Donald Newmeyer @DonNewmeyer

This ODNI declassification involves the initial discussions surrounding the release of my First Yan Report on Sep 14, 2020 (x.com/DrLiMengYAN1/s…) What is shown here is only the tip of the iceberg. These emails expose part of the intense cognitive warfare conducted by the CCP and forces aligned with Fauci to suppress global investigations into the truth of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the transnational persecution and suppression of whistleblowers. These revelations deserve careful examination. Key Points 1. On the very day I released the 1st Yan Report on the origin of COVID-19, DHS requested that the Intelligence Community analyze and discuss it. * However, someone within the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), without genuinely reviewing the contents, immediately characterized the report as “nonsense,” claiming that its conclusions were inconsistent with the “natural origin” narrative that had been promoted under Fauci’s leadership. * This raises a critical question: Was INR misled, or were certain individuals intentionally participating in efforts to suppress investigations into the origin of COVID-19? * More importantly, the email contains the following statement: “A couple virologists at State and I reviewed a version of her paper — it's been circulating for at least a month or so.” This statement is demonstrably false. * The report was uploaded and published on Zenodo at approximately 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on September 14, 2020. One month earlier, the report had not even been completed, and it had not been provided to anyone for review. How, then, could this individual have seen it “a month earlier”? 2. The following day, September 15, another effort was made to smear and discredit both me personally and the scientific evidence presented in my COVID-19 origin report by circulating a false narrative published in The Daily Beast. That article was based entirely on false narratives promoted by the CCP. * It was fully consistent with the large-scale disinformation campaigns later advanced by the CCP through outlets such as The New York Times, Guancha.cn, and many others, as well as with the CCP’s broader campaign of transnational persecution directed against me. * BTW, my first Twitter account—which had posted nothing except a link to the Yan Report—was permanently suspended on that very same day. The suspension shocked observers around the world. 3. Truth is eventually seen and verified. In the evening of Sep 14, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory requested that a group discussion (“circle up”) be organized to review the report. * The reason was straightforward: They considered portions of the scientific evidence presented in the report to be credible and worthy of further detailed examination. * They also proposed bringing personnel from Los Alamos National Laboratory into the discussion. 4. As additional members of the Intelligence Community carefully reviewed the report, a Sep 18 email showed that, based on the important illustration in the Yan Report describing the technical feasibility of laboratory synthesis of SARS-CoV-2, together with the report’s extensive chain of evidence built from hundreds of scientific references, analysts had already confirmed that the laboratory-origin pathway I described was technically feasible. * The email further noted that these methods were sufficiently mature that even undergraduate students could readily learn and apply them, and that the evidence pointed directly toward the Wuhan Institute of Virology. * This is particularly significant because Fauci and the CCP were aggressively insisting at the time that a laboratory origin was “technically impossible.” 5. It is important to remember that by following the technical pathway laid out in the Yan Reports, investigators can conclusively establish that the CCP’s military-civil fusion biological weapons system—represented by the Wuhan Institute of Virology—possessed the relevant capabilities, researchers, scientific publications, and research foundation necessary to conduct such work. The same evidence also exposes the false “scientific research” narratives regarding viral origins that were jointly promoted by the CCP and Fauci-associated interests. Furthermore, the evidence points directly and unequivocally to the coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21, originally discovered by the PLA in bat populations near Zhoushan in 2017, as the true templates of SARS-CoV-2. 6. As I keep telling the world, COVID-19 virus is an Unrestricted Bioweapon. Xi Jinping-CCP developed and released it intentionally and caused the historical disaster! Hold it accountable and prevent it in the future!

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard

a day ago

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements

20K 101K 327K 31.8M 53K

The Covid origins cover up is the biggest scandal in history, as well as the greatest institutional deception ever perpetrated. Not even Russiagate comes close to the sheer breadth and depth of the deception, involving countless people across governments, intelligence agencies, academia, the media and public health institutions over the course of many years. The two scandals are, of course, intimately connected. The only reason the Covid lies were able to endure for so long was the same all consuming hatred of Trump that fueled Russiagate. That was the glue that held the entire conspiracy together. The fact that Tulsi had to wait until her final day in office to make this statement, together with the fact that no one has been held to account, and the establishment’s desperate effort from blocking Bill Pulte from succeeding her, only reinforces the conclusion that the people who orchestrated this cover up remain firmly in charge and that this battle is far from over.

DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard

a day ago

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements

20K 101K 327K 31.8M 53K

Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it. Gabbard's final act as DNI was to declassify the proof. And it confirms what a CIA whistleblower had already sworn to Congress weeks earlier. What the documents actually show. 🧵

This ODNI declassification involves the initial discussions surrounding the release of my First Yan Report on Sep 14, 2020 (x.com/DrLiMengYAN1/s…) What is shown here is only the tip of the iceberg. These emails expose part of the intense cognitive warfare conducted by the CCP and forces aligned with Fauci to suppress global investigations into the truth of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the transnational persecution and suppression of whistleblowers. These revelations deserve careful examination. Key Points 1. On the very day I released the 1st Yan Report on the origin of COVID-19, DHS requested that the Intelligence Community analyze and discuss it. * However, someone within the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), without genuinely reviewing the contents, immediately characterized the report as “nonsense,” claiming that its conclusions were inconsistent with the “natural origin” narrative that had been promoted under Fauci’s leadership. * This raises a critical question: Was INR misled, or were certain individuals intentionally participating in efforts to suppress investigations into the origin of COVID-19? * More importantly, the email contains the following statement: “A couple virologists at State and I reviewed a version of her paper — it's been circulating for at least a month or so.” This statement is demonstrably false. * The report was uploaded and published on Zenodo at approximately 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on September 14, 2020. One month earlier, the report had not even been completed, and it had not been provided to anyone for review. How, then, could this individual have seen it “a month earlier”? 2. The following day, September 15, another effort was made to smear and discredit both me personally and the scientific evidence presented in my COVID-19 origin report by circulating a false narrative published in The Daily Beast. That article was based entirely on false narratives promoted by the CCP. * It was fully consistent with the large-scale disinformation campaigns later advanced by the CCP through outlets such as The New York Times, Guancha.cn, and many others, as well as with the CCP’s broader campaign of transnational persecution directed against me. * BTW, my first Twitter account—which had posted nothing except a link to the Yan Report—was permanently suspended on that very same day. The suspension shocked observers around the world. 3. Truth is eventually seen and verified. On Sep 16, the third day after publication of the First Yan Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory requested that a group discussion (“circle up”) be organized to review the report. * The reason was straightforward: They considered portions of the scientific evidence presented in the report to be credible and worthy of further detailed examination. * They also proposed bringing personnel from Los Alamos National Laboratory into the discussion. 4. As additional members of the Intelligence Community carefully reviewed the report, a Sep 18 email showed that, based on the important illustration in the Yan Report describing the technical feasibility of laboratory synthesis of SARS-CoV-2, together with the report’s extensive chain of evidence built from hundreds of scientific references, analysts had already confirmed that the laboratory-origin pathway I described was technically feasible. * The email further noted that these methods were sufficiently mature that even undergraduate students could readily learn and apply them, and that the evidence pointed directly toward the Wuhan Institute of Virology. * This is particularly significant because Fauci and the CCP were aggressively insisting at the time that a laboratory origin was “technically impossible.” 5. It is important to remember that by following the technical pathway laid out in the Yan Reports, investigators can conclusively establish that the CCP’s military-civil fusion biological weapons system—represented by the Wuhan Institute of Virology—possessed the relevant capabilities, researchers, scientific publications, and research foundation necessary to conduct such work. The same evidence also exposes the false “scientific research” narratives regarding viral origins that were jointly promoted by the CCP and Fauci-associated interests. Furthermore, the evidence points directly and unequivocally to the coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21, originally discovered by the PLA in bat populations near Zhoushan in 2017, as the true templates of SARS-CoV-2. 6. As I keep telling the world, COVID-19 virus is an Unrestricted Bioweapon. Xi Jinping-CCP developed and released it intentionally and caused the historical disaster! Hold it accountable and prevent it in the future!

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1

5 years ago

Links of new version of Yan Reports Affiliation: Yan Research - An Independent Research Team 1st Yan Rep zenodo.org/record/5111537 2nd Yan Rep zenodo.org/record/5111559 3rd Yan Rep zenodo.org/record/5111594 #COVID19 virus is CCP’s #UnrestrictedBioweapon, intentionally released!

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

1K 1K 2K 0 113

@HighWireTalk @SecKennedy @delbigtree We were told that antigenic drift was not promoted by mRNA vaccines. Obvious now in retrospect.

“I am so old that I can remember when other people’s achievements were considered to be an inspiration, rather than a grievance.” — Thomas Sowell

@StellarSolar The problem is that the basic fees keep going up, regardless of whether you have excess generating capacity.

“Widespread”? We see what you did there. So you admit there is some voter fraud…but say it isn’t “widespread”. why are you so sure it isn’t “widespread”? You don’t support investigating it to know how deep it goes.

Congresswoman Sara Jacobs @RepSaraJacobs

a week ago

There is NO credible evidence of widespread voter fraud in California, just like there was NO credible evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 elections. Donald Trump will run this play again in November – the American people must reject it. theguardian.com/us-news/2026/j…

5K 364 885 262K 32

@japan_nobunaga “Somewhere in this building, mathematics lies defeated.” I laughed

@StephenGardnerX @bourscheid And he actually has worked towards solving several big human problems.

The sheer scale of a trillion dollars can be hard to comprehend. Let me put it in perspective. You would be able to buy 42 miles of high speed rail in California with that much money.

Sridhar Ramesh @RadishHarmers

a week ago

The sheer scale of a trillion dollars can be hard to comprehend. Let me put it in perspective. You would have to earn a dollar a year for a trillion years straight to have that much money.

209 532 16K 1.2M 316

@CarloVallebona @delbigtree @grok Where to find lamerato et al

A new Enigma album just dropped.

@Old_But_Gold50s There’s nothing good about this video. The audio is a disgraceful monotonous and unmusical piece that doesn’t remotely correspond to whatever Lang Lang was actually playing, and the audience is spliced in from some other context. This is a destructive anti-aesthetic abomination.

@Middleman015 @MrStrong_Utd Not true, in my experience.

@DisgracedProp @thedarkhorsepod @thomasbsauer Unfortunately despite the high probability inference of fraud, courts will never even entertain this kind of evidence. The answer has to be in changing election laws and procedures.

@mtaibbi We requested absentee ballots in California some years ago, but US Postal Service “lost” them, then miraculously found them two weeks after the election.

@bennyjohnson The USPS unfortunately is not trustworthy even with the old kind of absentee ballots. Decades ago they “lost” our two requested ballots and miraculously found them two weeks after the election.