Christophe de Dinechin @zanyware

BACKROOMS 2: SPENCER PRATT AUDITS THE VOTE

Her own district, which she serves on the council, didn't vote for Raman. If her own constituents wouldn't even support her, why would anyone else? Now she's magically "surging" while the rest of the field is flat? This is election fraud, plain and simple.

One was treated vastly differently than the other. Apparently some lives matter more than others.

@lechochretien Pendant qu’on profane les églises parisiennes, Dieu s’affiche à l’extérieur. Aimez Jesus comme Il vous aime, toujours et partout.

🇫🇷⚪ 𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗛 — Des catholiques ont célébré la Fête-Dieu avec une procession eucharistique dans le centre-ville de Tours.

@ai_qube_fr @LaColitruche On dirait la Californie

Si l'Arménie vote pour le candidat "pro-Russe", Macron et l'Europe invalideront le résultat. Ça me rappelle la blague de la mamie qui vivait dans une dictature et qui, en rentrant chez elle, s’est rendu compte qu’elle n’avait pas mis le bulletin du dictateur dans l’urne, mais celui d’un opposant. Par peur de représailles, elle retourne au bureau de vote pour demander à corriger son choix. On lui répond alors : ne vous inquiétez pas, on l’a déjà corrigé pour vous.

@RealJamesWoods The problem is the remedy against state-sponsored cheating

CALIFORNIA ELECTIONS FRAUD CASH FOR BALLOTS PART I: Homeless Bribed with Cash & Drugs In Exchange For Registering To Vote & Signing Election Petitions Caught On Tape Undercover On Skid Row In California. “You can just put Pinocchio Lane.” California NGOs Encourage Fake Addresses To Homeless People To Sign Petitions & Register Voters, A State & Federal Felony. Footage Shows 28 Instances Of Cash Changing Hands For Ballot Signatures & Voter Registration Forms. Many of the petitioners had no understanding of the petitions’ purpose they were advertising. Circulators also instructed individuals to use fake addresses. “Oh, you can just fake an address.” Weingart Center, which received hundreds of millions in public funding, is on tape directing people to where the fraudulent petitioners are located, and directing homeless individuals to petitioners & coaching plausible deniability. “See they say ignorance is no excuse for the law. But a lot of times, I have to say ‘I didn’t know, I had no idea.’” We encountered 28 instances of petitioners offering cash, cigarettes, and marijuana for signatures on petitions. Weingart employees advised: “See they say ignorance is no excuse for the law. But a lot of times, I have to say ‘I didn’t know, I had no idea.’” All happening outside taxpayer-funded housing organizations. Weingart CEO earned $432,000 before resigning from the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency. James O’Keefe and the OMG Team went undercover on Skid Row, posing as homeless individuals. On hidden cameras, petitioners admitted they are paid $7–$10 per signature, sometimes earning $1,000 or more per day, collecting signatures from individuals with minimal knowledge of what they were signing. “$7 a signature, $5 a signature, $10 a signature.” “We gon’ give you $2.” Populus Inc., a political consulting firm, was circulating petitions funded by @Uber, @Delta, @United, and the American Hotel & Lodging Association (@AHLA). On camera, one petitioner said, “We have one that taxes billionaires 5%. One-time tax. 5% and that’s gonna go towards healthcare.” Other petitions sought to overturn LA’s $30 minimum wage for hotel and airline workers. Paying per signature and encouraging fake addresses violates federal and state election law and is proof of fraud happening in California. Weingart employees were caught directing the homeless to the location of the petitioners and coaching them on plausible deniability. Intake coordinator Jason Warren told an undercover journalist exactly where and when to find them: “Most time they be right across the street, under that tree… Monday through Friday.” In 2016, nine individuals were arrested on Skid Row for exchanging cash and cigarettes for signatures; in 2019 they were charged on 14 counts under the exact same California Elections Code section. Yet when confronted, nearby LAPD officers dismissed the activity as “a civil lawsuit.” “Paying per signature violates state election law and is evidence of election fraud in California,” the investigation concludes. On Skid Row, we captured conduct on tape that violates Federal Law 52 U.S. Code §10307 and state law California Election Code §18603. Part II coming soon. @CAgovernor @MayorOfLA @AGPamBondi @TheJusticeDept @NathanHochmanDA @GovPressOffice @LADAOffice @CASOSVote @USAttyEssayli @GavinNewsom Follow Citizen Justice League @ctznjusticelg A network of citizen journalists exposing corruption and demanding accountability for America YT: youtube.com/@citizenjustic… IG: instagram.com/citizenjustice… FB: facebook.com/share/1CdcJb1b… TikTok: tiktok.com/@citizenjustic… Paid partnerships with: American Independence Gold: Free Extra Gold & Silver with Qualifying Purchases. Go to OKEEFEMEDIAGOLD.com

Ce qui se passe en Californie en ce moment est extraordinairement grave. Il s’agit de fraude électorale à une échelle industrielle. La Californie n’est plus une démocratie, et certains font remarquer que ce type d’ajustement statistiquement improbable remonte au moins à l’élection de Kamala Harris en 2010. Sous Obama.

Jeremy Padawer @JeremyCom

a day ago

The odds of Nithya Raman receiving 40% of the vote yesterday are “LESS LIKELY than picking ONE GRAIN OF SAND on Earth dozens of times in a row.” I believe elections tend to be fair. Someone help me make sense of math that seems impossible… I ASKED CHATGPT - “What is the

314 2K 5K 913K 814

Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, literally said he had a “break the glass” option for the Emergency case of Spencer Pratt Winning. We don’t live in a democracy anymore. This quote last resort“ is just fraud. It’s a simple as that.

The Los Angeles Mayoral Primary makes NO SENSE So far, 723,000 votes have been counted, which they say is 83% of the expected vote. This translates to an expected 870,000 votes total. But the 2022 Mayoral Primary had only 646,000 votes cast. LA's population has actually DECREASED slightly since 2022. So why on earth are they expecting the 2026 Primary to have almost 35% more votes cast than in 2022? With FEWER people living in LA???

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

ChatGPT can’t find a single example of a 3rd place candidate surging, days AFTER Election Day, to overtake 2nd place. It couldn’t find 1 example in all of American history. That’s what’s happening with Nithya Raman & Spencer Pratt. Los Angeles has 3rd world country elections.

The odds of Nithya Raman receiving 40% of the vote yesterday are “LESS LIKELY than picking ONE GRAIN OF SAND on Earth dozens of times in a row.” I believe elections tend to be fair. Someone help me make sense of math that seems impossible… I ASKED CHATGPT - “What is the statistical likelihood that 40% of votes from a “new batch” of ballots go to a candidate who received 24% of votes from all other batches that represented 95% of counted electorate. Give me a % odds.” The Answer (Part 1) - “Assuming the candidate’s “true” share is 24%, the odds that a random new batch lands at 40% or higher depends on batch size: 50 ballots 0.88% 100 ballots 0.028% 200 ballots 0.00004% 500 ballots ~0.00000000000018% 1,000 ballots ~0.0000000000000000000000000035%” My follow up - “Assume 40,000 ballots. Are the odds one in a billion? One in a trillion? Worse? This seems to be happening in Los Angeles Mayor’s race between Mayor Bass, Spencer Pratt and Nithya Raman.” The Answer (Part 2) - “If the 40,000-ballot batch were drawn from the same population that produced 24% support in the other 95% of votes, then seeing 40% support in that batch would be far beyond “one in a billion” or “one in a trillion.” 75 standard deviations is in an entirely different universe. The probability is approximately: ~10⁻¹²²⁰ or about 1 chance in 10¹²²⁰ That’s a number with roughly 1,220 zeros after the 1. Statistically, if the batch were truly a random sample of the same electorate, the odds are so small that statisticians would effectively treat the event as impossible. The usual conclusion would not be “wow, what a lucky fluctuation,” but rather that the batch is not representative of the earlier ballots—for example, it came from a different geographic area, voting method, demographic group, or subset of voters. So yes: much worse than one in a billion, much worse than one in a trillion, and vastly smaller than any probability encountered in ordinary statistical analysis.” My follow up - “More grains of sand on earth than the likelihood of this?” The Answer (Part 3) - “Yes. Much, much more. Estimated grains of sand on Earth are often put around 10¹⁸ to 10²⁰. Your odds example was roughly: 1 in 10¹²²⁰ So this is not just “less likely than picking one grain of sand on Earth.” It’s more like picking the right grain of sand on Earth correctly over and over again dozens of times in a row.” Sincerely, Jeremy Padawer Pacificpalisades.com @spencerpratt @BoredElonMusk @Hotshot_Movie @415FirePhoto #losangeles #la #fyp #mayor

I’m the only one who is not remotely disturbed by the Democrat fraud unfolding in the Los Angeles mayor’s race. And why? Because I knew to a certainty that statistically impossible cheating would take place AGAIN. I said it, I was right, and I’m done with it. America is lost.

Bill Mitchell @mitchellvii

18 hours ago

READ THIS POST: Raman getting 40% of the 6/6 ballot drop is statistically IMPOSSIBLE. Not just improbable, IMPOSSIBLE.

224 3K 13K 876K 543

Here is: the single most shocking piece of evidence in the entirety of the November 3, 2020 election: Statistically impossible: “They were all in sequence. These are absentee ballots and mail-in ballots. They cannot be in sequence—2232 cannot have 2233 next to it—because they are mailed in and come in all different numbers.”

Elon Musk @elonmusk

11 hours ago

💯

2K 10K 68K 18.0M 1K

🔥🚨BREAKING: Hundreds of thousands of Americans are accusing California Democrats of stealing the Mayoral election after Decision Desk HQ just projected Nithya Raman to win the second of two spots in the CA Los Angeles Mayor Nonpartisan Primary defeating Spencer Pratt in the process thanks to “last minute” mail-in ballots that appeared. TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet had the best response: “A woman with absolutely zero following, no groundswell of support, and no name ID absolutely killed it in mail-in voting in Los Angeles. It's just the way this state counts ballots, guys!! Free PSA: If you don't want us to assume cheating, maybe make it a little less obvious.”

FLASHBACK: in 2010, weeks after Election Day, Kamala Harris won California’s attorney general race by less than 1% after a surge of mail-in ballots from Los Angeles County erased her opponent’s lead.

Join Tesla if you want to solve real-world AI

Tesla AI @Tesla_AI

a day ago

Real-world AI is about solving for the edge case, not the average case

305 514 4K 6.0M 251

🔴Nuit Blanche, idées noires et profanations ➡️comment le diocèse de Paris a-t-il pu autoriser cela ? ➡️ Si les critiques se concentrent souvent sur Barbara Butch ou sur la mairie de Paris, la véritable question est ailleurs ➡️ Pourquoi les autorités diocésaines ont-elles accepté que des églises soient intégrés à une telle programmation ? @dioceseparis @Eglisecatho #nuitblanche2026 Images TRIBUNE CHRETIENNE