Charlie Jackson @wiredcoach

Two things. Why aren’t you just doing this and making money instead of writing about it? And you want to charge four dollars, so I’ll do it since it’s no work, and charge three dollars. And then the next person will do it and charge two dollars. And then the next person will do it and charge one dollar. And then the next person will do it for free. So much for making money like this.

Gotta love these bait-and-switch folks who are all over the place. "Check out our free XYZ . . . oh, and then check out our pricing."

@DawnsMission Indeed. I learned all about this in the last year. My wife and I stopped taking statins. Her neuropathy in her lower legs has greatly improved.

@sairahul1 So what I don’t understand is, why are you taking the time to write these articles, instead of building 10 of these that produce 10 K a month, and then sit back and collect all that money every month?

After we launched version 1 of our product, a VC who I knew personally passed on investing in us. Macromedia bought us, then Adobe bought Macromedia primarily to get our product (this is a fact). The product: Macromedia/Adobe Flash. My point: VCs often can’t see the future very well. In their defense, who can?

We all know how lame the mainstream media is. There is a lot going on right now, and they only see one thing at a time. This is a very good analysis of a bigger picture, tying various things together. tanviratna.substack.com/p/the-iran-war…

150 million users and they couldn't figure out how to be profitable. Who the hell was on that board of directors? theverge.com/games/903885/1…

Lack of basic medical stuff is a fact. In the 90s, I attended an international shooting match in L.A. The Cubans were trading cigars for dollars so they could buy inhalers, Preparation H, etc. I heard about this and took the five athletes to a drug store and told them, buy anything and everything you want. They did not buy a single frivolous thing. I was glad I could help them get some basics they really needed.

When someone tries to tell you that AI is approaching human intelligence, please just laugh in their face. And here's another example: the other day I asked an AI to summarize points number 1 and number 3. It did numbers 1 and 2. techspot.com/news/111485-hu…

Well, I can't tell you how shocked I am that Chinese companies are stealing. /sarcasm off/ And why do they always steal? Because, for some unknown reason, they can't innovate. anthropic.com/news/detecting…

@VigilantFox Believe what you want, but after learning of the Midwestern Doctor and reading a lot of that content, and especially about statins, my wife and I both stopped taking statins. My cholesterol number used to be considered ideal.

@eurofounder I was in Germany once as a member of a U.S. team there for a competition. One of our athletes got struck by a car, cut badly but not life threatening. The Germans refused to treat him until our head of delegation went to the hospital with proof of insurance.

@sachnk Whoa, that interview with Louis Rossetto, the founder of Wired magazine, is fire. He's one of the most intelligent guys I've ever met.

This is actually worth knowing about. I remember reading that it was good to say please, and things like that, to ChatGPT. Now, not so much. futurism.com/artificial-int…

@StartupArchive_ Indeed, that change over time has been underreported.

FYI. I had a biopsy for Prostate cancer. I think, but can't know for sure, that this is how it got out of the prostate. A tech at the hospital slyly hinted this was likely. As for simply believing everything a Dr tells you, here's a cautionary story: Prostate was removed. Cancer reappeared later . Radiation. Reappeared again later, low PSA. But here's the kicker: the Urologic Surgeon, still my doctor at that time, said: wait for PSA to get to 20, then start hormone suppression. And, refused to give me a referral to an oncologist. Refused. But, nowadays, we can all research this stuff. I found out immediately that this was wrong. I got two outside 2nd opinions from well known oncologists (cost me $500 each to talk to them for an hour). Conclusion: I needed an oncologist immediately, and needed to being doing certain things before PSA got to 4. Then I was able to push my system and get an oncologist. Started hormone suppression immediately and after PSMA Pet scan, which located 2 locations in bone, got immediate radiation. 3 years later, still at 0 PSA but average is 2 to 3 years. When suppression fails, and it reappears, no doubt the next thing they say will be: chemotherapy. I have already decided I will not do chemotherapy, but instead will try an alternative that is getting more and more visibility: Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. Reports are that this is working for 75% of people, but it has not been studied. Because, you know, there's no money using re-purposed, inexpensive drugs. The point of all this: You must do your own research, find out everything you can, and make the best informed decision that you can. Simply relying on one Dr who tells you XYZ is not a formula for success. Best of luck in your journey.

@chrislevan24 i-DOM. Hint: i is for intelligent DOM. If you don’t know what DOM is, just look it up.

@Matt_Pinner Steal intellectual property.

Yes, I should rely on that Urologic Surgeon of mine who said, when my prostate cancer re-appeared, wait until my PSA got over 20 to do anything, and refused to give me a referral to an oncologist. Fortunately for me, I could do a lot of research on my own, which said do (some things) by the time it reached 4. And I could afford to pay for two second opinions outside my system who verified this. But if I had simply “relied on” my Dr’s medical advice, as you recommend, it could have been a disaster. And you wonder why so many people are now aware of Joe Tippens and what he did? The medical advice he got: go home and die in 3 months (read his story).

@plsticklmyfancy @NewsNation @drpatrick I have to disagree. If you read his whole story, how long he’s been working on this, and what his objectives are, he’s doing it for the right reasons.