Phip @Phipppit

Here’s what this actually means… The “final reveal” didn’t show up on X because it was never meant for retail - it showed up in the 21 shares filing - more to come on that later today. Again, … It showed up in the filings. …the infrastructure shifts. In the routing language that only makes sense if the pipes are already connected. Redemptions will be settling in XRP. If you know, you know. Not settling in cash. 👀 GTreasury didn’t just appear It’s now the distribution channel — it positioned itself as a distribution rail for institutional cashflow where those institutions and/or clients legally couldn’t touch the crypto brokerages. Ripple Prime didn’t just launch — it stepped into the Ferrari role: fast, clean, settlement-grade routing for real volume. They’re going to be busy at Hidden Road in December - really, really busy. And the CME futures approval wasn’t “another listing.” It was the first confirmation that XRP now belongs in the same regulatory airspace as the assets used for collateral, hedging, and clearing. No DERIVITIVES for now. There’s a reason for that I’ll drop later today. Not contextually important to this message. Same process oil and gold went through. Get it?! Same process as BTC - but the plumbing and architecture is prepped better so it’ll move faster. Liquidity,…and perhaps price. Likely price - once it gets going. Because while BTC ended up becoming digital gold - it really doesn’t have utility. Once XRP lifts off and motion begins — the flywheel gains juice. It accelerates. It matures. RLUSD is another key. It’ll NEVER override XRP — that’s hype, newsmakers, antiXRP people. But RLUSD will become the predominant stablecoin over time. In this stage, it’ll act as a prop to help XRP lifts off with speed, and that WILL CAUSE Price Discovery. Structure ✔️ Plumbing ✔️ Cash-leg (RLUSD) ✔️ Venues ✔️ Participants ✔️ The market is watching price. Institutions are watching function. When the plumbing is finished, the flow always comes next — and the plumbing is now finished ☑️ DONE THE CASH LEG RAIL ✅ Remaining To-Do’s ☑️ OCC ☑️ Confirmation of multi-AP alignment - these are the REAL POWER BROKERS — 21 shares was the first crumb. Once 2-3 more majors greenlight same move — the game is OVER. ☑️ Activate what I refer to as The Holy Trinity: Ripple Prime, G-Treasury, Qualified Custodians (BitGo, Standard Custody, Anchorage) ☑️ XRP to settle and not just trade — although this may moreso be Phase 2 after XRP matures a bit We do NOT need the Clarity Act. We don’t want the Clarity Act. Not until later. The Clarity will be helpful for the launch of Phase 2 Price Discovery for XRP, not now. Once that unfinished business above earlier converges, price isn’t just going up. It’ll be repriced naturally due to structure to reflect what it’s actually designed to service. More to come today. If you like what we’re doing here drop a line, even a hello, and crush that little ❤️ button.

SonOfaRichard @heythereRich

9 months ago

the final Reveal was SHARED yesterday — if you know where to look no hype not on X structure ☑️ Plumbing ☑️ fire 🔥 up the ferrari (and I don’t mean the car)

9 4 136 34K 18

53 59 492 28K 102

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@DigiToolBuilder Why was it over $1B AUM last week and below that now with more xrp AUM at relatively stable xrp price?

0 0 1 55 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@leadlagreport

0 0 1 285 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@beyond_broke

1 0 2 503 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@beyond_broke @MrVamos194 🤣😂🤣

1 0 0 31 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@beyond_broke @SArcaria Stay gold, Ponyboy. Stay gold.

0 0 1 33 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@beyond_broke @Balatros1 Perhaps financiers and wealthy industrialists would’ve been better than bankers to describe the federal reserve opposition that went down with the ship.

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@RipBullWinkle @GiancarloO777 @ChadSteingraber Where can we watch this live?

1 0 1 149 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@beyond_broke @Balatros1 You mean the analogy where all the bankers went down?

3 0 2 1K 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

9 months ago

@elonmuskADO 56

0 0 0 12 0

View Details

Phip @Phipppit

10 months ago

@shanaka86 Couldn’t they simply make in-kind BTC contributions to an ETF to get under 50%? Then they would own shares that own BTC for a portion of their holdings. This would increase their holding cost for the portion transferred but it would get them under the limit.