Michael Charney @DutchReach

Covid vaccine linked to broad protections against heart conditions, study finds wapo.st/4uFTXlB

@cilantro_daddy @davidfrum Sinwar was no Nelson Mandela.

@carljfree @davidfrum Fact: No genocide of #Gazans, but a #genocide on Israelis #Oct7. 1/3rd #Gaza dead =#Hamas #terrorists. War deaths due to H's strategy of #humanshields to foment outrage among #usefulidiots & #antisemites. War wd've ended fast had H released hostages, surrendered & disarmed.

@MarsitaTheUltra @davidfrum Nothing like disappearing the violent facts & couching proPal terrorists as sweet bunny disciples, not agitated groupies channeling Islamist brand antisemitism.

Civil disobedience: 1) Non-violently transgress a law you believe unjust 2) Accept the legal consequences 3) A public shocked by the harshness of the punishment forces changes in the law. Palestine Action: 1) Smash property and hurt people 2) Demand to be exempted from legal consequences 3) A public shocked by the violence of the crimes committed thinks, "actually these sentences seem rather light under the circumstances."

BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking

2 weeks ago

UK government's ban on Palestine Action is lawful, Court of Appeal says, overturning earlier ruling bbc.in/4uMempi

301 241 2K 408K 74

It is illegal under Palestinian law for a Jew to own real property. It’s punishable by death for the Palestinian who attempts to sell the real property to a Jew.

Ted Rall, America's BS Detector @TedRall

2 weeks ago

There is zero evidence that a Palestinian state would not allow Jews to live there.

542 15 185 280K 24

If ‘activists’ cared about the human rights of Gazans trapped in the conflict, they would at minimum decry Hamas’s brutal public executions, maiming, and torture of Gaza residents on the open streets, for the whole world to see. But those episodes were met with silence and continue to be. It’s not a just cause. It’s warmongering for the eliminationist cause of designated terrorists vying for the destruction of Jewish sovereignty. The truth, put tersely, is ugly as sin.

Prof. Math & CS @Zeev81309559

2 weeks ago

Being pro-genocide of Jews is not an excuse for fracturing an innocent person's spine with a sledgehammer.

6 13 181 4K 1

This is heavy but important. An Israeli combat medic named Daniel Elbo Arama shares what he saw treating a young woman right after the October 7 attacks. She was barely clothed, covered in blood, and begged him for help. In the ambulance she told him she had been raped by four terrorists. The bleeding was so bad they had to use medications normally given for gunshot wounds. She needed hours of surgery afterward. Daniel has worked in emergency response for twenty years, including in conflict zones, but he says this day will stay with him forever. Raw testimony like this shows exactly what happened that day. We can’t forget.

What I learned watching Islamic preachers from all the mosques in the west for 3 years? In short, They just indoctrinating Muslims to be a good jihadist, all the spiritual aspect is to be willing to die for the sake of Allah. To hate this world and not be attached to it, in order to be willing to die in Jihad. They always camper the Sahaba generation that succeeded to conquer many countries because they were sincere to die and sacrifice everything for Islam. The Islamic Ummah goal is world domination, and the goal for every individual Muslim is Paradise, to please Allah in order to get to paradise, what please Allah the most is to die for him in Jihad, everything els is below, you can spend $Billions to advance Islam but you will never get the reward of a terrorist that blow himself up and become a martyr.

On the morning of November 30, 2021, in a courtroom in Frankfurt, a judge read out a verdict that no court anywhere had ever delivered before. The defendant, an Iraqi former ISIS member, was guilty of genocide. The specific crime: the death of a five-year-old Yazidi girl named Reda. He and his wife had purchased Reda and her mother as slaves in 2015. As punishment for wetting the bed, he had chained the child to a window in the open sun in Fallujah, Iraq, in heat that reached fifty-one degrees Celsius, and left her there until she died. The mother survived. She testified. It was the first time any court anywhere in the world had convicted any member of the Islamic State of genocide. It was the first time any court anywhere had ruled in law that what was done to the Yazidi people was a genocide. The institutional path that made it possible to use that word, in that courtroom, six years after Reda died, runs straight back through the United Nations to a twenty-two-year-old Yazidi woman who, in December 2015, decided not to speak in generalities. Her name is Nadia Murad. She was born in Kocho, a Yazidi village of about seventeen hundred people in the Sinjar region of northern Iraq. On August 3, 2014, ISIS fighters surrounded Kocho. They separated the men from the women, took the men to the edge of the village, and shot them. They took the older women and shot them too. Among the dead were six of Nadia's brothers and her mother. The younger women — Nadia among them — were loaded onto buses and driven to Mosul. There, they were sold. She was twenty-one years old. She would spend the next three months in captivity, passed between captors under what ISIS called sabaya — sex slavery — until, in early November, she found a door left unlocked and ran. A Muslim family in Mosul, at enormous risk to themselves, sheltered her and helped get her out. She crossed into northern Iraq, then a refugee camp, then Germany, which granted her asylum. She was, by every standard the world recognizes, free. She was also, by every standard the world recognizes, free to be silent. Most survivors of mass sexual violence are silent. Nadia Murad chose differently. On December 16, 2015, she walked into the chamber of the United Nations Security Council, accompanied by the human rights lawyer Amal Clooney, and described what had been done to her and her community. She did not speak in generalities. She did not use the diplomatic euphemisms — gender-based violence, crimes, abuses. She used the names of things. She said the women had been sold. She said the children were as young as nine. She said her mother had been executed. She said what had been done to her. Then she made the demand the testimony had been built to make: international recognition that this was a genocide, and prosecution of the people who had committed it. The room was silent. The transcript exists in the UN archives. Here is the part that turns a speech into law. Vague testimony, by design, cannot become evidence. A genocide conviction in a court of law requires testimony specific enough that a judge can rule on intent, on system, on patterns of conduct. Nadia's testimony, and the testimony of other survivors she helped gather in the years that followed, was specific enough to do that work. In 2016, the United Nations Commission of Inquiry formally determined that ISIS's treatment of the Yazidis met the legal definition of genocide. The United States, the European Parliament, and the UK Parliament reached the same determination in the same months. In 2017, by Security Council resolution, the UN established a specialized investigative team — UNITAD — whose job was collecting evidence to courtroom standard, so prosecutions could one day take place. In 2018, she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, shared with the Congolese gynecologist Denis Mukwege, for their work to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war. She used the acceptance speech to remind the room of the women still missing. And in 2021, in Frankfurt, in a case in which Amal Clooney represented Reda's mother, the architecture caught up with the testimony. There have been further German convictions since. There are open prosecutions in other countries. UNITAD's investigative files have been used in courts where the crimes themselves happened in Iraq but the accused was found in Europe, under universal-jurisdiction laws that allow genocide to be tried wherever the perpetrator turns up. Nadia Murad is thirty-two years old now. She continues to travel, to testify, to run Nadia's Initiative, which rebuilds water systems, clinics, and schools in Sinjar — the region she came from. By the most recent figures, more than two thousand eight hundred Yazidi women and children are still missing or held in captivity. Mass graves are still being excavated. The first time a court used the word genocide for what was done to her people, the year was 2021. The first time anyone said it in a chamber where the law could hear it was December 16, 2015. The woman who said it was twenty-two. She did not speak in generalities. If her story moved you, drop one word in the comments — Nadia, witness, evidence, anything that comes to mind. Tap the like button so more people find this story. The page is small. Every reaction helps us keep telling stories like this one.

Ms. Rachel: "Palestinians have such a rich beatiful culture"

这些难民女性在德国🇩🇪申请庇护时的理由无一例外都是声称遭受了伊斯兰和哈马斯的迫害，德国政府同情并很快给了她们难民身份，但当她们拿到难民身份后立即翻了脸，她们几乎每天都游行示威，不工作，不融入德国社会，她们公开支持伊斯兰教，支持哈马斯，她们甚至还要求德国🇩🇪实行伊斯兰教法！ 你们还敢同情这些穆斯林女性吗？

x.com/YossiBenYakar/… If the purpose of the veil is to protect women from men with no impulse control, then why veil a baby girl? ​A child, still learning to speak, is already being taught to hide her face from the world. This isn't modesty. This isn't culture. This is indoctrination. This is control. ​When you force a little girl to carry the burden of "temptation," you aren't protecting her. You're teaching her that she is the problem. Is this religious freedom, or is it child abuse disguised as faith?

Criticizing Israel for bombing Beirut after Hezbollah drone strikes on northern Israel failed to kill civilians is like criticizing the police for shooting the sniper who fired on innocent bystanders and missed.

Another revealing report by @unwatch A 104-page investigation has just been released, showing that the United Nations’ top human rights experts have abandoned the role of independent monitors and are now political activists or corrupt individuals paid by dictatorships to undermine democracies. The report profiles 13 of the UN Human Rights Council’s Special Rapporteurs. Here are just a couple of examples: - Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women, has refused to acknowledge the October 7th massacre, denied Hamas sexual crimes against Israeli women and amplified Hamas-aligned propaganda. - Alena Douhan, the UN special rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures, received $1.3 million in funding from China, Russia, and Qatar.   - Ben Saul, the UN special rapporteur on counterterrorism, received $150,000 from China. Though he routinely castigates Western states, he has refused to issue any statements on China’s persecution of the Muslim Uyghurs, which Beijing justifies as “counterterrorism.”   - Tlaleng Mofokeng, the UN special rapporteur on the right to health, said “Hamas are not terrorists,” and endorsed “the legitimacy of armed struggle.”   - Michael Fakhri, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, accuses Canada of committing genocide. Though Venezuela routinely bars UN monitors, Fakhri was specifically invited for a visit, which he used to lavish praise on the Maduro regime.   - George Katrougalos, a former Greek foreign minister serving as the UN independent expert “on a democratic and equitable international order,” received $100,000 from China in 2025. In the same year, he promoted Xi Jinping’s book and praised the Chinese dictator’s “vision of openness, development and dialogue” and “shared future for humanity.” He also traveled to Tehran that year, where he met with the regime’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi to jointly lament “Israeli and American crimes.”   - Irene Khan, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of expression, turned a blind eye to gross and systematic violations of free speech by the regimes in Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Myanmar, as well as internet shutdowns by Iran and Turkey, yet she devoted an entire UN General Assembly report to condemning Western states for allegedly repressing pro-Palestinian protests. @unwatch founder @HillelNeuer comments:   “Alena Douhan, the UN special rapporteur on unilateral coercive measures, who defines Western sanctions on dictatorships as illegal, received $1.3 million from China, Russia, and Qatar. No one is even checking how this money is being used. If a judge took $1.3 million from one of the parties, they would be immediately disqualified and removed from the bench. If a journalist openly endorsed a terror group on social media, they would be fired on the spot. Yet the UN’s rapporteurs operate without ethical constraints or consequences — and there’s not even a procedure to remove them. The result is a powerful bloc of compromised officials who enjoy not only diplomatic immunity, but complete impunity”

Islam in Iran: Muslim husband smiles with his child bride’s severed head in public. Mona Heidari was sold by her Muslim father at age 12 into a forced marriage with a monster. Her Muslim husband beat her if she failed to satisfy him sexually, feed him, or remain silent. He subjected her to inhumane abuse and torture, enabled by Islamic authority. He tortured, raped, and inflicted sadistic violence on her, calling it marriage. She fell into depression shortly after the arranged marriage. At age 17, severely depressed and broken, unable to please him, she sought divorce and escape from Iran. He called his Muslim brother to punish her for disobedience. They tied her hands and feet and tortured her to inflict maximum pain, ignoring her cries for mercy. No one called the police. In Iran under Islamic law, husbands are required to beat wives for discipline. During the prolonged torment, the brothers mutilated her living body. Once she was too weak to resist, the enraged husband beheaded her. He then paraded her severed head through Ahvaz streets to restore family honor, showing pride. Like many child brides in Iran and the Muslim world, Mona endured inhumane treatment from her husband and family, who knew of her suffering but blamed her for failing to obey. Thousands of women in the Middle East and Asia are murdered yearly in “honor” killings—executions for dishonoring families or challenging male dominance. Muslims may view these Islamic practices as justice fitting the will of Allah. In the civilized world, they are crimes against humanity, women, and human dignity. Western leaders must not sacrifice women’s rights for political survival. Migrants seeking Western settlement must reject Islam’s Sharia laws or face asylum rejection. This is not a “cultural difference.” This is barbarism enabled by Islamic doctrine. The West has no obligation to import or tolerate systems that treat women and girls as property to be bought, raped, tortured, and murdered.

Bergen Belsen right after liberation, 1945. The audacity of people to compare this to the shawarma eating, Dubai chocolate munching, Mercedes Benz driving men of Gaza is nothing but cruel inhumanity.

תהיות @historyinpic9

2 weeks ago

שחרור ברגן בלזן, 1945.

127 130 1K 855K 50

Felix M. Warburg a German Jewish banker and philanthropist, helped shape New York’s cultural and scientific life. As a trustee of the American Museum of Natural History, he supported one of the world’s leading research institutions.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next