Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

Political consultant/operative, executive protection. National Ambassador, VP Virginia VFAF Virginia, USA Joined August 2016

Tweets

433
Followers

665
Following

615
Likes

242

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

4 weeks ago

If this is how they “fight” the man who built his brand on impeaching Trump, what does winning even look like to them? At what point do we stop calling this incompetence and start calling it intentional?

0 0 0 19 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

4 weeks ago

Trump’s chief enemy in Congress is fully funded, barely challenged, and sitting on Armed Services. You don’t lose a seat like this by accident – you lose it on purpose.

3 0 2 66 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

4 weeks ago

I laid out the ground game months ago: One unified candidate. Early money and national focus. Treat VA-7 like a 5-alarm fire. Instead, the party chose silence, a clown-car primary, and business as usual.

0 0 0 23 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

4 weeks ago

Eugene Vindman helped bring down Trump’s first term. Now he’s in a D+2 district with millions in the bank and a five-way GOP primary protecting him. The math says “winnable.” The structure says “we’re not even trying.”

0 0 1 57 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

a month ago

He built wellness programs for seniors across the New River Valley. He launched Rock Steady Boxing for people fighting Parkinson's. He remembered residents' names, their families, their stories — when everyone else was "too busy." He peddled them in his rickshaw so older adults could feel the wind on their faces again.

0 0 0 39 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

a month ago

The Supreme Court of Virginia just struck down the redistricting amendment in a 4-3 ruling. The April 21 election. Nullified. The Democrat-drawn 10-1 congressional map. Dead. The majority opinion ruled the General Assembly violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Virginia Constitution when they referred the amendment to the ballot. The Court's exact words: "This constitutional violation incurably taints the resulting referendum vote and nullifies its legal efficacy." $5.2 million in Virginia taxpayer money paid for the special election itself. Should every lawmaker who voted to spend $5.2 million of your money on this illegal election be held accountable — yes or no? Comment below. See less

0 0 2 124 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

Three warnings on the record: court voided the statute, DOJ warned on paper, she signed enforcement anyway. This matters far beyond Virginia. If a Governor can sign around a standing injunction in Richmond, it can happen in your state next

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

A Virginia court erased this law six months ago. The Governor just ordered state police to enforce it anyway. Every private‑sale background check under HB 1525 today is legally indefensible. One signature does not cancel a court order.

3 0 0 64 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

Wilson v. Hanley (Oct 16, 2025) – permanent injunction halting Va. Code 18.2‑308.2:5. Six months later HB 1525 orders state police to enforce the same regime the court struck down. Court said stop. Governor said do it anyway.

0 0 0 37 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

0 0 0 37 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

QUESTION: Should the Virginia Supreme Court uphold Hurley's ruling — YES or NO?

0 0 0 29 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

🚨 A Virginia judge just wiped out the April redistricting referendum after nearly 3.1 million ballots were cast. Judge Jack Hurley ruled the amendment was void from the start. No certification. No new map. No legal effect. This is now a national redistricting fight. Should the Virginia Supreme Court uphold it — YES or NO?

11 0 0 111 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

If courts uphold Hurley, the result could become a warning shot to any legislature trying to shortcut constitutional amendment procedures in the middle of a national map war.

0 0 0 21 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

This matters beyond Virginia because national reporting described the referendum as part of a broader mid-decade redistricting battle affecting control of the U.S. House.

0 0 0 23 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

Related proceedings in Scott v. McDougle were set on an expedited schedule, with briefs due April 23 and oral arguments set for April 27 according to VPM's explainer.

0 0 0 31 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

The Virginia Supreme Court allowed the referendum to proceed earlier without deciding the merits, leaving the underlying legality unresolved until after the vote.

0 0 0 30 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

Hurley had already ruled for Republicans earlier in January and February before the latest post-election ruling returned the case to the center of the state fight.

0 0 0 25 0

View Details

Shayne Snavely @ShayneForVA

2 months ago

The core legal issue is whether Virginia lawmakers satisfied the constitutional requirement to pass the amendment in two separate sessions with a House of Delegates election in between.