Kevin Smith @smith74799

@RealTheoWold Again… “immigration status unknown”= illegal

@bluelivesmtr 9 Caucasian guys ……again?

Prop 1 (aka the "Reproductive Freedom and Privacy Act") is a ballot measure Idaho votes on this November.... Pass it and "reproductive freedom" becomes state law, legalizing abortion (most people know that). But there's a second Easter egg hidden in it that almost nobody is talking about. And it ought to worry anyone who believes children deserve protection from mutilation. Because Democrats wrote this initiative to open the door to transing kids. They buried broad "reproductive healthcare" and "privacy" language that could shield puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries from future bans. This is a Democrat-backed Trojan horse and anyone who wants to protect children should see this initiative for exactly what it is. In 2023 we passed the “Vulnerable Child Protection Act,” stopping Democrats from pushing puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and trans surgeries on Idaho kids. But pull up the upcoming initiative and it never names that law. Not once. But since every syllable got lawyered before it ever touched a clipboard, what's missing is missing on purpose. Here’s how it works: if passed, the initiative grants a right to "reproductive health care that directly impact the person's own body," then lists a bunch of pregnancy/abortion-related stuff. But five little words sit in front of that list: "including but not limited to." For a lawyer, that's an open door. So now let’s imagine a liberal judge's argument here. Hormones and surgeries? Those are “healthcare.” Impact a person's own body? About as directly as “medicine” gets. That leaves one word doing the lifting: "reproductive." And since these trans surgeries can leave a child permanently sterile, tell me what's more tied to reproduction than a treatment that ends the ability to reproduce. Some lefty lawyer will make that argument, a woke judge will nod along, and Idaho kids will lose big. One more phrase sits at the front: "Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary." Translation? Whatever a court says this right covers beats every statute already on the books (e.g. our child protection law). So it's whatever a black robe says it is, until a higher court reverses it, or you go back to the ballot and fight the whole thing over again. Vote no in November and the child protection law stays put. Easy. Replacing a leftist judge, though? That could take a decade. Think I’m paranoid? Look at Ohio. They had similar open-ended language in their 2023 amendment. Their ban on these procedures for minors got gutted by an appeals court. But the court didn't even need the new 2023 amendment because it reached back to older "health care freedom" language that was already there and did the job. And if this initiative passes here, Idaho's handing a court sharper tools than Ohio did. A nation judged by how it guards its children. This initiative fails them at both ends because abortion and transing kids would both be back on the menu in Idaho. The people running this template state to state cash in. Kitchen tables don't write "notwithstanding any other provision of law." Lawyers on retainer do. If this was only about abortion, the drafters could say so in one sentence (it’d cost them nothing). So ask, out loud, why that one sentence isn't in there. Because I think this was never just about abortion. It brings abortion back, yes, but it also cracks the door for a judge to sterilize and transition kids behind their parents' backs. And a decent person says no to both, loudly, in November.

@StrongLi2022 All criminals are black and Hispanic until proved otherwise. That works?

@RealJamesWoods @FinalTelegraph Finally someone besides me recommends this guy. He’s been awesome for a long time….without the corresponding follows.

@RogueLou18 And put any found on benefits and found with bank accounts on the “never to enter the US list” and self deportations will increase even more.

@RogueLou18 Cut all and any benefits, de-bank and ban remittances for all who can’t prove citizenship and the self deportations will surge.

@SpoonForIdaho Someone told them Idaho shoots pedos.

@LauraLoomer Trump should tell Xi, every time we determine you’re hacking our computer systems I’m deporting 100K students…Every time you infringe on Taiwan’s or other Asian island nation’s territory another 100K …

@ManPower1776 I think it’s the new “Firing Squad for Pedos” law that might have them on edge.

@RealTheoWold Immigration status unknown = illegal

@Texas__Rose A little late

@cathypat2002 @RogueLou18 This 👆🏿

@BasedMikeLee Tard Fest !

@flexnvy26 @BuzzPatterson You prattle on while ignoring the large populations of Christians who no longer exist in Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, etc. — they didn’t “just move”. Take the log out of your eye before worrying about the speck in Israel’s.

@BuzzPatterson Anyone believe Ro Khanna can identify a M-4? More BS, he wanted a Palestinian escort tour so he got a “unfiltered” view of situation. Really? He a terrorist supporting idiot.

@TuckerCarlson Ro Khanna knows different models of M-4s by just seeing them? Some people might say BS. 🤡 show.

@RightScopee 👍🏿

@Texas__Rose Like Bay City Rollers next and then Zep