Insane. NYT reporters can't use the term Palestine
Insane. NYT reporters can't use the term Palestine https://t.co/YBbhcceGOB
@halalflow Can they say "Palestinians", though? If so, that would make sense. The other word is a political claim.
It's not Palestine. It's Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories. So it would make sense to not use the word Palestine. Even when speaking about the past it would be the British Mandate of Palestine still not just Palestine. The @nytimes has to be factual and can't have rogue reporters calling a place something it isn't.
@halalflow @LibyaLiberty NYT is zionist propaganda. Disgusting.
@halalflow @cherylbenson The NYT is jewish owned
@halalflow Well, that makes sense, of course. Arab peninsula colonizers aren’t capable of properly pronouncing the word Palestine. Can’t make them feel bad by constantly reminding them that this name existed a millennia and a half before The Prophet was born.
@halalflow @TaamoTOT Majority Jewish-owned NYT. Does it make sense? Why bother reading that rag
The New York Lies sinks to new lows everyday. Needs flotation devices fast. @nytimes
@halalflow To help counter this Hasbara-based NYT memo and all the rest of western media under the Hasbara program, instead of "Israel," I want to call it Palestine from now on. What do you think? #hasbara
@halalflow If you use the word Palestine or Palestinians, I guess that means they actually exist. The White House has yet to use the word Palestinians to my knowledge.