Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

Law Firm Technology and Business Strategist. Stanford Graduate in Economics. Advocate for change in the business of law and legal education. Joined January 2013

Tweets

8K
Followers

1K
Following

2K
Likes

7K

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

2 years ago

@mreflow this new chip designed for AI seems like it should be talked about more. Could be an upstart competitor to Nvidia youtu.be/MZdH82aFPBc?si…

1 0 2 16 0

View Details

@exavierpope You opted for the pin code option. He can't complete the order without it. You said that you wouldn't text it to him & that you wouldn't come get the food. He left the order because thats what the app says to do if you can't complete the order after 8 minutes.

0 0 14 1K 1

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@rachsyme The reviewer doesn't seem to indicate they have actually seen more than the first episode. Nor does their review reveal anything of note that would bring someone to that conclusion. I would take the wait and see approach. It is HBO after all.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@bbqbaseball62 @johncampea Or they don't exist in his universe. He has never referenced them directly.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@johncampea The prequels don't exist in the prime universe of the MCU #Multiverse

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@johncampea

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@BaileyCarlin youtu.be/-15VC4Yxzys

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

LeGate @williamlegate

5 years ago

Why is the former president appointing foreign ambassadors & conducting unauthorized diplomacy on behalf of the United States’ Government?

506 689 4K 0 13

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@MarketWatch Now he can level up with his next film and make that dough 🤑

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@MarketWatch Newsflash: rich people already do this!

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@MarketWatch Investing in stocks generally doesn't create jobs, especially buying and holding. If you're investing in startups or IPOs that is arguably contributing to job creation. Buying stock in public companies is often helping someone else liquidate their position and inflating prices

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@ZachBurke15 @demosthenes_e @I_W_N_C @MarketWatch The dividend yield yes, but the total yield would likely be negative as most those stocks have price declines that far outweigh any gains from the dividends distributed. Drip investing would then compound the losses.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@EFrost21487563 @MarketWatch My thoughts exactly. Very bad startegy and could coat him so much more in the long run.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@FortuneMagazine Yes. It will be good for retail traders who have to work during the majority of normal market hours. Those are hours will become only for the professionals.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@BasedFx @TheEconomist We yes that is part of it. There are also skills gaps. Not enough people with the corresponding skills needed for the employment opportunities, hence a qualified labor shortage.

0 0 1 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@BasedFx @TheEconomist We do have labor shortages

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@BLaw Probably not the best time to be using Facebook as your shining example.

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@citizenkane61 @johncampea @Disney 🤔 So instead of just parting ways with this settlement they are gonna offer here a part in a movie that they could have just cancelled, then buy her out of that movie and end up giving her even more money for doing essentially nothing. Yep that such a smart plan 🤦‍♂️

0 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@citizenkane61 @johncampea @Disney It's probably in the settlement contract so they can't back out.

1 0 0 0 0

View Details

Brandon Reed @LegalDisruption

5 years ago

@StayPuffdPupil @johncampea What are you talking about? The number being leaked is the they settled on giving ScarJo another $40 million and future projects with Disney, the Tower of Terror being one of them. Further ScarJo is not an employee of Disney. She is an actor and her own business.