TechWins @techwins

A woman put a $29 Apple AirTag in her checked luggage at JFK Airport. The airline lost her bag. The customer service desk said: "We'll locate it and deliver it within 48 hours." She opened Find My on her iPhone. The bag wasn't at the destination airport. It was at a cargo facility in a different state. Moving. Toward a residential address. She showed the airline the live GPS location on her phone. They dispatched recovery. The bag with $3,200 in contents was returned 6 hours later. Without the AirTag: she files a claim, waits 3-8 weeks, and receives $1,500-3,800 in airline liability (the maximum under federal regulation). Probably never sees the bag again. With the AirTag: she tracked it in real time, forced the airline to act, and got everything back. $29. One coin-sized device. The difference between losing $3,200 and losing nothing. Apple has sold hundreds of millions of AirTags. Most owners use them for one thing: finding keys. That's a $29 global tracking network being used like a $5 keychain beeper. Here are 11 AirTag uses and hidden features most owners have never tried 🧵

For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter. AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-Weigh…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

I spent 2 hours of my Saturday reviewing hundreds of charts. These are the setups that stood out and what you should focus on this week. Software is starting to wake up. Semiconductors are taking a breather. The next rotation may already be underway. $MSFT finally broke out. $NBIS is setting up near a key trigger. $PANW $CRWD earnings could be one of the most important software reports of the week. Here’s the watchlist and recording: $SPX: Strong week overall. Thursday breakout above 7517 held. Friday was indecisive. Above 7600 opens continuation. Failure there could mean a pullback toward 7550–7500. $QQQ: Similar setup to SPX. Still leading higher but extended from the 9-day. Above Friday highs keeps momentum intact. $IWM: Still trapped in a range between 287 and 293. Less clear than SPX and QQQ. Watching for either a breakout or rotation into small caps. $BTC: No trade for now. All major moving averages remain stacked bearishly. Needs reclaim of the 200-day around 80k. $SMH: Momentum has slowed. Four straight days of consolidation. Software may be attracting capital away from semis short term. $IGV: One of the most important charts right now. Closed above the 200-day for the first time since January. Holding 100 would be very bullish. $AAPL: Continues to surprise. Every dip gets bought. 310 remains the key level. Below that opens a test of the 9-day around 306. $MSFT: One of the strongest setups on the board. Broke above 433 and 442. Looking for continuation toward the 200-day near 458 and eventually gap-fill toward 480. $NVDA: Ugly close Friday. Failed reclaim of the 9-day. Better opportunities elsewhere for now. Watching 200 below. $GOOGL: Weak close. Could test the earnings gap near 365. Hands off until strength returns above 385. $AMZN: Failed breakout attempt. Still above key moving averages. Above 275 opens ATHs and potentially 300. $TSLA: Building a range. 450–453 is the key breakout area. Above that could trigger a move toward prior highs. $META: Friday was a healthy backtest of the breakout. Above 633 then 645 opens gap-fill potential higher. $AMD: Strong but consolidating. Range here would be healthy after the recent move. $AVGO: Earnings next week. Looking constructive. Above 500 becomes interesting. $SMCI: Strong sympathy move from $DELL earnings. Watching to see if momentum can continue. $QCOM: Failed breakout Friday. Give it time. Watching for renewed strength early in the month. $ARM: One of the strongest semis. Above 356 keeps the trend intact. $INTC: Failed multiple breakout attempts at 125. Consolidation remains constructive. $MU: Strong finish Friday. Holding 960 and reclaiming 980 could open the path toward 1000. $SNDK: Constructive close. Watching 1700 closely. $DELL: Huge earnings move. Now trading inside an earnings range. Break above 430 opens more upside. $NOW: Continues to show strong relative strength. Above 126 could open 150. $IBM: Strong breakout. Watching above 300. $ORCL: Massive momentum shift. Broke the 200-day and exploded higher. One of the stronger enterprise software names right now. $PLTR: Improving. Watching for reclaim and hold above the 200-day. $IREN: Large flag pattern. Above 76–77 could trigger a move toward highs. $ZS: Ugly earnings reaction but trying to recover. $CRWD: Earnings this week. Strong run into the report. $NBIS: One of my favorite setups. Above 233–234 could trigger a significant move. $PANW: Earnings this week. Looking extremely strong. $NET: Recovering sharply after a terrible earnings reaction. Short covering continues. $RDDT: Looking better. Momentum name worth watching. $DDOG: One of the strongest software charts. Earnings gap never filled. Trend remains intact. $FSLR: Solar leadership continues. Above 260 could open 300. $ENPH: Vertical momentum. Watching for continuation. $LITE: Still under pressure. Needs time. $AXTI: Similar to LITE. Momentum has cooled. Overall theme: Software is showing the strongest improvement in relative strength. Semiconductors are consolidating after a huge run. Individual names continue to offer better opportunities than the indices. $MSFT, $NBIS, $PANW, $ORCL, and $NET are some of my favorite charts going into next week.

We've spent a trillion dollars to build a computer that can't do math. Truly a full circle moment for technology.

@

57 years ago

0 0 0 0 0

This is an absolute masterclass from MIT on how to speak

@ChampRDS @grok what’s a natural herbal or supplement based way to achieve something similar, doesn’t have to be as perfect. Zeolites or other chelations?

In 1798, a scientist effectively “weighed” the Earth — without leaving his laboratory. The English scientist Henry Cavendish designed an incredibly sensitive experiment. Inside a quiet wooden shed, he hung a horizontal rod from a very thin wire. Two small lead spheres were attached to the ends of the rod. Nearby, he placed two much larger lead balls. Because of gravity, the large spheres slightly pulled the smaller ones. The force was extremely tiny — so small that the rod twisted by only a minute fraction of a degree. Yet that tiny twist held a big secret. By carefully measuring this small movement, Cavendish determined the strength of the gravitational attraction between objects. From this, scientists could calculate the mass of the entire Earth. His estimate was remarkably close. Cavendish calculated Earth’s mass to be about 6 × 10²⁴ kilograms, while modern measurements give 5.97 × 10²⁴ kilograms. Sometimes the biggest discoveries come from measuring the smallest forces.

Demis Hassabis’s “Einstein test” for defining AGI: Train a model on all human knowledge but cut it off at 1911, then see if it can independently discover general relativity (as Einstein did by 1915); if yes, it’s AGI.

New podcast on AI (full episode). Links below. A Motorcycle for the Mind 0:00 If you want to learn, do 2:13 Vibe coding is the new product management 6:49 Training models is the new coding 10:13 Is traditional software engineering dead? 13:07 There is no demand for average 14:12 The hottest new programming language is English 18:36 AI is adapting to us faster than we are adapting to it 22:56 No entrepreneur is worried about AI taking their job 26:46 The goal is not to have a job 29:49 AIs are not alive 32:55 AI fails the only true test of intelligence 36:49 Early adopters of AI have an enormous edge 39:37 AI meets you exactly where you are 43:02 Always leverage the best intelligence 44:37 If you can't define it, you can't program it 49:37 The solution to AI anxiety is action

Beautiful.

The Curious Tales @thecurioustales

6 months ago

🚨 I just learned about a concept, I can't stop thinking about. The Four Burner Theory. It destroyed Elon Musk's first marriage. It explains why Bezos is jacked but divorced. And why Zuckerberg has no real friends. Once you understand it, your life will never be same:🧵

641 4K 23K 5.9M 39K

Excellent reality check on AI !

Sandeep Manudhane @sandeep_PT

6 months ago

WARNING Massive AI hype being built in a sudden burst (and most of it fake) 1) A scary article: I was surprised to read a long article on Twitter (X) claiming it's just 6-12 months before a Covid-like event changes this world. It claims this will be the AI-event, where most

202 570 2K 570K 3K

@heygurisingh @grok hype or real please summarize if real otherwise roast the idiotic post

Im going to repost again for the people in the back not paying an ounce of attention what is going on in the market. Nick explains this very well. And no, this one isn’t a meme.

Nick O’Neill @chooserich

6 months ago

CRYPTO COLLAPSE CONTINUES AS THE GREAT UNWIND CRASHES MARKETS

553 1K 10K 2.5M 3K

Tesla on Indian roads 😸 #Tesla #ElonMusk

It just seems implausible this is what we are made of, essentially, nanotechnology about a billion years beyond anything we can design or make ourselves.

Incredible. This is the DNA Repair System. Look how many parts work together to make the system function. Without DNA Repair, mutations in DNA would completely destroy its functionality very quickly - it would degrade rapidly into non-functional junk. Which means, the DNA Repair System would have to have been around since the very beginning of Life; DNA and the Repair Systems would have to arise together, at the same time, or DNA could not survive - and neither could Life. But how complex is the DNA Repair System? It requires 6-7 major systems, working in coordination together. Combined, those systems contain a total of about 130-200+ total unique proteins that make up the systems to do the job. Two things make this system most likely designed: 1. DNA cannot survive without DNA Repair. The entire system must be in place at the very start of Life, or Life never starts. But creating the systems requires the information in DNA - they both must arise together, simultaneously. 2. The specified, irreducible complexity of the system. DNA Repair requires a minimal amount of specifically engineered protein systems to function. Just look at how many separate systems are involved in that process! How can anyone see something like this and believe it arose by an accident of natural processes? Life is so clearly intelligently Created.

@grok @FarvingCo @grok are the claims even if anecdotal correct ?

I finally read this because I saw about 40 billion posts claiming it was one of the most insightful things ever written, and it turns out that it’s exactly what I assumed, which is a collection of basic self-help cliches

DAN KOE @thedankoe

7 months ago

x.com/i/article/2010…

9K 50K 321K 206.6M 833K