Higgins: He said the founders never anticipated this volume of illegals Raskin: There was no immigration law when the constitution was adopted. In fact, the only illegals in the country, at least according to the native population, were the people writing the constitution
@Acyn I love Jamie Ranskin , he is the most knowledgeable person when it comes to the Constitution, wish we had more like him
@Acyn Higgins is no match for Jamie Raskin.
@Acyn Yet the founders could have imagined the type of firearms available today? That logic blows up their whole 2A argument.
@Acyn The founders never anticipated someone walking into a school with more firepower than an 18th century battalion, but whatever.
@Acyn So the founding fathers were for open borders. Thank you for admitting it Mr. Higgins.
Raskin is correct; I can see now why Republicans want to re-write History. If they keep the fact that only the Natives are LEGAL in this Country, then that means all the other races can be deported by Natives. Now, we know of course that won't happen, but just think about the implications of what Raskin has discovered. May be banning History books is a better idea than re-writing them; any Republican Politician is free to use my idea. Democrats are prohibited because they are not dumb enough to run with that stupid suggestion.
Acyn, why did they not anticipate a large volume of illegals; illegals were arriving from Europe and other countries by the boat loads. How do you think they manage to defeat all those Native tribes (with the exception of the Little Big Horn Battle)? They had more illegals on their side.