Shashank and others correctly pointing out that this was effectively a surrender document by any other name, yet somehow the authors have still contorted themselves into knots to try and place the blame on Ukraine & her allies, and still claim, without a shred of irony, that this was a “serious” proposal from Russia.
Shashank and others correctly pointing out that this was effectively a surrender document by any other name, yet somehow the authors have still contorted themselves into knots to try and place the blame on Ukraine & her allies, and still claim, without a shred of irony, that this was a “serious” proposal from Russia.
And here’s how Britain’s most senior Putin apologists are interpreting it, if you needed any more evidence that these idiots don’t read anything beyond the headline and don’t actually scrutinise any of the details contained in the reporting.
And yet again, they make no attempt to address why this “Istanbul I” would be respected by Putin any more than the Minsk I and Minsk II. Force the army that just humiliated Russia in Kyiv to disarm before invading again in a few years time. Do not take the opinion of anyone who refuses to answer this question seriously, because they are not putting forward a serious question.
@OzKaterji he broke 2 treaties but the other side thinks talking with this dictator and getting him to sign another useless piece of paper he will immediately disregard is the solution