Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

Senior Research Scientist at Stanford Bioengineering | Taking apart and building biology. Stanford, CA Joined March 2009

Tweets

12K
Followers

6K
Following

5K
Likes

36K

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@OdedRechavi Why not do both? 😂

0 0 2 233 0

View Details

biophotonicat @biophotonicat

2 years ago

Single-shot 20-fold expansion microscopy (relevance: 80%) nature.com/articles/s4159… #biophotonics #biomedicaloptics

0 2 6 1K 3

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ATinyGreenCell I find Threads to have more content I like. Not much science on any of these sites compared to the old Twitter though, so I use them all less.

1 0 2 104 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@pdhsu 💯

0 0 0 131 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ATinyGreenCell Addgene usually excludes the gene of interest from the feature list/map. So annoying for users, super bad training data for AI.

0 0 1 169 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@HarmitMalik Man, i feel that way with so many fewer requests than you. I can’t imagine how you do it.

0 0 1 266 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ATinyGreenCell most likely sequencing. I usually Sanger sequence and then find the homopolymers are okay.

1 0 4 364 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ATinyGreenCell I can also use my fluorometer! I can pick the bandwidth and wavelength. It is super easy to stick things in there!

0 0 2 111 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@bielleogy @ATinyGreenCell I do him most start off with some integrity and most bad actors learn to be bad. So there are many examples you hear about of people that go from bad to good. That may also be bc of negative bias in our stories and memories too.

0 0 0 51 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ProteiosTech I’d love to learn more about it!

1 0 0 18 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@jwsal sure

1 0 1 38 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

You have to be kidding me: nature.com/articles/d4158…

17 15 88 35K 18

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@com_ecology @tomkXY One crazy part is that senior PIs have so much less to gain by a Nature paper (or another Nature paper!), but they keep up the system and expectations. Jr researchers are dependent on them for promotions in most places, or to even get funding and keep their jobs.

0 0 1 22 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@abcairns @MJCliffe * for the first six months, then 29,9% APR 😝

0 0 0 11 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@haesleinhuepf Its a big part of the answer, but more specifically senior PIs need to not submit to Nature et al, and keep the manuscript as a preprint first. They are the ones that can usually afford these fees and they set the example.

0 0 1 103 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@tomkXY If only it was that simple. It takes many of the senior PIs to do that first and normalize it before others can do that and still get promoted.

1 0 1 92 0

View Details

Phillip Kyriakakis @breakliquid

2 years ago

@ambulanzen @LingfengGe “because our industry is, to a large extent, resilient to economic downturns as investment in research and learning continues.” Actually because its a monopoly, its resistant.