Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll

@AAGDhillon Math does not lie. However, a formula can encode a lie. It was a week ago when I found the determinative multi linear regression formulas for the mayor’s race, then the governor’s race, then the ER sales tax.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@amuse Math does not lie. However, a formula can encode a lie. It was a week ago when I found the determinative multi linear regression formulas for the mayor’s race, then the governor’s race, then the ER sales tax…

@amuse It was the formulas.

@jleous @DC_Draino @jleous Looks like you are paid to troll.

I appreciate how you handled this. You confirmed what I sensed about you from the start. I just need you to understand that this work came entirely from my own analytical instincts and analysis, my own way of seeing things. I am planning to write a comprehensive article when the analysis is complete. So for now I’d ask that if you reference my work, just make clear it’s mine, not as a footnote or h/t, but genuinely and clearly, from the beginning. No hard feelings. Thank you for being straight with me.

THE FORMULAS FOR THE CA GOVERNOR’S RACE - WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER After the analysis I shared last week on the LA mayor's race, I received requests to do the same for the governor's race. Even though Steyer has since conceded, it was still worth doing. The similarities to the LA mayor's race speak for themselves. I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the statewide cumulative ballot data: Becerra% = 21.19 + (0.86 × x) Hilton% = 32.92 - (1.03 × x) Steyer% = 14.30 + (1.05 × x) Other% = 31.60 - (0.89 × x) where x = total votes counted, in millions. The Starting Points The constants - 21.19, 32.92, 14.30, 31.60 - are each candidate's extrapolated baseline at zero votes counted. The formula treats the entire race as starting from this fixed point and moving deterministically from there. The Slopes - How the Formula Runs The slope is the change applied to each candidate's share for every additional million votes counted. It isn't a one-time shift. It is a continuous, automatically scaling with the running total. Every percentage point Becerra and Steyer gain comes precisely from Hilton and Other combined. Closed system. Conservation of votes. The formula doesn't create votes, it redistributes them. The R² Values The Results Were Remarkable Becerra: R² = 0.99 Hilton: R² = 0.99 Steyer: R² = 0.99 Other: R² = 0.99 For context: 0.70 is considered strong in social science research. 0.85 gets researchers excited. 0.90+ is extraordinarily rare in human behavioral data. These numbers mean over 99% of each candidate's vote-share movement across five days and 2.5 million votes is explained by a single variable, total votes counted. Nothing else. You get R² like that in physics experiments. In controlled laboratory conditions. Not in a statewide election. Not across dozens of counties and millions of diverse voters, over five days, through normal reporting irregularities. The Slope Relationship Becerra's slope (+0.86) and Hilton's slope (−1.03) aren't identical, but their ratio is fixed and held for the entire five-day window. Candidates in a statewide election don't move in mathematical opposition to each other at a fixed ratio across millions of ballots, county by county, day by day. Four variables in an equation do. The Shutoff The stopping condition appears to have been triggered on 6/9. The closure rate, which had been accelerating for five straight days, climbing from around 15,000 to nearly 95,000 votes a day, collapsed to under 4,000 the day Steyer conceded. Becerra, Hilton, and Steyer then all went flat at once. Weird, huh? 🙄

The biggest scandal isn't just what happened during COVID. It's that six years later, the hidden censorship continues to emerge while many in government and the media still refuse to confront it. I've spent years following the money and exposing the truth. The American people deserve answers and accountability.

@World_Avenger17 I don’t think you had any ill intent, but, when I read your article I was quite surprised. The first 70% of it is entirely my work, my analysis, my thoughts and my resulting formulas. What is it that you’re trying to accomplish by copying my work as your article?

It was a week ago when I looked at the CA mayor’s race and thought, the lines are too straight. It’s all too smooth. I bet there’s a formula in there. There was. So I shared my findings. Then people asked me to do the governor’s race. Steyer had conceded by then, but, I thought it would be fun, so I did. More formulas. Different formulas with the same mathematical structure. Then someone asked me to do the ER tax race. Same findings. It looks like the conspiracy is that there is no conspiracy.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@Ginasassyass The math tells the story.

@USAttyEssayli @AAGDhillon LA mayor’s race

Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll

a week ago

THE FORMULAS WHAT THEY MEAN AND WHY THEY MATTER I derived four deterministic linear formulas from the ballot drop data: Raman% = 27.87 + (3.19 × drop number) Pratt% = 22.05 - (1.17 × drop number) Bass% = 40.20 - (1.86 × drop number) Other% = 9.88 - (0.16 × drop number) The

85 328 982 49K 403

@USAttyEssayli @AAGDhillon The math tells the story.

Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll

2 days ago

California governor’s race On June 3 Hilton was 27.6% and Steyer was 19.7%, a 7.9 point gap. By June 8 Steyer was 22.4% and Hilton was 25.0%, a 2.6 point gap. The formula needed roughly 3 more days of counting to get Steyer past Hilton. The pattern stopped the same day Steyer

24 46 150 51K 37

Math confuses Ted Lieu.

Truth Is Freedom @TruthAnswersAll

2 days ago

When Ted Lieu feels compelled to quote tweet my analysis, but ignores the substance and deflects with a senseless analogy… I guess the only conclusion is I must be over the target.🤷‍♀️

0 0 2 1K 0

California governor’s race On June 3 Hilton was 27.6% and Steyer was 19.7%, a 7.9 point gap. By June 8 Steyer was 22.4% and Hilton was 25.0%, a 2.6 point gap. The formula needed roughly 3 more days of counting to get Steyer past Hilton. The pattern stopped the same day Steyer conceded. The numbers flatlined. The bottom panel shows the gap closing in a perfect straight line and exactly where it would have crossed zero if the pattern had continued.

When Ted Lieu feels compelled to quote tweet my analysis, but ignores the substance and deflects with a senseless analogy… I guess the only conclusion is I must be over the target.🤷‍♀️

Ted Lieu @tedlieu

2 days ago

I hate it when the Browns are ahead at halftime but then flatline and lose in the fourth quarter. The game should keep going until the Browns are ahead.

49 81 576 36K 9

@JudicialWatch They’re trying to do a reconciliation with the ballots and the formulas.

@Ranting_Monkey Thank you! I kept trying to make sense of his analogy, but, it simply wasn’t possible. I assumed his brain must have short circuited - being over the target.

@BehindBluelinz @tedlieu So that’s why I couldn’t make sense of his senseless analogy.

@tedlieu I wonder what it was about my math that caused Ted to respond with a senseless analogy?🤔

@tedlieu