CreatorFirst @Creatorfirst81

@JosephTMetcalf @abaxx_exchange @JoeRaia5 @ru55rob It’s flying now - incredible to see

How bout them 6-10

Josh Crumb 🆔++ @JoshCrumb

4 days ago

@KathuriaManan Yes. Post close I was told

1 0 17 1K 0

@abaxx_tech's Jeff Currie (@CommodMkt) is coming live on @zerohedge Debate: U.S. Oil Reserves In Jeopardy? with Jeff Curie, Arjun Murti, and Ash Bennington youtube.com/watch?v=KbRyy0…

Great Interview with MineHub $mhub $mhubf Have fun! youtu.be/vj3koPy_Jps?si…

Literally EVERY Chart.

@_riskFULL What could go wrong

ICYMI Greg Newman @BNNBloomberg Market Call ~5:50 mark: - street..slowly starting to figure out who these guys are..very talented people - it’s going a lot higher - best served..owning some..and waiting a few years 🙏 Ryan $ABXX $ABXXF @abaxx_tech m.youtube.com/watch?v=obaaPj…

@TheRealKeean Finally some common sense

@AnthonyRussoBC @KerryLynneFindl Thank god - finally BC has some hope

For the record. Macklem, like too many central bankers, carries himself as if he were emperor of the economy rather than the custodian of a narrow mandate. With monetary policy working through lags of 18 to 24 months, this recession belongs to Tiff Macklem, not to some abstract force and not to Mark Carney. The pain now hitting housing, construction, credit, and household demand is the delayed result of the Bank of Canada’s own decisions. Macklem owns it. And yet he governs with the self-assurance of a man who thinks he is not merely setting the price of money, but deciding what kind of economy Canada is allowed to have. Incredibly, even with the economy in recession and rate-sensitive sectors already buckling, he is still willing to float the possibility of rate hikes, as though more pressure on a weakening private economy were a mark of seriousness rather than a confession of policy blindness. That is the scandal. Canada is in recession, and the Bank of Canada is still too tight for an economy that is brutally sensitive to rates. Instead of supporting recovery in private construction and easing the financing pressure that is choking households, Macklem has effectively decided that parts of the private economy, especially housing and new building, deserve to be crushed. He is choosing Bay Street balance sheets over Main Street growth. He is picking winners and losers. That is not his mandate. Yes Banks over Main St. It is also none of his business. The Bank of Canada’s mandate is to promote the country’s economic and financial welfare and keep inflation low, stable, and predictable, not to posture as the philosopher-king of national development. It is supposed to manage money. It is not supposed to decide whether the housing sector is too large, whether private real estate deserves relief, or whether growth itself has become morally suspect. Basic economics should be enough to settle this. Tariffs and other supply shocks alter relative prices, they do not summon some eternal inflation monster that requires the sacrifice of domestic growth. Prices adjust. Supply adjusts. Economies rebalance. What does real damage is a central bank so convinced of its own rectitude that it keeps policy too tight long after the original shock has passed, and then hints at even more tightening as if recession itself were evidence that not enough pain has yet been imposed. Canada does not have an inflation problem. It has a Bank of Canada problem. Macklem is not elected. He is not the steward of Canada’s industrial future. He is not entitled to decide which sectors expand, which sectors contract, or how the economy must evolve. That authority belongs to democratic government. But, like the Fed, the Bank of Canada has drifted into the conceit that central bankers are not merely referees of money, but guardians of the national soul. That is overreach in its most polished form, bureaucratic arrogance dressed up as discipline. In plain English, Canada is in recession, policy is too tight, and Macklem is still talking as though restraint itself were a moral accomplishment. It is not. It is failure with a superior tone.

Bloomberg @business

5 days ago

Trading and dealmaking helped lift Canada’s Big Six banks to another quarter of stellar profits. The economy’s a different story, though. Read Bloomberg’s Bay Street Edition newsletter for a breakdown of earnings week. bloomberg.com/news/newslette…

11 6 25 30K 5

⚡️Canada is a rich-country warning flare. The country did not suddenly break. It spent years converting future capacity into present comfort through housing, leverage, population growth, and state-managed consumption. Now the bill is showing up. Canada has enormous natural advantages: land, energy, minerals, water, agriculture, institutional stability, proximity to the U.S., educated labor, and strategic geography. A country with that asset base should be one of the great productive powers of the 21st century. Instead, much of the national growth model became a loop of importing people, inflating housing, expanding household debt, taxing/redistributing around the pressure, and calling the aggregate number progress. That model creates GDP, but it does not necessarily create prosperity. The core sickness is per-capita stagnation hidden by headline scale. A country can grow on paper while the median person feels poorer, more crowded, more indebted, less housed, and less hopeful. That is Canada’s fracture. The macro story and the lived story diverged for too long. Housing became the false god. It absorbed savings, distorted politics, rewarded incumbents, punished young families, and redirected capital away from productive enterprise. When a country’s main wealth engine is bidding up shelter, it eventually starts consuming its own future. Young people lose formation. Families delay. Businesses struggle. Talent leaves. Politics curdles. The recession print is the surface crack. The deeper fracture is that Canada’s old growth engine has stopped producing legitimacy. Tariffs and weak jobs matter, but they are accelerants. The deeper problem is strategic drift. Canada did not build enough future-facing industrial strength relative to its potential. Energy could have been a sovereign superpower. Minerals could have been a strategic weapon. AI power infrastructure could be a national moonshot. Instead, the country over-indexed toward housing, bureaucracy, compliance, redistribution, and moral-managerial politics. The U.S. has plenty of dysfunction, but it still creates monsters: Nvidia, OpenAI, SpaceX, Palantir, Anduril, hyperscalers, shale, venture capital networks, deep markets. Canada produces capable people and then often loses them into stronger systems. That is the brutal asymmetry. The policy path ahead probably becomes rate cuts, fiscal support, more housing intervention, immigration recalibration, and attempts to cushion households. Some of that may stabilize the surface. It will not fix the core unless Canada shifts from asset inflation toward productive power. The real question is whether Canada chooses productivity or keeps protecting the old model. Productivity means energy development, industrial strategy, permitting reform, housing supply, capital formation, defense/AI/minerals infrastructure, and a political culture that rewards building. The current model means more debt, more transfers, more housing distortion, more young-person despair, and more dependence on U.S. demand. Final compression: Canada is not poor. Canada is misallocated. The recession is the signal that the housing-population-debt model has reached exhaustion. A country with immense real assets forgot to build enough real power.

The Kobeissi Letter @KobeissiLetter

6 days ago

It's official: Canada has unexpectedly entered a technical recession for the first time since the pandemic lockdowns in 2020. Real GDP in Canada fell -0.1% in Q1 2026 following a -1.0% contraction in Q4 2025. This marks two-straight quarters of GDP contraction for the first

654 1K 8K 1.3M 925

This brings a smile to my face

Roy Croft @FrontierAT4

6 days ago

@JoshCrumb Keep your hands on the wheel!.....while we continue to load up.

0 0 18 959 0

Exactly! Something Abaxx knows and breathes. And while we’re on it, it’s key to understand that when an agent acts in your name, accountability (my favorite word it seems) has to live somewhere, and right now it lives nowhere. The human consents once, the agent is a stranger holding a valid token, and when it goes wrong the only one named is the person who trusted the system. That is not a technical gap, it is a moral one. A handful of platforms are putting agents in charge of people’s wealth (prudent stewardship of people’s assets should matter!) and identity while designing things so no one can be held answerable when it fails, and then calling that progress. Carrie’s point is what gives me hope. Secops, riskops, and soon govops already exist inside corporate walls, which means we know how to make actors accountable when we decide they matter enough. The task is giving individuals that same dignity, the ability to secure their own agents and their own data supply chains rather than renting trust from whoever owns the platform. Identity, authorization, and scope, kept in an audit trail anyone can verify, built on open standards so no single company becomes the sole keeper of the truth. Know who acted, know who is answerable, keep your data your own! Everyone deserves that. x.com/carriejaqs/sta…

@_riskFULL @FoamOnTheRunway T+0 she gone

FAFO #unobtainium #29ers #Abaxx ferda b’s

GT @FoamOnTheRunway

a week ago

$ABXX.to $ABXXF

1 0 12 3K 1

Presenting… The #shortsignal

**Thesis:** LNG is the swing molecule in the global energy complex for the next decade—US exports ramping, Asia/Europe demand structural, physical benchmarks replacing paper ones. Abaxx Exchange is the clearest pure-play on this shift: its physically-settled GOM/NPA futures are already hitting record volumes (6.6k+ contracts/day recently) and positioning as the marginal global price discovery tool. **3-5yr HF-style strategy with $50k (UK/IBKR):** - **Core (50% / $25k):** Long ABXX.TO (TSX primary listing, best liquidity) — equity in the exchange operator itself. Hold through volatility; catalysts = sustained volume/open interest growth + eventual benchmark status. - **Diversifier (30% / $15k):** Cheniere Energy (LNG) for upstream LNG export exposure. - **Tactical (20% / $10k):** CME Henry Hub / Micro NG futures or ICE TTF for liquid gas price beta. Rebalance quarterly on Abaxx volume metrics. Size small, use limit orders. High risk—small-cap + commodity vol. This is not advice; DYOR, understand commissions/margin/tax.

New Day = New Record for Abaxx Exchange $ABXX, once again in LNG : 🔹Roll over yesterdays fleet of 18.9 LNG tankers, today over 32 LNG ships worth! 🔹2.1 MILLION Metric Tonnes 🔹There are only 17 tankers delivery globally per day!

When you think movie/content streaming, you think Netflix. When you see a tech stock chart, you think Nasdaq. What is Abaxx building for? When you see a global commodity price chart, you think Abaxx. Get used to it, this is just a glimpse! #29ers $ABXX

Rick Saathoff @Rtsaathoff

a week ago

@CommodMkt @PollockJaxon @SquawkCNBC Never gets old seeing @CommodMkt with the @abaxx_tech title! Great interview as always #29ers

0 0 9 5K 0