Patriot BioFriz 🇺🇸 @BioFriz

@RevJonnyT @LangmanVince A lot of people will carry a 10mm. Works well.

Watching the right debate over Iran is depressing. My own position from the beginning has been the following: -Iran is a threat. -I don’t know what intel Trump has. -I generally trust Trump when it comes to deployment of the US military. -I don’t support another ground war/nation building operation in the middle east. -I would love to see the Iranian regime toppled, but it has to be through an organic uprising, which can be supported by outside forces but cannot be the main effort. -I recognize that Trump laid out objectives none of which was regime change. -This conflict will be judged based on the ability to achieve stated objectives. Since the MOU has come out my position has been the following: -I don’t love this MOU but it’s a framework for negotiation not a final deal. -I don’t trust the Islamic government of Iran, but it’s clear at this point that the regime is probably not going to fall due to an internal uprising. -A negotiated peace which includes necessary and transparent safeguards against Iran having nuclear weapons and which greatly diminishes their support of proxies would be a significant achievement. (But that remains to be seen.) -It appears to me that the internal conditions necessary to successfully replace the Islamic government do not currently exist but could be developed over years. -While Israel has every right to defend itself against attacks, it will have to consider its security interests against current objectives and the US desire to extricate itself from the conflict. -The US midterms play a significant role in the overall strategy because they will have the ability to impact not only this conflict but the rest of the Trump term. There’s more, and I’ve done several podcasts on the topic, but each time I have tried to be fair and intellectually honest in my assessment balancing my belief that Iran is a threat to American interests and my desire to avoid more foreign conflicts and address systemic issues at home. Reasonable people can disagree on my analysis and conclusions and I have no problem with good faith debate on the topic of which I have had many. But once again I am watching as the right begins to adopt the tactics of the left to try and make their points. Instantly accusing anyone who disagrees as being a “paid shill.” Automatically assuming ill intentions. Ad hominem attacks. And the political equivalent of allowing a disagreement over a “non doctrinal topic” to become grounds for excommunication and claims of betrayal, treachery and heresy. Sentiments like : I agree with you on almost everything, but now you’re just a hack. Are becoming common. Think about that statement. It equates to “Nick, I have watched and listened to your analysis on just about every topic and agreed with you…but because I disagree with you on this topic, IT MUST BE that you are actually just a huge shill and horrible person.” Or…and just hear me out…it could be that generally like minded people sometimes do have serious disagreements on certain topics. In such cases it is usually a question of data, perspective or priorities, not ill intention. Which is to say it is not a fundamental difference of opinion on truth or ultimate objectives, but primarily one of perspective. The real question is whether or not the analysis they used to get to their conclusions or opinions is reasonable. If the right proves incapable of honest debate without immediately turning on one another or adopting the tactics of the left in how we adjudicate disagreement, we are in a great deal of trouble.

@WiscoMilTicer81 @TheLaikYobaz lol I’m pretty sure we have more serious things to be worried about than this. No matter your political background, complaining about this is a waste of time and energy.

@chilling_cold @KillaKreww It’s worth what people are willing to pay for it not what it cost Adidas to make.

@EBHxLee @AmiriKing @washghost1 Did you miss his point? He knows the white guy was right. He was being sarcastic calling them royals. Man this flew over your head.

@pastapeddler @SaveOurSheriff Women’s

@SleepyNasaa @wishmeluxury @JeromeEnLaCasa @SomaKazima2 They aren’t Mormon. They were excommunicated and are their own twisted offshoot that do NOT follow recognized or approved doctrine

@AOh64635563 @Banana3Stocks @LauraLoomer @nvidia @Tsinghua_Uni You don’t understand China very well if you think it is “just a university”

@clintoptions $SPY

@rotas_debra @rgbrod116 @gofishh77 This is an older video and isn’t AI

@BigFootMau5 @MattWallace888 Sepsis or something like bacterial meningitis

@JackBoHare @brivael Your arguement just got completely destroyed by @brivael

Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle. Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années. Les chiffres bruts. 1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité. 2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%. 1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce. Qui a fait ça ? Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ». Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme. Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe. La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique. Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz. Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen. La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées. ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat. La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.

Gilles Gautier 🐰 🇫🇷🌻☣🪔2° 💸 @JackBoHare

3 months ago

@brivael Avoir une sensibilité de gauche est largement compréhensible voire nécessaire. On ne peut pas laisser crever des personnes de faim. Le social au USA est juste un désastre. Mais aujourd'hui les gens qui se disent de gauche ne sont pas de gauche. C'est un essaim de criquet, des

257 35 301 739K 79

@34base @coachkatykat Agreed. Well said

@NullandV0ided @LouisCapet11 @_3emeOeil This is pastrami and this is exactly how it is supposed to look

@PancakesNChaos @hellspatisserie You will learn one day. Remember this

@clefabledude @hellspatisserie You can deny it all you want, but porn is detrimental in many ways. It is truly evil. Most just can’t see it because the younger generations grew up with it unfortunately. It is truly sad.

@PancakesNChaos @hellspatisserie You can deny it all you want, but porn is detrimental in many ways. It is truly evil. Most just can’t see it because the younger generations grew up with it unfortunately. It is truly sad.

@maddenifico Another performance. Well done. People are so fake

@BaiterMcBait @catturd2 lol, just look at their posts. All they post are constant stories. They are just a story teller.