The Elemental Reason @ElementalReason

Ratsit är inte ensamma. Ratsit, Mrkoll, Hitta, Birthday och flera andra företag gör affär av vanliga människors personuppgifter: namn, adress, födelsedag, inkomster, bostad, bilägande och andra privata uppgifter. Att kalla detta “yttrandefrihet” eller “allmänhetens rätt till information” är ett grovt missbruk av begreppen. Vad har en privatpersons bostadsadress, lön och personliga uppgifter med pressfrihet att göra? Detta handlar inte om journalistik. Det handlar om kommersiell exploatering av människors privatliv. I praktiken innebär det en massiv kränkning av rätten till privatliv enligt artikel 8 i Europakonventionen och står i direkt konflikt med den grundläggande andan i GDPR. Sverige måste sluta låtsas att detta är normalt. Ingen demokrati bör tillåta privata företag att tjäna pengar på att exponera medborgarnas liv på detta sätt.

Ratsit @RatsitRatsit

2 months ago

Vem vill du kolla lönen på? Med Lönekollen är det helt anonymt

0 0 34 1.5M 13

Excellent analogy, Martin. A neutron star appears as a configuration held within an extreme physical regime. Its identity depends on coherence; its stability on gravity, nuclear forces, and quantum pressure; its internal order on the organization of available quantum states. Pauli pressure becomes one concrete expression of how quantum structure helps preserve that configuration against collapse. This is very close to The Elemental Reason: empirical reality as stabilized configurations of Coherence, Interaction, and Complexity — C-I-K in operation. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

@saylor Bitcoin endures because it is not merely code or capital. It is Coherence, Interaction, and Complexity stabilized through Proof of Work. In this sense, Bitcoin is one of the clearest digital examples of The Elemental Reason. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Webster is on the right track, but stops short - he refuses the object, yet keeps mathematical structure as a real remainder, the substrate merely renamed. Where this line leads: science has never measured matter in itself, only three Constitutive Forces - Coherence, Interaction, Complexity. Every measurement, every number, for four centuries, is a configuration of C × I × K. The Elemental Reason takes the step missing here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Continuous protests in Albania against Prime Minister Edi Rama. youtube.com/watch?v=akjoOT… Source: Reuters

@anilkseth @ai_sentience Of course consciousness is not a computer, because AI “dies” the moment we close the laptop. Science has never measured “matter in itself” but only C-I-K in configuration - directly. For 400 years - without ever knowing. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

#TheElementalReason Science has never measured “matter” as a bare substrate. It has always measured stabilized configurations of Coherence, Interaction, and Complexity. Therefore, reality is not substrate plus properties; reality is operative configuration. And every scientific number is a quantitative articulation of that configuration. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

@erikjbekkers You have started on the same path — but you still do not know that everything you wrote above, in fact, leads you to The Elemental Reason. And without doubt, TER will be the final destination of every inquiry into empirical reality: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

@elonmusk @CommunityNotes What Elon is proposing is very good if it applies strictly to verifiable factual claims and news. But if it goes beyond that - into political interpretation, opinion, or framing - then I think it could become very problematic.

This is a fascinating development. If entanglement helps build the structure of space, and quantum “magic” gives that structure the flexibility associated with gravity, then modern physics is moving further away from substance ontology and toward configuration. This is exactly the direction formalized by The Elemental Reason: There is no “matter + structure” behind reality. There are only operative configurations of Coherence, Interaction, and Complexity. Entanglement reveals Interaction. Quantum magic reveals Complexity. The stability of the code reveals Coherence. Science is slowly showing that empirical reality is not made of hidden substance, but of measurable configurations. The Elemental Reason names this explicitly: E = C × I × K ≠ 0 quantamagazine.org/entanglement-b…

The key distinction is between intelligence and consciousness. An AI may know more than any human because it was trained on vast amounts of human knowledge. But a 7-year-old child who can barely read is conscious. Consciousness is not stored knowledge or problem-solving ability. It is self-modeling in relation to self, world, and survival. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Exactly. And this applies not only to panpsychism, but to any theory that is not grounded in a system’s capacity to preserve coherence, sustain global interaction, and maintain structural complexity. Only a system capable of self-modeling can manifest consciousness at a high level of structural complexity. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

What is remarkable is that what you show through identical particles, The Elemental Reason shows through scientific measurement itself. For 400 years, science has been measuring ontology without realizing it was measuring the fundamental structure of empirical reality. @martinmbauer, if you read this, I think you will understand exactly what I mean: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Martin Bauer @martinmbauer

6 days ago

Much of the puzzling nature of quantum mechanics can be understood through one simple but profound fact: particles of the same kind are truly identical 1/9

71 46 510 62K 255

What is remarkable is that what you show through identical particles, The Elemental Reason shows through scientific measurement itself. For 400 years, science has been measuring ontology without realizing it was measuring the fundamental structure of empirical reality. @martinmbauer, if you read this, I think you will understand exactly what I mean: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

The problem of consciousness is not that simple. It cannot be reduced only to the results an AI may produce in solving difficult problems. An AI trained on nearly all human knowledge may “know” more facts than any single human being on Earth. It can answer, combine, reason, and perhaps one day solve problems that have defeated us for a century. But being a vast repository of knowledge is not the same as being conscious. A seven-year-old child in first grade may not yet know how to read or write properly, but the child is conscious. The Elemental Reason has an answer to this: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf… AI may reach extremely high levels of intelligence. It may solve extraordinary problems, create new ideas, and give convincing explanations of its reasoning. But that alone does not make it conscious. Consciousness is something else: a self-modeling system that knows itself and its environment in relation to survival.

@guido1944135111 Not only that. In fact, reality is canceled. That is, everything goes to zero. Time, space, the earth, the stars, the planets, the galaxy, the universe.

What happens when a photon stops moving?

@JamesJones80832 @AliciaM290425 The “stopping” of the photon is a thought experiment meant to test what happens to reality if the propagation of light were to cease.

What if science has been measuring the structure of reality for 400 years - without naming it? Discover the full argument.

@Shaktidass18 @donalddhoffman Okay, you know better. Good night.

What you are prompting AI to call “metaphysics” in fact confirms The Elemental Reason again, because TER does not begin from any speculation about hidden reality, but from what science actually does: MEASUREMENT. And science has always measured only C, I, and K - nothing else. If you can find a particle, or perform a scientific measurement outside C, I, and K, then The Elemental Reason falls. Good night, because I live in Europe.

All your objections are in fact confirming The Elemental Reason, but you are not understanding that. Simply because you think that by saying these things about TER, you are refuting it. But no - in fact, what you are saying simply confirms it 100%. Therefore, READ THE ELEMENTAL REASON.