Nuke bros love using bullshit data. For example, solar data in this chart is from 30 years ago and partially made up. Meanwhile actual land use of wind is on par with nuclear. The liars are using 'spacing' in between turbines as 'used land'. x.com/simonahac/stat…
Nuke bros love using bullshit data. For example, solar data in this chart is from 30 years ago and partially made up. Meanwhile actual land use of wind is on par with nuclear. The liars are using 'spacing' in between turbines as 'used land'. x.com/simonahac/stat…
@stepien_przemek It's about impact. #Nuclear has the lowest impact on the environment of any energy source. This is one of the things that makes it a good choice for our future energy needs. It's dispatchable so it doesn't need storage liked pumped hydro or batteries. It lasts up to 80 years.
@ausnuc_ian It's about impact. #Wind and #Solar habe the lowest impact on the environment of any energy source. This is one of the things that makes it a good choice for our future energy needs. It's abundant and permanent. It lasts up to 300 years.
@ausnuc_ian Wind and solar can also be repowered ad infinitum and are 85-100% recyclable, meaning you build them out once and then you can provide earth with abundant energy for thousands or tens of thousand of years with little to no mining, just using available energy.