NFTheft @NFTheft

It’s not a bug, it’s a feature. Joined June 2013

Tweets

315
Followers

369
Following

731
Likes

3K

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

These clowns have lied to us too many times and it’s time to speak truth to power. All they care about is their celebs and investors. They don’t care about us.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

If @manifoldxyz does not admit to the community in the next 24 hours that they lied about the failed transactions, explaining in detail how / where things went wrong with their work, I will publish a complete report for everyone, since they’re obviously not gonna do it. #manifud

5 1 3 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@NFTethics

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@Qwerty_dot_art It’s old and outdated now. Didn’t want to keep it online since I don’t have time to maintain it. Wouldn’t be fair to everyone who would want to use it.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

Pandora’s Box is now open. Sleepmint any NFT you want. Hope you guys like it! #NFTheft #NFT nftheft.com/sleepmint/

3 4 24 0 4

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@culturehives @opensea @dfinzer @alex_opensea @artnome It marks the “owner” of the smart contract as the creator for the minted NFT, on any non-verified collections. This was to prevent the sleepminting. But it just made it easier to do ha ha. You just needed to make your own custom owner logic and expose any target as the owner.

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@culturehives @opensea @dfinzer @alex_opensea @artnome Yep this is a bug that was created by OpenSea themselves when they were trying to write a new code to prevent my original bug that I exposed and they tried to sweep under the rug 😂

3 0 3 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Yes those marketplaces do it on-chain already. Meaning it already works for them and does not need a central registry. It makes more sense for them to add support for different royalties rather than give you the right to decide for them. Power to creators and not central entities

3 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz And your excuse for solving the “complexity of royalties” is weak. Any marketplace can already abstract their call to accommodate all the different types of royalty configurations. You’re just trying to convince marketplaces to rely on you for this. A single point of failure.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Marketplaces can and already do query the actual smart contracts of the creators for royalty info. Why add an extra step and remove the power from the smart contract? It makes sense to create this as a fallback for legacy contracts that don’t have royalty info. But not as default

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@manifoldxyz This is equivalent to making the announcement: “Hello free and independent people, we are creating a centralized bank for you all. You’re too stupid to understand this big issue. So just be happy, comply, and don’t ask questions”

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Yes, and are you aware that to this day they have not implemented creator royalties into the order book directly? Even though they could and should have done it from day one of switching to wyvern?

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz The creators should be in control and dictate how the market works, not the marketplaces. This gives the royalty registry and the marketplaces control over these issues rather than the creators. You’re talking about making a Google/Amazon for creators here. Not a good idea.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Don’t get me wrong, in a utopian world this is the ideal structure. But we have to understand that change and improvements are dictated by the masses. Each smart contract should be in control of their royalties directly. We can’t have a single point of failure.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz This creates unnecessary complexities for artists. Providing no clear and easy way to directly attribute royalty payments for a particular sale. They just get a bulk sum every 3-4 weeks, and have to balance their own books to keep track of which royalties have been paid out.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Which is ironic since wyvern can do all that automatically on-chain and the data already exists in OpenSea for royalties that they can pass in to the protocol. They just refuse to add that one extra line of code in there for well over a year now. All in the name of “security”

1 0 1 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz Plus every year all major corps and entities make some commitment or another for some “greater good” cause. I’ll believe it when I see it. OpenSea paying out royalties on-chain.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

NFTheft @NFTheft

5 years ago

@wwhchung @manifoldxyz OpenSea to this day has not provided the source code for their NFT smart contracts, promotes insider trading, and keeps promising to combat fraudulent NFTs. How’s the communities calling out working?