What Chris is doing here is presenting a premise as if it's accepted -- but he wasn't even at the event, and multiple attendees have explained that the event itself wasn't about any policy. You don't have to accept a premise just because a NatPo columnist acts like it's fact.
What Chris is doing here is presenting a premise as if it's accepted -- but he wasn't even at the event, and multiple attendees have explained that the event itself wasn't about any policy. You don't have to accept a premise just because a NatPo columnist acts like it's fact.
If you want to be pissed at someone, be pissed at the Justice Minister for doing a boneheaded tweet that made it sound like the event was about policy. It wasn't. Stop blaming the Governor General for a man's shitty tweet.
I will never forgive y'all if you allow online hate to be seen as a partisan issue. It's insane. Oh, and the dudes treating columnists on the internet as equal sources on this matter to attendees who were actually there? So they can seem fair to "both sides?" You're complicit.