Felix Becker @fffbecker

I released @lixCCS v0.6.0-preview.2 on NPM. ``` npm i @lix-js/[email protected] ``` You can try out: - writing & reading files via SQL - branching - merging - entity level state (as precursor to entity level file diffs) The final v0.6 release requires the finalization of the physical storage to avoid breaking changes.

@heyandras Happy sponsor and Long time User - Container Logs via api is the only Feature I am missing - is there a way to pay for prioritization ?

its so cute that claude gives you time estimates for the feature you are developing. But no - i dont think this will take 3 weeks :) lets do it in 3min

Back in May '23 it was clear to me that stealing training data between models will become a big issue for OpenAi. That a chinese team (#DeepSeek ) will also question #Nvidia's interconnect moat by training sucessfully on H800s was not on my bingo card.

Interesting discussion of UK growth from Tyler Goodspeed, with an emphasis on the underprovision of business credit: youtube.com/watch?v=nmBe8N….

Patrick Collison @patrickc

2 years ago

In most countries, you observe a lot abandoned unfinished buildings. In the US, you virtually never do. I'd never thought about this as a physical manifestation of the US's highly developed credit sector. economist.com/middle-east-an….

38 111 1K 334K 472

I had a look at the party program of the AfD, that's the party that Musk supported. They're old-fashioned climate change deniers of the most idiotic kind. They still claim (in 2025!!) that the "The question for the human contribution [to climate change] is not settled." We left the "science not settled" phase 25 years ago! Fact is, that we know the contribution of various sources to climate change well, and that of humans is dominant, though of course the exact values have error bars. They go on to claim that "the alleged consensus for "human-made climate change" has previously been politically fabricated" And claim support from a declaration that has been signed by 2000 supposed experts. This statement has been debunked hundreds of times, is full of falsehoods, most of the people who have signed it have nothing to do with climate science, many have ties to the fossil fuel industry and in any case, just because some people have signed a nonsense statement doesn't make it true. (Oh yeah, and one of the signatories is John Clauser who claims he has fixed climate change with his self-made cloud model but can't tell a stratocumulus from a cirrus cloud.) This isn't a matter of debate, you can check for yourself that the predictions from climate models from the 1970s were in fact remarkably accurate. Even the fossil fuel industry, which developed their own climate models (probably hoping to get a different result), confirmed the climate model predictions. This has been so widely documented that to go around in 2025 and write -- in a party program no less! -- that climate models don't work or carbon dioxide isn't the issue, demonstrates that these people are either deliberately lying or don't have the faintest clue what they are talking about and also don't care. (Probably the latter.) It is one thing to have opinions about what, if anything, we should do about climate change. Mitigate or adapt? How much, how fast, how urgent? How much risk are you willing to accept, how much of a burden are you willing to put on future generations? These are all value positions that are up to discussion and can go into a party program. Scientific evidence is not a matter of opinion. This is a party which bases its so-called strategy on fabricated facts. It is hugely distressing to me that not only do brainless people like this sit in the German parliament but that a whopping 20% of Germans support this drivel. And that ladies and gentlemen is what your hero Elon Musk stands behind. (There's more rubbish in their program but for me this was the worst part.)

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@jxmnop Read the Google Chinchilla Paper - it literally answers this question. TLDR: more than 500B parameters makes no sense because we have not enough training tokens

@shl Feedback: I am in awe of the gumroad design and cool domain names ! but it takes a bit too long to understand what one can do on gumroad

@brexton The v0 of @langdock_hq had this

@leeerob Mindtrip.ai

@mwseibel i just built this this week - @mwseibel hmu if you want to give it a spin:

@levie The trick is to let a vision model/ agent do these CRUD interactions with an undocumented web app only once and then reverse engineer the API to reuse for future interactions. eg. book a flight on kayak -> 1st is slow via the vision model and 2nd time is very fast via api

never give up

@aleks_shamis Now that’s a portco benefit :)

edge of tomorrow is a movie about reinforcement learning

Happy Monday ☀️☀️ Today was the last Monday of the outgoing @EU_Commission On Monday Dec 2nd, if confirmed, the new team steps in. We’ve been working on getting more data on existing EU laws, to do a good post mortem on past company law digitalization initiatives & still waiting some data Our goal is to have a constructive conversation with @steph_sejourne @mmcgrathtd @EZaharievaMFA based on data so we accelerate, learn from the past to go full acceleration. Yes to performance, results 🚀 No to just nice sounding laws or concepts on paper with 🐢 speed impact and no enforcement. Yes we should put the lawmaking machine to serve Europe’s acceleration Yes we should also enforce existing red tape cutting laws immediately to make them truly useful Stay tuned and make noise 🔊🔊 🇪🇺 💙

Matt Yglesias on the fundamental problem with nuclear regulation.

Best thing I did was actively surround myself with builders I used to waste my time with people that talk but don't build Talkers cling on to builders to suck their resources like leeches They will put you in giant email threads, Zoom calls, endless DMs, to talk ideas and connect you with other people in the "ecosystem" You quickly realize you're now the protagonist in some bullshit startup theater show where nothing is ever going to be built Talkers have no skills to build, are too lazy to develop them, and thus hover around builders to catch some of their food remains like hyenas After 10 years in startups the talkers I know are still where they were when they started out While a large % of the builders are succesful, rich and have built things with impact to their little (or large) part of society Surround yourself with builders, not talkers because talk is cheap and building is hard!

My secret dream for Europe: - Call it United States of Europe 🇪🇺 - Offer EU citizenships - Let EU citizens only pay EU taxes - Allow EU citizens to roam freely across Europe for unlimited time - Never allow political parties on EU level, instead hire brilliant managers to run it

“We are killing our companies.” 💯