Shellie Streeter @ShellieStreeter

@Nipi_220 Coin purse

@mara_065 In a heartbeat

@DonaldTrumpJrQ2 A

@cryptsnchips @AvaBennettqk 😂

BREAKING: YES! A federal appeals court deals Trump a crushing Friday defeat by ruling that his hack MAGA minion John Sarcone was “not lawfully serving” as New York's top federal prosecutor when he targeted Letitia James’ office. This will send him into the weekend steaming mad... “We hold that Sarcone was not serving as Acting U.S. Attorney when he obtained the subpoenas because the [Federal Vacancies Reform Act] permits only a First Assistant already in place when the vacancy arises to become the acting officer automatically,” Judge Guido Calabresi wrote in a 39-page opinion, using an abbreviation for the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The court's ruling upholds a January decision from a lower court which disqualified Sarcone as the acting U.S. attorney for the Northern District of New York and quashed the subpoena he issued to James's office as part of a blatant White House-backed campaign of political retribution. Trump has been trying to exploit an automatic succession rule loophole to appoint his henchman as top federal prosecutors by making them "first assistants" which is technically the number two position inside a U.S. attorneys office. He hoped that with the top job vacant, the No. 2 appointee would become the de facto U.S. attorney. In Sarcone's case, his 120-day term as interim U.S. attorney expired last July, at which point then-Attorney General Pam Bondi mutated his title to "special attorney," hoping to keep him in place. “To install someone in a vacant office through a general delegation authority that [federal statute] expressly forbids, is to install an acting officer by another name,” Calabresi wrote. “The FVRA forbids it.” The Justice Department has already signaled that they intend to pursue this case to the Supreme Court, where they hope that the corrupt MAGA justices will side with their abuse of power. But this case is such an open-and-shut issue that even the most crooked judges on the bench may have to side against Trump. Please ❤️ and share to thank the court!

BREAKING: Trump commits his most pro-corruption crime yet by PERMANENTLY deleting the database that lists the "beneficial owners" of U.S. legal entities — meaning criminals can now easily hide behind shell companies. "It's like Trump ordering the deletion of the FBI's fingerprint database," stated former Congressman Tom Malinowski. We may as well have elected Al Capone to be President... "I helped pass this law in 2020. It's purpose is to prevent drug traffickers, Russian & Chinese kleptocrats, and other international criminals from setting up anonymously owned companies to hide their money in the US. Trump's Treasury Dept. is doing this to help criminals," Malinowski wrote on X in response to the announcement from the Treasury Department. In their post, Treasury touted the decision by their Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to "permanently" remove the requirement that entities report "beneficial ownership information." Worse still, FinCEN also stated that they "will delete previously reported information by U.S. persons from the beneficial ownership information database." The White House didn't even bother to construct a plausible explanation for the world-shaking decision, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent instead offering up some platitudes about "common sense" and cutting "red tape." But the motivation is painfully transparent. This administration is stuffed to the gills with white collar criminals. They're lining their pockets with sweetheart deals, running crypto scams, and constructing elaborate financial architectures for hiding and laundering money. This new decision makes it far more difficult for upstanding law enforcement agents to detect and prosecute these wrongdoings. "'Beneficial ownership information'" is just a record of who actually owns a company. That's all that was being reported here, so that we didn't have LLCs in Delaware laundering millions of dollars through the US and into offshore banks on behalf of totally anonymous people," wrote Malinowski. "Treasury deleting the beneficial ownership info it already gathered is utterly crazy. This database was not public -- it was just for law enforcement to use in investigating crimes. It's like Trump ordering the deletion of the FBI's fingerprint database," he continued. "Why is the Trump administration doing this? I don't know. But it's certainly good news for rich Russians who want to buy his condos, or Gulf royals buying his fake crypto. The true identities of people he's done business with, if registered with Treasury, will now be deleted," he went on. This particular point is crucial. Trump has been taking bribes out in the open (look no further than his Qatari jet) so one can only imagine what he and his family are raking in from foreign governments behind closed doors. By deleting this database, he makes it much easier for America's adversaries to funnel money to him and his cronies. This isn't just criminal, it's downright treasonous. "Last but not least, this is totally illegal!" added Malinowski. "Congress passed a law -- with strong Republican support BTW -- saying Treasury had to collect and keep beneficial ownership info. The Trump administration cannot say 'we're just not going to do it.'" "This will find its way to court. It will be struck down. But the deletion of data currently available to law enforcement may be irreversible," he concluded. "It's one of the most lawless and corrupt things this administration has done, and that's saying a lot." The illegality would be relevant under any other President, but with Republican control of Congress we can safely presume no action will be taken until after the midterms when Democrats obtain subpoena power. And since we likely can't undo the database deletion, we need to investigate and prosecute everyone who was involved in it. Please ❤️ and share to demand prosecutions!

@OccupyDemocrats Yes

@MelGibso1 E

THOMAS MASSIE: “It’s ironic that we control the House, Senate, Supreme Court, & the White House -- and we're yelling 'election fraud'? We won all the damn elections. What are we doing with that? We’re bankrupting the country. We’re starting new wars. We’re violating the Constitution. We’re not cracking down on the fraud. The problem is not the elections. We won the damn elections. The problem is that we’re wasting the opportunity voters gave us."

BREAKING: HAIRY SITUATION — Hegseth’s beard war is a perfect symbol of Trump’s BROKEN Pentagon priorities. As US-Iran tensions threatened to boil back over into open war, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth boarded a Navy ship with a mission. Not to assess military readiness. Not to check on troop morale amid international conflict. He was there to look for BEARDS — and not the kind that closeted gay Republicans marry to hide their sexual orientation. No, it was that typical masculine expression of post-pubescent virility, facial hair... And he found some. CNN reports Hegseth left the ship so rattled by facial hair violations that Pentagon officials scrambled into emergency meetings, with political appointees demanding faster enforcement of grooming policies. "The push is to move faster," one Pentagon official wrote in an email, describing pressure to "revamp timelines" on Hegseth's beard crackdown. Let that sink in. America has troops deployed from Iran to the Caribbean. The nation is grappling with the aftermath of a war that's cost every household at least $1,000. And the Secretary of Defense is treating stubble like a national security threat requiring urgent Pentagon-wide task forces. "No more beardos," Hegseth declared to a room of top military officers last year, killing years of gradually loosening facial hair policy. But this isn't just culture-war theater — it has real, discriminatory consequences. The policy disproportionately targets Black service members who suffer from pseudofolliculitis barbae, a painful medical condition where shaving causes hair to curl back into the skin. Under Hegseth's new rules, commanders can now discharge troops who need a shaving waiver after just one year of treatment — even though the military successfully managed this condition for over a decade. Richard Brookshire of the Black Veterans Project didn't mince words: the policy "allows for an environment of hostility to our Black troops" and risks "getting rid of well-qualified, patriotic, lethal soldiers" — after taxpayers spent millions training them. This is the same Hegseth who's brought Christian prayer services into the Pentagon, threatened the Boy Scouts over diversity policies, fired senior black and female officers, and cut military partnerships with Harvard and Yale for "leftist ideology." America is at war. Pete Hegseth is hunting beards and pushing out Black service members over a treatable skin condition. Priorities, indeed. Perhaps this hairy kerfuffle will lead Hegseth to hire and promote more female service members, for whom facial hair will be a moot point. Please like and share if you see no reason why a Christo-fascist like Hegseth shouldn’t allow male service members to emulate the visage of a bearded Jesus Christ!

@0TulsiGabbard2 No to the f*** hell no

BREAKING: In a humiliating moment, the leader of Qatar’s negotiating team just completely ignored JD Vance. These negotiations are going horribly and once again the Trump Administration is making the US the laughing stock of the world.

Trump told Leslie Stahl something years ago that everyone should hear. She asked Trump he kept calling the media fake news. He said, I do it because I need to discredit you, so that when you say negative things about me, nobody believes you. That is EXACTLY what he’s done. The problem everyone has with him is that most of us grew up with values, ethics, and integrity. That is not Donald Trump. He figured out a long time ago that he can bully his way through any rule and if he keeps pushing harder and harder, people will relent. For most of his life they did, but we must stand up against it.

@SarahWorkx Yes

FUCK FOX “NEWS!”

A brand new bridge between Detroit and Canada is finished and ready to open. It would speed up traffic for millions of trucks, cut delays for American businesses, and help the auto industry that employs people in every state. There is just one problem. Donald Trump won’t let it open. Here is why. The family that owns the old bridge stands to lose business when the new one opens. So in January, they gave one million dollars to a pro-Trump super PAC. Weeks later they met with Trump’s Commerce Secretary. He called Trump. Hours after that, Trump announced he would block the new bridge. The opening was set for June 12. It got canceled the day before. The bridge sits there finished and empty. Now here is the part that should make every taxpayer angry. Canada paid for the entire bridge. Every dollar. And the United States already owns half of it for free. Trump is holding up a bridge we got for nothing, to protect a donor who wrote him a check, while picking a fight with our closest ally and biggest trading partner. This is corruption in plain sight. A billionaire pays, and the President delivers. American workers and businesses pay the price. Open the bridge. A government should work for the people, not for whoever writes the biggest check. nytimes.com/2026/02/20/us/…

@0TulsiGabbard2 trump

@YourAnonNews