Publisher 'unlawfully obtained private information on Prince Harry from age nine' standard.co.uk/news/uk/news-g…
@standardnews What’s the connection between Meghan and Andrew? What’s the embargoed story?!
@standardnews Ahh. Now all of these someone breached Princess Kitty’s record stories are making sense.
@standardnews woah, that's some evil shit!!
@standardnews Right. So it’s the medias fault that his mother shushed him or told hihim to be quiet or got annoyed with him on camera and the media damaged him?
@standardnews What about William. If private information about Harry was unlawfully obtained Williams would have been aswell. After all he is the future king. That would have been more sensational and better for the press thst the spare
@standardnews Because his father probably was the one who fed him to the wolves. Glad he left the UK and is now truly safe.
@standardnews So his lawyers stated in his visa hearing Harry embellished his book to make it more interesting and sell more copies. Who are we to believe. Harry said it’s his truth, his lawyer stated he embellished his life. Can’t have it both ways.
@standardnews Can you explain how… Did a 9 year old have his own landline. With the Rf security high & Harry being a monster of a child I doubt it very much…
@standardnews His barristers ‘claim’ this, it’s not actually factual information & will have to be proved in court. He didn’t have much success the last few times he tried suing them. There was more interest in William, who was/is going to be King.