Jack Matier | Ω @jackalyst

@shemnon @dark_matterfx Not sure if you could make note that PQ-Native projects don't get graded or instead of 'Tier' it could be 'Migration Tier'?

$QRL has reached 9,000 followers on CoinGecko! @QRLedger @coingecko #QuantumSafe #QRLfam

Quantum Resistant Ledger ( $QRL ) @QRLedger They promised a quantum-resistant blockchain since genesis. They delivered it. Referenced by Google Quantum AI quantumai.google/static/site-as… Cited in a Lockheed Martin patent patents.google.com/patent/US20240… Fully transparent & verifiable - though supply verification on @CoinMarketCap is still pending despite all details submitted.

@Ukafia2 @GabrielQuantic @CoinMarketCap Based off of the ethereum symbol in the bottom right hand corner of the qrl logo, it might be pulling from an ERC20 token that was migrated from in 2018, a handful of years ago. What app is this?

Bitcoin has at least 186.7 million UTXOs that need migrating to post-quantum cryptography before quantum computers break ECDSA-256. The absolute minimum time to do this from my research paper, packing every block optimally, zero normal transactions, is 76 days. That's not realistic. It's a theoretical floor. In reality, Bitcoin still needs to process normal transactions during migration. So the question becomes: given a quantum computing deadline, what percentage of every block must be reserved for upgrade transactions? If we take IonQ's roadmap (~1,600 logical qubits by end of 2028), that's roughly 1,032 days from today. The minimum block space required: ~7.4% of every single block, starting now. But that assumes migration starts today. It hasn't. There's no agreed signature scheme, no consensus on an upgrade path, and historically Bitcoin upgrades take years of debate (remember SegWit?). Every day of delay pushes that percentage higher. I've built an interactive calculator where you can adjust the deadline yourself and see what it means for Bitcoin's capacity. Links in the description Calculator: josephkearney.co.uk/bitcoin-quantu… Full paper: arxiv.org/abs/2410.16965

@JKim_Tran @IanSmith_HSA @Algorand @NervosNetwork @cellframenet @QRLedger @Minima_Global @TheQuantumCoin @btc_quantum @quranium_org @NaorisProtocol @QANplatform As it currently stands, QRL 1.x (PoW, RandomX) uses XMSS for the signature layer. QRL 2.0 (PoS), currently in testnet V1, uses ML-DSA-87. Perhaps as a future consideration, ECC exposure would be a decent metric. Doesn't do a chain any good if one person is using pq-signatures.

@NealinNFT @QANplatform @cellframenet @QRLedger Right, Uniswap would need to be built on a post-quantum secure blockchain that's EVM-Friendly, which is what $QRL is building towards with QRL 2. As it stands, though I still use it as my preferred swap service (especially USDT <> ETH), Uniswap isn't post-quantum secure.

@TheOmiHomie1 @BiconomyCom Is there a particular error you're getting with them? Looks like it's displaying my wallet deposit address fine and their public wallet is receiving deposits: explorer.theqrl.org/a/Q0103005dcee…

How are Bitcoin developers thinking about the quantum question? In our latest QRL Show episode, we’re joined by Hunter Beast (@cryptoquick), Bitcoin & Rust developer and author of BIP-360, for a thoughtful discussion on Bitcoin, post-quantum security, and more. Part 1 is live...this is a must-watch 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=F_SLui…

Tagging @RushCMC hopefully to help us out. We've been verified with CMC since 2023 after filling out the relevant paperwork, now suddenly unverified but not sure why? We've made massive progress going from ranking 800+ to top 200 the past year and hate to see momentum stopped!

QRL: The Quantum Resistant Ledger @QRLedger

5 months ago

We are continuing to engage with the @CoinMarketCap team to verify our Circulating Supply and Rank. As a standalone Layer 1 blockchain, QRL 1.0 is highly transparent: there are no liquidity pools, complex smart contracts, or hidden minting functions. The ledger is entirely

4 18 88 5K 6

This is a friendly last reminder that the VOLT-MINE QRL mining pool will cease operations on January 1, 2026. As previously announced, while mining will stop on that date, the VOLT-MINE dashboard will remain accessible until July 1, 2026.

@iBobbyShell @nic_carter @Crypto_Mags Like post-quantum secure TLS, SSH, Facetime/iMessages, iOS, AWS Payments, Kubernetes, Azure, etc. Either rolled out or being rolled out and with an easier migration path. Seems like everyone is taking it seriously to me and the S&P500 will be fine.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@coinbureau It is a lot easier to make a post-quantum chain EVM compatible than it is to make a legacy EVM chain post-quantum secure. For this reason $QRL (PQ for 7 years already) has been finessing PQ PoS and smart functionality before forking in Q1 2026.

@drrrroooppp @QRLedger Sorry to hear that! The Ledger integration can be particular requiring the Ledger device to only be connected to a QRL Desktop app. If you encounter any issues in the future, drop us an email at [email protected] or join our Discord at theqrl.org/discord.

The Zond upgrade represents a philosophical and technological inflection point for the Quantum Resistant Ledger ( $QRL ). It's not merely an iteration of protocol. It's an assertion of purpose. In a blockchain landscape driven by speed, hype, and short-term incentives, Zond stands as a manifestation of long-range thinking, a declaration that cryptographic integrity is not negotiable in a world approaching the quantum horizon. At its core, Zond transforms $QRL from a pioneering idea into a living, evolving organism capable of withstanding the next paradigm of computation. By integrating a high-performance EVM-compatible execution layer, Zond bridges quantum resistance with full smart contract functionality, uniting two worlds often seen as opposites: the cautious rigor of post-quantum security and the restless creativity of decentralized innovation.

$QRL The Weekly Show 📅 Friday, Oct 3, 2025 16:00 UTC · 19:00 EEST · 18:00 CEST · 12:00 ET · 09:00 PT 📺 Watch live 👉 kick.com/chillerid 💚 Smash that follow (it’s free!) to support & never miss a stream. 🎁 #QRL airdrops incoming — don’t miss out! 🔥

@_Checkmatey_ @caprioleio Some percentage of the market might be taking it into consideration if this chart is anything to go by. Of course there's any number of things that can cause a divergence, and it only goes back to around Feb of 2024 x.com/crypto_rand/st…

Rand Group @randgroup

9 months ago

Massive gap between #Bitcoin and the Global M2 waiting to be filled, just a matter of time Lock in because it will be savage ⚡️

53 27 115 47K 4

@caprioleio This might be one of the most depressing threads on the internet to scroll through right now if you're in the blockchain space.

@caprioleio Going into a bit more detail for #4, look up "Brace for impact: ECDLP challenges for quantum cryptanalysis". They seem to reach a similar conclusion with potentially different datasets, not sure if @pauli_group was consulted? x.com/pauli_group/st…

Pauli Group @pauli_group

10 months ago

The first attack on 256-bit ECC will plausibly happen between 2027-2033.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

1 13 38 14K 10