be a synthesis route as well. And yes, we will at first be hated by both sides, like those who attempt synthesis usually are. But if the synthesis is as valuable as I think it will be, it will win out in the end.

Jon Willits retweeted
kasratweets Profile Picture

kasra @kasratweets

4 days ago

now that AI makes information consumption and transformation easier than ever I would like to bring back this old banger by Sasha Chapin about how books are not information transfer devices but subjectivity-merging devices in fact I would say content consumption in general is more about subjectivity-merging than information transfer, which is why I am generally much more interested in writing by humans than by AI

Jon Willits retweeted
PAHoyeck Profile Picture

Phil Hoyeck @PAHoyeck

3 days ago

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

a week ago

@ylecun @francoisfleuret It's about primary goal. Prediction/Understanding vs. Control. To control you usually need to understand, and to understand, you usually need to be able to control. But it's about, for the agent, which is the means and which is the ends.

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

a week ago

@francoisfleuret It's about primary goal. Prediction/Understanding vs. Control. To control you usually need to understand, and to understand, you usually need to be able to control. But it's about, for the agent, which is the means and which is the ends.

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 weeks ago

@dearmadisonblue @danwilliamsphil level of analysis issue. many similar and true things you can say about our cells (they are just doing X) but which do not detract from emergent capacities of a complex system built of those parts. I am not arguing LLMs have such capacities. But it’s an independent question.

Jon Willits retweeted
BrendanNyhan Profile Picture

Brendan Nyhan (@BrendanNyhan on 🟦☁️) @BrendanNyhan

2 weeks ago

GPT reviewer "scores above each paper's top-rated human reviewer" but AI review agents "overlap far more than humans do...and exhibit 16 recurring weaknesses humans do not share..." Results "position current AI reviewers as complements to, not substitutes for, human reviewers."

emollick Profile Picture

Ethan Mollick @emollick

2 weeks ago

Seems GPT-5.2 reaches expert level in peer review: 45 scientists took 469 hours evaluating human & AI reviews on 82 papers. "Surprisingly, current AI reviewers are competitive even with the top-rated reviewers in Nature’s official peer review..." though not without weaknesses.

Jon Willits retweeted
eigenrobot Profile Picture

eigenrobot @eigenrobot

3 weeks ago

asking people to read ai-generated text is offensive. this is not because ai text is intrinsically bad. rather, the author has not paid a cost to write the text himself. this cost is a credible signal he finds its communication important. so: not paying that cost is telling

Jon Willits retweeted
akoustov Profile Picture

Alexander Kustov @akoustov

3 weeks ago

Let me elaborate on why I think imposing minor but tangible penalties for hallucinations on a preprint server is appropriate (one-year bans in any single outlet are really not a huge deal). As you all know, I've been an "AI booster" writing on human slop before it was cool and getting flak for it. But journal editors really don't have a good option now. No matter what you do, you lose. Explicitly imposing some cost on careless submissions is a good idea. Should we have done it earlier for similar and more serious human errors in data analysis? Sure. But as many pointed out, the great thing about AI is that it gives us a good excuse to improve things in conservative academic institutions resistant to any change. My hope is that in equilibrium, when everyone is aware of the one-year ban rule, people will be less inclined to submit clear AI slop, or human slop for that matter. Or at the very least, they will go over their references and double-check everything. But if more outlets implement this rule and things go insane, I'm totally willing to change my mind.

akoustov Profile Picture

Alexander Kustov @akoustov

3 weeks ago

Good idea. Folks at other journals should be doing the same. Enforcement of professional norms matters.

Jon Willits retweeted
AnnaLeptikon Profile Picture

Anna Riedl @AnnaLeptikon

4 years ago

Here are 14 images to better understand cognitive science visually 🧵 (From a lecture I gave for @pgmid's BrainInspired discord community)

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

3 weeks ago

@Plinz @ihtesham2005 By replying, you’re boosting it.

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

4 weeks ago

@Plinz @simonmaechling Be Bayesian about it. In the counterfactual world where scientists were more conservative and careful, isn’t it possible that partisan attacks from the right over places they didn’t like the science presented neutrally (like climate) would have had the same collapse in trust?

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

4 weeks ago

@AdamZivo First have to resolve the debate about what university ed is for. If job prep is part of it, then excluding AI completely is a non starter. But if it’s traditional liberal arts “how to think and be a good citizen” then left leaning academia needs to figure out how to fund it

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

a month ago

@lakens Best practices have not permanently plateaued.

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

a month ago

@HowToAI_ Without someone taking responsibility for malicious code, this is a disaster waiting to happen

Jon Willits retweeted
helenldevine Profile Picture

Helen Devine @helenldevine

2 months ago

psych post-bacc jobs are scattered across wikis, twitter, and random lab sites. hard to find if you're not already in the field. I started a slack to pool them in one place — a low-effort bulletin board, channels by subfield, updated live! 🔗⬇️

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 months ago

@dioscuri @rgblong Does it always respond that way, even if you were to ask it how it feels about being told to be a “helpful assistant”?

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 months ago

@Morsker @NathanpmYoung I took as part of the thought experiment that you could tell them, but the challenge would be how to get them to believe you weren’t making it up

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 months ago

@PajosTM Um, compile time is minuscule compared to run time. Just be honest, they don’t want to learn C.

jonwillits Profile Picture

Jon Willits @jonwillits

2 months ago

@SashaGusevPosts @KordingLab Would’ve nice to make a nice long list. But isn’t NSF budget locked in though the midterm elections? And so this is a lot of talk unless Rs win?

Trends for United States

#vibragame
Bello
Cardi
Bolton
Watson
The Odyssey
Karmelo
He's French
Rogan
Down Syndrome
Proctor
#StuttgartWordAblaze
IMAX 70mm
Coleman Crow
Scary Movie
Hunter Biden
#ChávezPorSiempreChávez
#BLUE_MOON_SHINES_FOR_SEVEN
#7_ECHOES_IN_THE_MOONLIGHT
Persepolis

You might like

Assistant Professor @UCSanDiego Cognitive Science PI LIL Lab UCSD: https://t.co/gjSafWxIOj language development | cognitive development | learning (he/his)
Martin Zettersten
@m_zettersten
2K Followers
Clueless onto/phylogeneticist of language at Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu • él/he
Gon García-Castro �...
@gongcastro
2K Followers