CZΛR @calezc

autonomous robot driving through the field at night. no chemicals. no pesticides. just UV light killing pathogens and pests while everyone sleeps. this is @tricrobotics. this is what chemical-free pest control looks like at scale.

1K 11K 64K 6.6M 10K

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@TrumpDailyPosts 🤡 🎥

0 0 0 8 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

Please just perform a numerical analysis based on the scope (media) and positions (owners and ceo's). You should identify the metrics (e.g., annual revenue, market cap, etc.) that captures or highly ranks all of these companies. Then, you should identify all companies that this metric captures (whether listed in the linked post or not). From there, you should determine whether the owners and ceo's of those companies are Jewish. Finally, you should determine the proportion of those individuals that are Jewish and identify the probability of that occurring, as a deviation from the portion of the US (and/or world) population that is Jewish.

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@grok @DanBilzerian The previously linked post with the list of companies says that it relates exclusively to media companies and identifies only owners and CEO's. Please limit the scope of your analysis to media companies and their owners and ceo's.

1 0 0 51 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@grok @DanBilzerian Here is a link to the original poster's list of the companies. x.com/i/status/20580…

Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian

2 months ago

Who controls the media? Meta owns: Facebook Instagram WhatsApp Messenger Threads Oculus / Meta Quest VR Meta AI Meta is controlled by Mark Zuckerberg who is jewish Alphabet owns: Google YouTube Android Gmail Chrome Pixel phones Nest smart home devices Fitbit (acquired in

6K 32K 117K 11.9M 43K

1 0 0 86 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@atensnut What is the basis for this ridiculous claim? I'm sure all the Dem war hawks will be elated that an antiwar candidate remains in the House?

0 0 1 19 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

What all the emotional responses here fail to comprehend is that as a citizen I am entitled to vote in whatever manner I choose. If you don't like my view, your only recourse is to try to change it. Ironically, I have likely been aligned with all of these people in effectively every election of our lives, and as such, am more likely than most others to be persuaded on the fine points of our disagreement. But despite that fact, 100% of commenters have resorted to attacks and divisiveness, rather than calm, reasoned discussion. Emotional outbursts may feel good in the short term, but they don't further your cause in the long run. In politics, you need to convince people, and attacks don't convince. I'll continue to speak my truth and keep an open mind should anyone choose to engage civilly on the issue.

0 0 0 2 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

If that makes me not a leftist so be it. Your label is useless. Why are we arguing semantics? I came here to offer a data point and have a productive discussion, but it seems like anyone offended by my point just wants to argue. You realize if I'm not on your team I'm immediately adjacent and could very well be persuaded? But being an asshole to me is not the path to make that happen.

0 0 0 16 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

You've failed to provide any support for your claims and continue to alienate me rather than try to convince me. You're just reinforcing the point of this post. I'm going to abstain from further replies to your comments unless you engage substantively and respectfully. To address what substance you have provided: (1) I'm familiar with his stance on the Dominion voting issue but not on the claim regarding lies related to it. Feel free to share a link as previously requested. (2) Assuming he is anti-vaxx, which is a broad claim that doesn't really capture his position, doesn't make you an ingenuine person, which was the point of the original comment, (3) "flirting with Holocaust denial" is a vague statement and absolutely requires substantiation. Does this have something do to with @martyrmade?

1 0 0 13 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@arkiliat @JoeGoesGaming @briebriejoy This was also pretty racist? Lots of pretty ethically questionable rhetoric flying around on your side of this

1 0 0 22 0

View Details

CZΛR @calezc

2 months ago

@arkiliat @JoeGoesGaming @briebriejoy Ever consider that any politician that claims that they stand for something can immediately change course once in office? Integrity matters, which is the entire basis for the discussion.