I understand the sentiment behind this kinda thing but I find it interesting that the “you” being addressed and the act of “reading theory” is precluded and understood as mutually exclusive from any of the archetypical “oppressed” individuals mentioned as rhetorical props
I understand the sentiment behind this kinda thing but I find it interesting that the “you” being addressed and the act of “reading theory” is precluded and understood as mutually exclusive from any of the archetypical “oppressed” individuals mentioned as rhetorical props
It’s true that experience with the might of capital will equip you more to understand it. It is odd to consider people who experience this 1. Outside of the (amorphous, broad, unnamed) audience you are addressing and 2. Necessarily not reading theory, for some reason?