Cheese&Pickle @CheeseHamRoll

🧵 MATT HANCOCK. A thread. 1/ While people were dying alone. While families buried loved ones without a goodbye. While the nation followed rules they were told would save lives. Matt Hancock was on WhatsApp. Doing business. 2/ The VIP lane — officially the High Priority Lane — was a secret fast-track system that gave politically connected companies 10x better odds of winning Covid contracts. In January 2022 the High Court ruled it unlawful. Source: Good Law Project v DHSC. 3/ Hancock alone referred at least four companies onto the VIP lane. Together with peers Lord Feldman, Lord Deighton and Lord Agnew, the four referred 60 suppliers. Source: Covid Inquiry witness statement of senior civil servant Max Cairnduff. 4/ Excalibur Healthcare. Hancock referred them via his personal email account — which No.10 repeatedly denied ministers were using for government business. Same day as his email: £25m contract. No tender. Excalibur later folded owing taxpayers £22m. Source: Byline Times FOI, April 2025. 5/ Those 2,700 ventilators Excalibur supplied on a £135m contract? None were ever used. The government auctioned them off. Machines that cost taxpayers £50,000 each were sold with bids starting at £100. Source: Good Law Project investigation, confirmed at Covid Inquiry. 6/ NKD International. Previously NKD Pizza International — it changed its name two days before winning its contract. Its director George Farha had donated £23,950 to the Conservative Party. Hancock received WhatsApp messages introducing Farha as "one of your party donators." Four days later: VIP lane deal. The director was later arrested on suspicion of fraud. Source: Byline Times, April 2025. 7/ Ecolog International. A Tory donor WhatsApped Hancock directly: "Hope you're well my dear friend." Hancock replied within hours. His department later issued a Letter of Intent. The contract was cancelled — but not before a £38.6m settlement fee was paid to Ecolog. £38.6m. For nothing. Source: Good Law Project, WhatsApp messages obtained via disclosure. 8/ Gina Coladangelo. Hancock's close friend — later revealed to be his affair partner. Appointed as a non-executive director of his own department, DHSC, on a £15,000 contract. No public record of the appointment. She attended confidential meetings with civil servants. Source: Multiple verified reports including Wikipedia summary of parliamentary record. 9/ His former pub landlord neighbour received a contract supplying tens of millions of vials for NHS Covid tests. No relevant experience documented. Source: The Guardian. 10/ When asked about all of this at the Covid Inquiry, Hancock called criticism of the VIP lane "wholly naive" and described it as "standard practice" in a "desperate situation." The High Court disagreed. 11/ IPSO — the press regulator — ruled it was not a breach of the Editors' Code to describe Hancock as: "A failed health secretary and cheating husband who broke the lockdown rules he wrote, helped enrich his mates via the infamous VIP PPE lane, and couldn't resist monetising the infamy he acquired." That's not a political opinion. That's a regulatory finding. 12/ One in five Covid contracts raised red flags for possible corruption. £8.7bn of PPE written off. £7.6bn lost to fraud and mismanagement. The Covid Corruption Commissioner is still investigating. The National Crime Agency is separately probing possible criminal offences. Nobody has been charged. 13/ People died following rules that the Health Secretary himself was breaking. While he WhatsApped donors. While he appointed his affair partner. While he sold off ventilators for £100 that cost £50,000 each. His constituents. Your money. Their lives. #HancockMustAnswer #CovidContracts

Last night scum stole the statue of my Grandfather Teddy Baldock Britain's youngest ever World Boxing Champion. The statue was unveiled outside the Langdon Park DLR Station in Poplar, East London. Years of work and a stunning work of art by the sculptor, the late Carl Payne will be sold for scrap and melted down. Please retweet in case we can recover it.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@grok @JoeyMannarinoUS

If energy is expensive, making things in a factory is expensive. If energy is expensive, producing food is expensive. If energy is expensive, doing basic things in the home is expensive. If energy is expensive, hospitals are expensive to run. If energy is expensive, government services are more expensive to run. If energy is expensive, taxes have to go up. If energy is expensive, employers will employ fewer people. If energy is expensive, people have less disposable income. If energy is expensive, people have less to spend on other things. If energy is expensive, every aspect of the economy will shrink. If, then, as a government, you policy is to make energy more expensive, you will not grow the economy. You will shrink it. You make living standards decline. You will make people poorer. You will cause financial instability and increase poverty. You will deter investment. You will punish the vulnerable. If that's what you're doing, it doesn't matter if you deregulate planning. Nobody will build new houses, factories or data centres. If you then reward the energy sector for not building power stations, in favour of renewables, then they will not build power stations. You are then in a full blown energy crisis and an economic doom loop. The damage cannot be repaired by putting up taxes. All you will do is shrink the economy further. You do not create boost the economy by creating "green jobs". Adding more labour overheads to the production of already expensive energy just makes energy more expensive. Building whether dependent energy generation that does not work at times when you most need energy will only make energy more expensive still. An eight year old can comprehend all of this. Politicians, Labour politicians especially, cannot. It's not that many of them can't. They just lack the curiosity to examine the issues. The is a price to pay for electing low intellect, lazy, virtue signalling narcissists. Add to thuis a surge of third world immigration, depressing Labour prices, you will then have an overburdened state, overburdened housing, overburdened infrastructure, and an overall decline in law and order. There are few things more dangerous than a surplus of unemployable redundant males. With it being government policy not to build power stations, and to not control the borders, the trajectory can only be decline and disorder. There is no possibility of growth. There is no possibility of repairing the social fabric. And as politicians should be aware from looking at the polls, there is no possibility of winning elections. I certainly don't mind if political parties have a deathwish. Lord knows, we are well rid of them. It's just a tragedy that they're determined to drag the country down with them into a permanent abyss. These are people who look upon the state of Britain and think the first order of business is to bureaucratise online retail to control the sale of kitchen utensils, and censor social media to prevent people from noticing that we're turning into a third-world shit tip, where feral savages are free to roam the country, raping and slaughtering children. The same people who will then complain about online abuse. They told us things could only get better, but there is no possibility of that. We were told that we would once again have "adults in the room", but it turns out they meant adult reatards. Since eight year olds can comprehend the basics better than they can, perhaps it's time to hand over the running of the country to them. They couldn't do a worse job.

Social media today has largely been dominated by the sentencing of the Southport killer. Some are saying his sentence of fifty two years is too lenient. Others are calling for the death penalty. What is certain is that this creature will never again see the light of day. There remains some debate online as to whether this was a terrorist attack. The presence of al-Qaeda material in his home does not necessarily point to an Islamist motive. I happen to agree the court’s view, as I understand it, that this does not constitute a terror attack by the current definition. Rather, it is a senseless slaying. I do find, however, that the choice of victim is always indicative of something. There was much bickering after the Madegberg attack around Christmas as to what motivated the killer, but ultimately, he chose to attack white people at a Christmas event. Revealed preference, you might say. That the Southport killer chose white infant girls ought to explain his psychology. An evil man who hates what he cannot have. White females. That the courts have ruled out an terrorist motive frees the government to pin the blame on virtually anything else, in what has become a grim ritual following events of this kind. The media would have it that Amazon online retail is responsible, while those who always favour more censorship (in any circumstances) look to blame social media. Anything but address the core issues. The Guardian reports that between October 2019 and May 2022, police were called to the family home five times due to concerns about Rudakubana’s behaviour. Each time they referred him to local safeguarding officials. He completed a youth justice referral order in 2021 and stopped engaging with mental health services in February 2023. Despite the involvement of all these agencies, and a knowledge that Rudakubana was violent and “obsessed” with genocides, he continued spiralling. Shut away in his bedroom, he spent hours researching extreme violence online. As early as 2021, he downloaded an al-Qaida textbook, which is banned under UK terrorism laws. A year later he began ordering the items to make the deadly toxin ricin. He bought weapons from Amazon using software to hide his identity. Here we arrive at point one. (And let’s stick to what is indisputable). The vast estate of agencies which exist to prevent this kind of thing had ample opportunity to do so, yet comprehensively failed. There is the expectation that no-one will be held meaningfully accountable. It also stands that local authorities and the government attempted to manage the narrative by withholding information on false pretences, aggravating, if not causing last year’s riots. This is part of a pattern of dysfunction which has significant overlaps with the grooming scandal. There was maximum effort on the part of the establishment to bury any details that might just cause people to conclude that multiculturalism is not the rainbow paradise we’ve been led to believe it would be. The bottom line, though, is that Rudakubana should never have been here. There was no reasonable grounds for granting his parents asylum. Were it not for our dysfunctional asylum system, this attack would never have taken place. What matters here especially is that this is not an isolated incident. Maladapted men of foreign origin going on a knife murder sprees is becoming part of the everyday fabric of news. Just today, The Times reports that five were injured in such an attack in Croydon. This, on the same day as a black man dragging a thirteen year old schoolgirl into a car and raping her. We are asked by courts and the authorities not to speculate but speculate is all we can do since no useful information is ever conveyed in media reports, and there is still an establishment determination to memory-hole incidents which do not fit the narrative. If it’s something they can peg on the “far right” then we never hear the last of it. If a perpetrator is black, arab or south asian, they’ll bury it without follow-up. This veil of secrecy, more than any other factor, explains last year’s riots. The public have had enough of being kept in the dark and taken for fools. The government can crack down on social media and demand the removal of extremist material. It can bureaucratise the purchase of kitchen utensils, but it’s not going to stop feral foreigner from raping and killing innocents. There was a time when I would look to more nuanced explanations and solutions, but we can no longer afford to ignore the cold truth that Britain simply did not have violence of this nature until mass immigration happened. I simply concede the obvious; that the mass immigration of the last decade (at least) must be reversed. We learn from X today that one in twelve people living in London is an illegal immigrant. Data reveals almost 600,000 of the capital's residents have no right to be in the UK. Without additional legislation, and basic enforcement of existing law, Britain could make a substantial dent in the housing crisis and the crime problem. There is no reason why we should tolerate being a flop house to the third world. We are told by the great and the good that these things just happen, and that there’s a “limit to what we can do” but that is seemingly taken as a arationale by the establishment to do nothing at all. There is plenty we can do though, not least removing the threats. For sure, it will not eliminate all risk of such attacks, but if we remove predatory third world men, we dramatically cut down the odds. There is no economic or social rationale for them being here in the first place. What they mean when they say “limit to what we can do” is that there is a limit to what we can do within the liberal progressive moral and legal framework. If, though, British children are being slaughtered at the hands of feral beasts, it is time to ditch that moral and legal framework. It simply does not serve us. As with grooming, this issue is not going to go away. The central issue is that the establishment would rather do nothing at all, or fiddle around the edges, than admit that “multiculturalism” is an abject failure. As much as anything, such an admission would require them to do something radical, which is too much to ask of people who fundamentally do not care. Keir Starmer spent all of nineteen seconds laying flowers in Southport before swanning off to a celebrity drinks party. Ultimately grooming, and senseless slayings such as this, only really affect white working class people. A demographic our ruling class couldn’t give less of a shit about.

Seven questions: 1) Are British politicians importing an alien culture and an alien people in such numbers as to effectively render the young native British an ethnic minority in the near future? 2) Is the core ideology and culture of the millions of imported people antithetical to the core ideology and culture of modern Western democracies? 3) Have British politicians introduced legislation conferring an inferior status upon the native British and a superior status / protected class to the imported people and their alien culture? 4) If so, would not logic, the nature of man, and much chronicled history suggest this will inevitably lead to ever-increasing racial/cultural division and a highly probable physical clash of civilisations directly affecting our children and grandchildren? 5) If so, would it be fair to say our politicians are engaged in an ideological alliance with an imported foreign invasion and are thus guilty of treason in the specific legal definition? 6) If so, would it be fair to say British politicians are engaged in a genocidal war against their own citizens, according to the U.N. definition of genocide? 7) If all this is true, has such a perverse, abnormal and unnatural situation ever before existed in the known history of mankind?

Require labelling of beef & dairy from cows fed with additives to reduce methane Its time to stop Bill Gates interfering with our food supplies. We believe that all beef and dairy products from cows whose feed contains additives used for reducing methane emissions, should be labelled to state that this is the case, so the public can decide whether to consume or not, instead of consuming unknowingly. We believe it should be our choice. This includes all eateries offering beef & dairy, we believe they should state on their menu if the products contain such additives. We think that we the people should have the right to choose what we consume, not anyone else. We are concerned there could be a risk of adverse effects, just like with many products. We think there is no harm in having beef & dairy labelled. Transparency is fair. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7052…

🚨 Banaras Hussain, a member of a prolific grooming gang in Rotherham who raped and tortured victims as young as 11 will be released from prison tomorrow. He was sentenced to spend 19 years in prison in 2016, he has served less than half of his sentence. His licence conditions include no contact with myself, children and grandchildren plus an exclusion zone of all Rotherham. He will initially be released to supported accommodation and supervised by the Probation Service until 9/6/2034. Hussain's brother, and the ringleader, Arshid Hussain was imprisoned for 35 years, brother Basharat Hussain, was handed 25 years, brother Sageer Hussain, was sentenced to 19 years and their uncle, Qurban Ali, was jailed for 10 years.

Not long ago, my home was dawn raided by 8 @gmpolice officers. Their actions, triggered by senior members of @AndyBurnhamGM Labour Party run council in #Oldham, marked the beginning of a nightmare. Ask him. He won’t dare deny it. Nor will he be able to explain why my bail conditions amounted to six months of house arrest. I posed no risk of fleeing the country. I have no criminal record. Rather, I have a decorated history of public service. It took me three long years to emerge a free man. In that time, I lost my mother. Her final words with me were of fear. Fear of what might happen to me if I was imprisoned. Fear that the gangsters in the cars following me home would attack me whilst my daughter was strapped in the child seat in the back. Can you imagine that? Unlike the gangsters connected to @Shah_Arooj’s administration, I do not come from a family of criminals. When I refused to plead guilty, the system seemed to close in. My solicitors, a large law firm, pulled out of representing me. Every law firm I approached in Greater Manchester turned me away. I still have the rejection emails. On my first trial date, I stood alone, without legal representation. It was only by the grace of God that I eventually secured a legal team. One by one, the cases against me fell apart. The final collapse came when the @CPSUK witness fled the country before trial. Incredibly, the CPS tried to proceed without allowing my legal team to cross-examine this so-called victim. Their entire case was built on her fabricated transcript of a YouTube video. A video neither @gmpolice nor @CPSUK had bothered to watch. In the end, the Judge threw the case out. What happened to me was not an isolated failure. It was a coordinated attempt to silence me. I am certain in my belief that @uklabour, @OldhamCouncil, @gmpolice & @CPSUK all conspired with each other and went to extraordinary lengths to make an example of me. They did not act alone. They were aided by the local media. @MENnewsdesk lined up outside court to take my photograph and publish details of what I had allegedly done. They were not alone, when I was first arrested, @TheOldhamTimes published a malicious, fabricated headline claiming I was linked to a CSE investigation. When I spoke out against the press, @gmpolice dawn raided my home again. I was falsely arrested for 'inciting rape'. I again pled NOT GUILTY. The allegation was completely fabricated and the case against me disappeared. The last time I was arrested, again via yet another dawn raid, @gmpolice as good as admitted that they were trying to secure a fast track decision by @CPSUK to have me put on remand - imprisoned - so that I could not campaign in the lead up to the local elections. This time, they had arrested me for allegedly being a racist. The truth was, I had reported the crime. I was the actual victim. They kept me locked up all day before being finally forced to release me. Desperate to silence me, Islamists with direct links to @uklabour had doxxed my home address and openly incited violence against me. I can only guess that their motives were to protect the cover-up of gang rapes of little White girls in Oldham. I reported every case to @gmpolice. Instead of arresting them, they arrested me. I understand why so many others plead guilty. The weight of the State bearing down is overwhelming. But each time I look in the mirror, I remind myself that I stood firm. Despite everything @AndyBurnhamGM’s infiltrated police force threw at me, I am still here. To those facing similar struggles, hold onto hope. The system may be powerful, but the truth is stronger.@AndyBurnhamGM politically infiltrated police force tried to silence me for daring to object to the gang rape of little children. Yet here I still am.

Bovaer is being added to BEEF and MILK because it is thought to prevent climate change. This is based on woke science. The truth is, it might harm your health in many ways. I’ll explain.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Religious tolerance can only be applied to tolerant religions. Otherwise it’s not tolerance. It’s submission.

🚨 NEW: The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, worked as a ‘complaints support manager’ and not as an economist in a bank according to a former colleague. She resigned after being exposed ‘doing Labour council business’ under the guise of frequent doctor’s and dental appointments.

I wrote the words below in April, about the UK left, and I'm retweeting them today for the benefit of some of the numbskulls in my mentions. Women like me, and there are a lot of us, aren't and never have been far-right. We simply want the left to wake the hell up, because we're watching it do its utmost to alienate people it used to represent. I'm not saying Trump's win was down to the gender stuff - I'm not an American voter, so can't judge. In any case, the Labour Party won the last UK election and they've embraced gender identity ideology whole-heartedly (although they won against a Tory government so enfeebled and unpopular it would have been miraculous if they hadn't, and their popularity since gaining office has plummeted.) What I do know is that millions of women in the UK and across the developed world are extremely angry about men in women's sport, men in women's jails and the erosion of single-sex spaces. Parents are angry at being demonised because they don't want their troubled kids to undergo irreversible medical treatments of extremely questionable benefit. People are sick to the back teeth of being bullied and threatened for refusing to embrace an elitist, academia-generated ideology that's having severe real world consequences. Large swathes of the left continue to be threatening and abusive to anybody who resists their attempts to impose ideological language or bully them out of wrongthink. Leftist activists jeer and sneer at erstwhile female allies for the crime of believing biological sex is real and matters. And leftist leaders still appear more interested in sucking up to gender activists than - to take a topical example in the UK - female nurses whose crime is not wanting to undress in front of a fully intact male. So to those screaming 'bigot' and 'fascist' at me, you should know two things. Firstly, I'm completely indifferent to your disapproval, as I'd have thought you'd have realised by now. Secondly, and far more importantly, the only thing more harmful to your cause than your pseudo-religious belief in gender identities is your astounding, self-righteous arrogance.

Trigger warning *not everyone will want to look at this ahead of the Budget. But a list of things taxpayers have been charged on - which you can refer to when Rachel Reeves/ Labour/ whoever says there was "austerity" or they had to make tough economic choices. 🧵

UPDATE- Anyway … I’ve been thinking about what to do now. I mean, what do you do when your reputation has been completely destroyed by the press and the trolls? Should I just be cowed and shut up? Should I have learned my lesson and keep my opinions to myself? … after all that was the advice. For a while I floated, worried, confused, deeply upset, with no real idea about what would come next. And then slowly the hate mail was replaced by support mail, strangers sending beautiful cards, friends rallying round and unexpectedly, people who rarely agree with me began to email. And they all said the same thing. “Don’t stop” I have gradually started to post again, yes, frightened. But when you have nothing left to lose except your voice, it becomes even more important and even more precious. I realised that they were still trying to take that final thing away from me. Through my fear. I decided not to be afraid ….

Eleven years ago today my story was published in The Times newspaper. I named not only Arshid Hussain as the man that groomed and exploited me but I also named Labour politician, Jahangir Akhtar and police officer PC Ali for their involvement in a no ‘prosecution deal’. My story opened the criminal investigations which is now the biggest child abuse investigation in our history and still ongoing but it also commissioned the Alexis Jay report which showed 1400 children were groomed, abused, raped, trafficked and tortured and authorities turned a blind eye. The next few days will also mark the ten year anniversary of the report being published. Not one professional has ever been held to account for failing us. I later went on to successfully sue South Yorkshire Police and Rotherham Borough Council for negligence. I also fought and won against CICA. Professionals and others have tried everything in their power to stop me. They have tried to have me arrested on countless occasions, served me with gagging orders and even tried sueing me to silence me. They failed. I still to this day have to fight the system to protect me, my son and grandson. It should never be this hard for victims of abuse and exploitation. My fight continues m.youtube.com/watch?v=a9k5o5…

LIVE: Rally For Reform UK

Here’s a call to action !! #BritainNeedsReform