Pierre Convert @pierreconvert

@GlobeEyeNews My personal terrorists surveillance list has Anthropic at the topmost position.

@nytimes Liars. Whole story is made up. LLM block such requests immediately. And of course random dudes try every day to see what they are answered back.

@yacineMTB Just algorithmic: better results with spectacularly numbers of operations.

In the age of AI stripping individuals from their employment options, we must design systems that empower them again.

@DavidOndrej1 Coordinated. Multiple proofs

@AndrewCurran_ Very powerful operation indeed

@the_codewala Dysfunctional AI is a selling point for consumer product. AI is for work.

Here we go:

Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders

a day ago

Mr. Coxon is right. The very people building this technology admit that it could threaten the future of humanity. That is why I will soon be introducing legislation to ban superintelligence and pause AI development.

2K 5K 33K 2.2M 2K

“…18 minutes BEFORE…”. Great post on the Jakob resignation! A must read!

Parker Thayer @ParkerThayer

a day ago

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works: 1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal

2K 6K 31K 6.4M 12K

This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works: 1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance. 2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely. According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits. The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024. Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025. And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well. What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)? 3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself. It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one. 4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?

Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess

2 days ago

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

19K 158K 766K 160.8M 270K

@MorePerfectUS Concerning. Especially form those mobsters companies.

@BBCNews Is BBC a serious reading?

@rubenhume Of course yes. There is strong rational: hinge, perfect unfolded screen, etc.

@johnternus Splendid

My point is that if there exists a formula that is a general solution of Navier-Stokes, it would have to exhibit terms related to so many features (large eddy scales, boundary layers , vortices cascading, etc.) that -if each phenomenon is captured by a term- the result would looks like the standard model Hamiltonian, which is shit. Meaning, practical solutions are still CFD on meshes, and we didn’t bring any further advancement.

@BumrahBachi By the way…

Benjamin Collas @BCollasMath

2 days ago

15 129 2K 79K 240

@BumrahBachi We don’t even know what “solving Navier-Stokes” looks like… This (see photo - std model H)? How is that useful, or close to the initial intent (which was to find some Maxwell form, that can be handled to get solutions manually).

@vennictus Absolute clowns. Seems like no one is understanding how hard physics/rendering code are anymore.

@max_spero_ 100% sure this button has literally no effect. Or maybe it activated a stealthier data stealing somewhere in their cloud, something that is regulator proof but slightly more expensive to run. In the end, they will take ALL of the data they can touch.

@maria_rcks It is

@Cdpetty Then, no restaurants. Will eat at home or friends. Cannot stress more how disgusting it is to have to run a trading algorithm to place order! Ciao