Obviously much the same for Klay. I said it last week--he's the 1 foundational guy who might be better off elsewhere and the same for the Warriors without him, if his price is anywhere above $25M a year. But there's value in keeping the Big 3 together. It'll likely be up to Klay
Obviously much the same for Klay. I said it last week--he's the 1 foundational guy who might be better off elsewhere and the same for the Warriors without him, if his price is anywhere above $25M a year. But there's value in keeping the Big 3 together. It'll likely be up to Klay
@timkawakami Do you see any teams that want to pay klay 25+ at this point in his career? The teams with cap space don't make a lot of sense but only takes 1 I suppose.
@timkawakami Yo Tim. Couldn’t the core 3 restructure their contracts like Fred Warner and Kittle and free up hella money so we can sign stars?
@timkawakami lol Warriors should be getting rid of Klay, Draymond, Wiggins, and CP3 Blow it all up and rebuilkd
@timkawakami How would they be better without him when they can’t replace the salary slot under the CBA? Can’t think that a veteran minimum contract is better
@timkawakami The value is sentimental. Klay is no longer a foundational guy. He is too limited offensively and defensively, and is at most a 7th/8th man on a good team.
@timkawakami Even 25 is… I don’t know I guess 15 for the player 10 for the player’s legacy is understandable. This all sucks. I don’t want it to be over!
@timkawakami Klay has said he wants to remain a Warrior... he's staying... at 2 years about $24-$25M a year.
@timkawakami Dray and Wiggs took those deals. Klay will too..