Jack @JackRuby1964

Joined July 2009

Tweets

12K
Followers

791
Following

4K
Likes

8K

Jack @JackRuby1964

4 days ago

@EmmanuelAcho @OldTakesExposed If you had the opinion and tweeted before the game, one thing. Stating what is happening as insight and then having the game turn is another

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

5 days ago

@kendallbaker Nash Jordan Leonard Lebron Dan Issel only won 68, tough game

0 0 0 10 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

a week ago

@JeffreyBenson12 Cash out gets taxed.

1 0 1 2K 0

View Details

@mattkalish @jonlerner Offshore still takes sharp action. Books can bet out, but line movement can achieve similar. Some retail Vegas took action, it's been awhile. Books can manage their sharp players. Head fakes happen, but at least they know who is playing vs never ending beards.

0 0 1 56 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

a week ago

@mattkalish @jonlerner Old school books know how to handle sharp action. Lots of assertions (only taxes make it legal... we don't live to serve the state) and half truths. Exchanges limiting next level absurd and revealing. No problem with reasonable limits, euro style cut to nothing is misguided.

2 0 0 186 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

a week ago

@RGIII @Gretegiii @OuttaPocketRG3 or enforce the existing rules. Your ethics assertion is short on substance. Is it just because you say so?

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

2 weeks ago

@realJPFriend1 @C00P3RFLAGG @TMZ Not if they streamed it.

1 0 0 46 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

2 weeks ago

@chloeisrxch @TheCinesthetic Mostly agree. Reservoir dogs was great. True Romance (he wrote) good all the others just ok

0 0 0 23 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

2 weeks ago

@Jackkk From that point forward he did not grow the money enough to keep the Mavericks

0 0 0 31 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

2 weeks ago

@WatcherGuru @mcuban Sold Broadcast.com for 5.7 billion in 1999. If he was good with investments he would have been able to keep the Mavericks

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Mike Levin @MikeLevin

3 weeks ago

This New York Times piece is worth your time. Here’s what is happening, as simply as I can put it. Back in January, Trump sued the IRS, an agency he controls, demanding $10 billion over the leak of his tax returns a number of years ago. IRS lawyers did their jobs. They wrote a memo laying out the defenses that could beat the suit, including the fact that Trump filed too late. His own lawyer was in court when the leaker pleaded guilty in October 2023, more than two years before Trump sued. The Justice Department never showed up to court. Never argued back. Never used the defenses sitting on their desk. The judge got suspicious and ordered both sides to explain whether they were actually opposing each other or just colluding. The day before that brief was due, Trump dropped the suit. Same day, his Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion taxpayer-funded “anti-weaponization fund.” Trump gets a formal apology. The IRS agrees to drop any audits of him and his family, even though a 2024 Times report found a loss in an ongoing audit could cost him over $100 million. The acting Attorney General, Trump’s former criminal defense attorney, picks the five commissioners who decide who gets paid. Trump can fire any of them. Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are not ruled out. This is the most corrupt thing I’ve ever seen from an American president. Where in the hell are my Republican colleagues? nytimes.com/2026/05/19/adm…

1K 12K 29K 2.0M 5K

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@Cointelegraph Going to be featured in a horror movie where the equipment malfunctions

0 0 0 9 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@BDunk975 Going to claim hit by pitch = contact and lean over the plate

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@AlexTran677026 You left out where the women were complimenting his speech and he says "well, i didn't get the toast did i?"

0 0 0 35 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@thomasjordaniv Once you show a pulse you get limited or booted

0 0 0 17 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@archeohistories Who laid the taxes on the funds to cover the taxes

0 0 0 808 0

View Details

Jack @JackRuby1964

3 weeks ago

@RotoPat Caruso not guarding Wilt

0 0 0 63 0

View Details

Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee

3 weeks ago

James Madison described the powers of the federal government as “few and defined” and those reserved to the states as “numerous and indefinite.” We’ve been dangerously drifting from that understanding since the 1930s. The drift has been most evident in areas now most fraught with waste, fraud, and abuse. If we honored the Constitution’s limits on federal power, there’d be very little waste, fraud, and abuse in our national government. Share if you’d like to see a “constitutional reset,” in which any government function that’s not obviously and necessarily federal under the Constitution would be returned “to the states respectively, or to the people,” as the Tenth Amendment specifies.