Bird in the Wind @wavvvolution

Je veux présenter mes excuses, au nom des Français, pour avoir enfanté la French Theory (qui a enfanté la pire des merdes idéologiques : le wokisme). Nous avons donné au monde Descartes, Pascal, Tocqueville. Et puis, dans les ruines intellectuelles de l'après-68, nous avons donné Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Trois hommes brillants qui ont fabriqué, dans l'élégance de notre langue, l'arme idéologique qui paralyse aujourd'hui l'Occident. Il faut comprendre ce qu'ils ont fait. Foucault a enseigné que la vérité n'existe pas, qu'il n'y a que des rapports de pouvoir déguisés en savoir. Que la science, la raison, la justice, l'institution médicale, l'école, la prison, la sexualité, tout n'est qu'une mise en scène de la domination. Derrida a enseigné que les textes n'ont pas de sens stable, que tout signifiant glisse, que toute lecture est une trahison, que l'auteur est mort et que le lecteur règne. Deleuze a enseigné qu'il fallait préférer le rhizome à l'arbre, le nomade au sédentaire, le désir à la loi, le devenir à l'être, la différence à l'identité. Pris isolément, ce sont des thèses discutables. Combinées, exportées, vulgarisées, elles forment un système. Et ce système est un poison. Car voici ce qui s'est passé. Ces textes, illisibles en France, ont traversé l'Atlantique. Les départements de Yale, de Berkeley, de Columbia les ont absorbés dans les années 80. Ils y ont trouvé un terreau qui n'existait pas chez nous : le puritanisme américain, sa culpabilité raciale, son obsession identitaire. La French Theory s'est mariée à ce substrat, et l'enfant de ce mariage s'appelle le wokisme. Judith Butler lit Foucault et invente le genre performatif. Edward Said lit Foucault et invente le post-colonialisme académique. Kimberlé Crenshaw hérite du cadre et invente l'intersectionnalité. À chaque étape, la matrice est française : il n'y a pas de vérité, il n'y a que du pouvoir, donc toute hiérarchie est suspecte, toute institution est oppressive, toute norme est violence, toute identité est construite donc négociable, toute majorité est coupable. Voilà comment trois philosophes parisiens, qui n'ont probablement jamais imaginé leurs conséquences pratiques, ont fourni le logiciel d'exploitation à une génération entière d'activistes, de bureaucrates universitaires, de DRH, de journalistes, de législateurs. Voilà comment on a obtenu une civilisation qui ne sait plus dire si une femme est une femme, si sa propre histoire mérite d'être défendue, si le mérite existe, si la vérité se distingue de l'opinion. C'est de la merde pour une raison simple, et il faut la dire calmement. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers : la croyance qu'il existe une vérité accessible à la raison, la croyance qu'il existe un bien distinct du mal, la croyance qu'il existe un héritage à transmettre. La French Theory a entrepris de dynamiter les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui les avait nourris. Mais le résultat est là. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Une génération entière sait soupçonner et ne sait plus admirer. Une génération entière voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Je m'excuse parce que nous, Français, avons une responsabilité particulière. C'est notre langue, nos universités, nos éditeurs, notre prestige qui ont donné à ce nihilisme son emballage chic. Sans la légitimité de la Sorbonne et de Vincennes, ces idées n'auraient jamais traversé l'océan. Nous avons exporté le doute comme d'autres exportent des armes. Ce qui se construit maintenant, en silicon valley, dans les labos d'IA, dans les startups, dans les ateliers, dans tous les lieux où des gens fabriquent encore des choses au lieu de les déconstruire, c'est la réponse. Une civilisation se reconstruit par les bâtisseurs, pas par les commentateurs. Par ceux qui croient que la vérité existe et qu'elle vaut qu'on s'y consacre. Par ceux qui assument une hiérarchie du beau, du vrai, du bon, et qui n'ont pas honte de la transmettre. Alors pardon. Et au travail.

🚨Canada gets torched and exposed by FBI Director Kash Patel. Canada has become a major drug trafficking and terrorism hub and most of the terrorists that crossed into the US came via Canada; "Where is all the fentanyl coming from still? Where is all the trafficking coming from still? Where are all the nacro-traffickers going? The northern border (Canada). Our adversaries (Cartels, Islamic terrorists) have partnered up with the CCP and others, Russia, Iran, under variety of criminal enterprises and they going and sailing around to Vancouver and coming around by air. You know who has to gets to stepping? Canada." 85% of the known or suspected terrorists came to the US via Canada last year. Canada can no longer play dumb with Donald Trump and Patel at the helm.

Endless scandals & issues with Carney but let’s forget about that & all worry about Pierre’s security clearance.🙄

In the middle of an election, The Hub received $22,000 thanks to Liberal legislation and is donating it all to charity—will the rest of the news media disclose what they’re getting? - The Hub thehub.ca/2025/03/28/rud…

Canadian media will not repeat this information Pierre said yesterday.

A video released 6 days ago on the World Economic Forum shows Mark Carney discussing world hunger and Canada’s carbon tax hike from $55 to $170/ton in 5 years. He once had $130 trillion in backing—now he’s lost over half due to lawsuits. #MarkCarney #WEF #CarbonTax #FollowTheMoney #EliteAgenda #WorldHunger #FinancialCollapse #Exposed #HiddenAgendas #WakeUpCanada

For all the Canadians out there who've dismissed the incredible investigative journalism conducted by, Sam Cooper (@scoopercooper) at The Bureau, or are too naïve to believe that Canada has massive industrial scale drug manufacturing facilities operating within our borders, perhaps CBC can convince you to sit up and finally take notice. Even Canada's state funded MSM now know that this scandalous issue is just way too big to ignore. These cartel 'Superlab' facilities and international distribution operations are incredibly sophisticated, well funded, and extremely well organized, they are also insanely lucrative. I would be willing to bet that we will soon learn that high-level government officials have ties to these operations, hence why to date, Canada has seemingly been intentionally turning a blind eye and has refused to prosecute top drug kingpins who are known by RCMP investigators to be involved. This story covers one Superlab, how many more are there that have yet to be discovered, and why have @MarkJCarney or @JustinTrudeau never addressed or even so much as spoken about this serious problem? The Bureau: thebureau.news

🚨Groundbreaking Findings on the Giza Pyramid Complex Could Re-Write Human History! This should not be possible.

I will never look at a dandelion the day way again, I hope you enjoy and if you do feel free to share. "The dandelion is the only flower that represents the three celestial bodies of the sun, moon, and stars: The yellow flower resembles the sun, the puff ball resembles the moons, and the dispersing seeds resemble the stars. The dandelion flower opens to greet the morning and closes in the evening to go to sleep. Every part of the dandelion is useful: root, leaves, flower. It can be used for food, medicine, and dye for colouring. Up until the 1800s, people would pull grass out of their lawns to make room for dandelions and other useful “weeds” like chickweed, malva and chamomile. The name dandelion is taken from the French word “dent de lion” meaning lion’s tooth, referring to the coarsely-toothed leaves. 🦁 Dandelions have one of the longest flowering seasons of any plant. Dandelion seeds are often transported away by a gust of wind and they travel like tiny parachutes. Seeds are often carried as many as five miles from their origin! Birds, insects, and butterflies consume nectar or seeds of dandelion. Honey from bees pollinating dandelions is quite delicious. 🐦 🐛 🐜 🦋 🐝. Dandelion flowers do not need to be pollinated to form seeds. Root of dandelion can be used as a substitute for coffee. Dandelion is used in folk medicine to treat infections and liver disorders. Tea made of dandelion act as a diuretic. If you mow dandelions, they’ll grow shorter stalks to spite you. Dandelions are, quite possibly, the most successful plants that exist. They are masters of survival worldwide." 💚🌼💚🌼💚🌼💚🌼💚🌼💚🌼 ~ Author Unknown

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

If you’ve seen any of the footage coming out of Syria today (don’t) you’ll realise what a naive pillock this man is. People dragged from homes, humiliated, tortured and summarily executed. Old men, women and children. An orgy of murderous recreational sadism. Here’s the thing. Journalistically, I don’t actually see a problem with interviewing such people. It’s the job after all, getting insight is important. BUT it’s the sycophantic, faux-Lawrence of Arabia bullshit. Totally blind to the volcano that Syria has become - similar to the volcanos other Arab governments sit on by the way. HE WAS IN IRAQ. HE SHOULD KNOW. All this nation building crap before the army legged it and a vast swathe of the country fell to ISIS. To think, a man who was travelled so extensively in the region could be so hopelessly naive about the reality of what was coming, so easily foreseen. My degree was Arabic, I travelled the region a fair bit. You could see his type coming a mile off. They never said, but it was obvious they were always disappointed that the typical Arab on the street was much more interested in playing FIFA than discussing 12th century Arabic poetry. Edward Said was right about Orientalism btw - a five minute conversation with so many poncy Arabists and you can tell they live in a fantasy land of magic carpets and belly dancers. Western Djinn-brain. The man calibrates everything he does to social proof. Everything. Lied to the country that he supported Brexit and did everything he could to undermine it. Co-presents a podcast with one of the most disgusting and vile men to foul British politics for a generation. His is filth. Filth. There isn’t enough bile to describe this pretentious pretend intellectual. The fact that his wank podcast with a title that doesn’t even make sense is the most popular in the country is a stain on the nation. Maybe I’ll delete this because I try not to be so hateful on twitter, but fucking hell this takes the biscuit. Argh!

Rory Stewart @RoryStewartUK

a year ago

Amazing interview - a real privilege to be back in Syria - stunning turn of events and the most incredible story with so much unknown for the future

1K 276 3K 1.0M 416

__ LEAKED AUDIO (just the audio) OF BLAKE LIVELY & RYAN REYNOLDS AGENT ADMITTING TO FIRING JUSTIN BALDONI TO "RIDE OR DIE" WITH TEAM LIVELY-REYNOLDS Here's the Ari Emanuel audio without my commentary--just the audio. If you want my full video with commentary and explanation, see the youtube video in the comments below. Thanks again to @CJournalist24 for finding the journalist who leaked this to us.

🚨 Blake Lively’s Lawsuit is a Joke Compared to Deadpool 2’s REAL On-Set Dangers In light of Blake Lively suing Justin Baldoni for feeling fat-shamed and experiencing workplace issues on the set of It Ends With Us that made her “uncomfortable,” let’s talk about two women on Deadpool 2 who faced actual unsafe working conditions. First, Joi Harris, the first licensed African American female motorcycle road racer, tragically died while performing a stunt on Deadpool 2. She wasn’t wearing a helmet. The producers were fined nearly $300,000 for violating five safety violations. Fox settled with the stuntwoman’s family. Then there’s the lead actress Morena Baccarin, who described her “traumatizing” experience filming Deadpool 2. She was weighted down 10 feet underwater for a scene that took nearly 14 hours to shoot, leaving her with infected eyes while she was a mom of a 5 month old baby. The scene never even made it into the movie, and she was never shown the footage, unlike Blake, who demanded to see all the dailies. Ryan Reynolds, her husband, who starred in, produced, and co-wrote Deadpool 2, had creative control over the film, yet the set was far more dangerous than anything Blake is claiming in her ridiculous lawsuit against Justin. 🔗 Read Joi’s story here: deadline.com/2020/05/deadpo… 🎥 Watch Morena describing her experience

UNPOPULAR OPINION: They used feminism to get women into the workforce so they could tax both parents and raise your kids themselves.

How did a resigned PM sign a $ 40B contract with multiple clauses that won’t allow future Government’s to break the contracts and how was this done outside of the parliamentary process ! Is this now a dictatorship!!

In a statement to Variety, Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer’s legal team said: “Our clients have been transparent in providing receipts, real time documents and video showing a completely different story than what has been manipulated and cherry picked to the media. Our clients have taken this matter and these issues very seriously notwithstanding the jokes made publicly by the plaintiff and her husband. Her underwhelming amended complaint is filled with unsubstantial hearsay of unnamed persons who are clearly no longer willing to come forward or publicly support her claims. Since documents do not lie and people do, the upcoming depositions of those who initially supported Ms. Lively’s false claims and those who are witnesses to her own behavior will be enlightening. What is truly uncomfortable here is Ms. Lively’s lack of actual evidence.” variety.com/2025/film/news…

This video will change your life ‼️‼️

🚨Blake Lively’s 138 page Amended Lawsuit Against Justin Baldoni Tables Of Contents… A Thread👇 **FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS** **A. Justin Baldoni and Jamey Heath of Wayfarer Engage in Inappropriate and Unwelcome Behavior Toward Ms. Lively and Others on the Set of "It Ends with Us"**

🧵 THREAD: Blake Lively’s latest court docs are HERE, and it’s giving… no smoking gun. Let’s break down what’s actually in these 140 pages and what isn’t. Because feeling “uncomfortable” is NOT illegal. And “sexual harassment” isn’t just bad vibes—it has a legal definition. Let’s go. ⬇️

Ariadna Jacob @littlemissjacob

a year ago

🚨 Blake Lively’s team just filed their response… LATE. Like, down to the wire, maybe even a minute past deadline. Anyway the zip file is on my website where you can download everything. LittleMissJacob dot com

13 24 278 670K 59

🚨 I’ll never understand how Colleen Hoover could openly support Blake Lively while icing out Justin Baldoni. It’s a slap in the face to the fans, the It Ends With Us movie, and the book itself to feature that diabolical scene in the Deadpool 3 movie that Ryan Reynolds and Blake created. Blake’s Ladypool character shoots the Nicepool character mocking Justin Baldoni, right in front of the flower shop that symbolizes the one in the movie, completely destroying the little sage flower shop. If that’s not symbolic of Ryan and Blake’s tyranny in the It Ends With Us movie, I don’t know what is. 🎥 Watch the clips below: the flower shop in the It Ends With Us movie vs. the destruction of the flower shop in the Deadpool 3 movie, the parallels are hard to ignore. On top of it, Justin Baldoni spent years working to bring Colleen’s book to life without compromising the message of domestic violence, avoiding the commercialization Colleen feared. But despite all of that, Colleen sided with Blake and her push for over-commercialization, letting Blake influence the movie in the opposite direction.

OTTAWA – Yesterday was Day 2 of the Federal Court hearing, where Justin Trudeau’s government is trying to convince a judge that shutting down Parliament to avoid Well, folks, here we are. Day two of the Federal Court showdown, where the Trudeau government is desperately trying to convince Canadians that shutting down Parliament to protect their own hide was a completely reasonable thing to do. They want you to believe that this is all perfectly normal, that it’s routine, that it’s just a quirk of the system. Nothing to see here, folks! But the problem with lying is that eventually, you get caught. And on Day 2 of this hearing, Justin Trudeau’s legal team got caught. Over and over again. If you watched what unfolded in court, you saw the Trudeau government’s lawyers flailing like fish on dry land, fumbling through weak excuses as Chief Justice Paul S. Crampton shredded their arguments one by one. At one point, they actually misrepresented a legal precedent in court, only for the Chief Justice to read the case aloud and reveal that it actually contradicted their argument. Humiliating. And that was just the start. This case isn’t just about whether Trudeau technically had the ability to prorogue Parliament. It’s about why he did it—and more importantly, whether Canada is now a country where the Prime Minister can shut down democracy whenever it gets inconvenient for him. Because if the courts let this stand, what’s stopping the next Prime Minister from proroguing indefinitely? What’s stopping the government from suspending Parliament every time there’s a corruption scandal, every time they fear a non-confidence vote, every time they need to cover up a mess of their own making? And that’s exactly what Trudeau did. His government was facing multiple crises all at once—a massive financial scandal, a looming non-confidence vote, and an economic firestorm caused by Trump’s tariff threats. So rather than actually dealing with it, he shut Parliament down. The question is: Did he have the right to do that? Trudeau’s Legal Team Has One Argument: “The Court Can’t Stop Us” The Trudeau government’s lawyers had one job today—convince the court that prorogation is beyond judicial review. That was it. That was their entire strategy. Not that it was necessary. Not that it was ethical. Just that there’s nothing the court can do about it. They started by arguing that Justin Trudeau isn’t responsible for prorogation at all. No, they said, it was actually the Governor General who did it. That’s right—the Trudeau government is now claiming that the Prime Minister of Canada, the man who publicly announced on January 6 that he had decided to prorogue Parliament, wasn’t actually responsible for proroguing Parliament. Naturally, Chief Justice Crampton wasn’t buying it. He pointed out that no Governor General in Canadian history has ever refused a Prime Minister’s request for prorogation. That’s right—never. The Governor General is not some independent actor who just wakes up one morning and decides, You know what? Let’s shut Parliament down for a couple of months. That’s not how this works. The Prime Minister advises it, and the Governor General rubber-stamps it. So why is Trudeau’s government suddenly pretending like he had nothing to do with it? Simple. Because if they can convince the court that this was the Governor General’s decision, then the case gets thrown out. But that’s just the beginning of the absurdity. Trudeau’s legal team then went on to argue that there are no legal limits on prorogation whatsoever. That’s right—none. According to them, the Prime Minister could prorogue Parliament indefinitely, and there’s not a thing the courts or anyone else could do about it. The Chief Justice was visibly skeptical, and for good reason. If prorogation has no limits, then Canada is no longer a parliamentary democracy—it’s an elected dictatorship. At one point, Crampton asked them how Parliament is supposed to hold the government accountable if it’s shut down. The response from Trudeau’s lawyers? Well, Parliament can hold the government accountable when it returns. Yes, you read that right. The government’s actual defense is that Parliament can hold them accountable later. Which, of course, is exactly the point. Because what happens if they just prorogue again? And again? And again? The court kept pressing, but the government had no answer. JCCF @JCCFCanada Lays Out the Real Reason for Prorogation: Trudeau Was Cornered Now, let’s talk about what Trudeau’s government was really trying to avoid. Because while his lawyers were playing legal word games, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms was laying out the cold, hard truth. Trudeau shut down Parliament because his government was about to be exposed on multiple fronts. First, there was the Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) scandal. Millions of dollars had mysteriously gone missing from a government-controlled green technology fund, and the Auditor General had uncovered serious financial mismanagement. Parliamentary committees were demanding answers, and Trudeau’s government was stalling. So what did they do? They shut Parliament down. Then, there was the looming non-confidence vote. Opposition parties had been publicly discussing bringing down Trudeau’s minority government. Conservative MP John Williamson, Chair of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, had even put it in writing. If the vote happened, Trudeau could have lost power. So what did he do? He shut Parliament down. And let’s not forget the economic mess with the United States. Donald Trump had announced plans for 25 percent tariffs on Canadian goods. Trudeau’s government was scrambling to come up with a response, but there was one major problem: any new spending to deal with the crisis would require parliamentary approval. But Parliament wasn’t sitting anymore. Because Trudeau shut it down. The JCCF laid all of this out in court, showing that Trudeau didn’t prorogue Parliament for the good of Canadians—he did it to protect himself. And the Chief Justice seemed to take their arguments seriously. What Happens Next? The Chief Justice has promised to issue a ruling before Parliament resumes on March 24. That means this case will be decided before Trudeau can walk away and pretend none of this ever happened. If the court rules against the government, it will mean that future Prime Ministers cannot abuse prorogation to avoid scrutiny. It will send a clear message that shutting down Parliament to protect yourself is unconstitutional and illegal. But if the government wins, it will mean that the Prime Minister can shut down democracy anytime he wants. It will mean that Canada is no longer a functioning parliamentary system but a country where the executive can do whatever it pleases. And if that happens, ask yourself this: What’s stopping the next Prime Minister from just shutting down Parliament indefinitely? Trudeau might be stepping down soon, but his legacy of corruption, incompetence, and political cowardice will haunt this country for years. The question now is whether the courts will allow him to rewrite the rules of democracy on his way out the door. We’ll find out soon.