Satguy 141 @satguy01

@TrumpsHurricane Today it's called welfare

Supreme Court strikes down blue state's 'vampire rule' in major win for gun rights foxnews.com/politics/supre…

SUPREME COURT BREAKING NEWS The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling today, decisively striking down a contentious regulation in a blue state that critics had long dubbed the "vampire rule." This judicial decision marks a significant victory for proponents of Second Amendment rights and fundamentally reshapes the landscape of state-level firearm restrictions. The regulation, which effectively prohibited the possession of certain types of firearms and accessories after dark, was challenged by advocacy groups who argued that the policy imposed an unconstitutional burden on law-abiding citizens. In a majority opinion that echoed sentiments regarding the preservation of individual liberty, the Court concluded that such a restriction failed to meet the rigorous constitutional standards established in recent jurisprudence. The justices maintained that state-imposed limitations cannot serve as a pretext for infringing upon the core right of self-defense, regardless of the time of day. Legal observers noted that the ruling serves as a stern warning to other states currently maintaining similar, restrictive legislative frameworks. By dismantling the "vampire rule," the Supreme Court has signaled that state efforts to incrementally restrict gun access through unconventional administrative burdens will face intense scrutiny. For gun rights advocates, the decision is seen as a pivotal affirmation that constitutional protections remain consistent and enforceable, irrespective of local political climates or specific state legislative agendas. The fallout of this ruling is expected to trigger a cascade of legal challenges across several jurisdictions, potentially leading to the rapid repeal of analogous mandates nationwide.

Which way was the temperature supposed to go? After all, we were coming out of a little ice age.

6/25/2026 all temperatures in fahrenheit. City Temperature Data. High: 94° Low: 64° Humidity high - low 77% - 25% Last year. High: 86° Low: 53° 73% - 17% Personal CO2 monitor. Calibrated 6/25/2026, 400 ppm at 4,450 ft Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station 🥶 2026 -62°, wind chill -104° Peter Clack @PeterDClack It shouldn't matter if temperatures in Timbuktu or Cincinnati go up by a modest degree over 250 years. And it really doesn't. World temperatures have varied by just 1.4C since the start of the Industrial Revolution in 1769—when the world population was around a billion. That was an era when most people lived in thatched huts in remote rural villages. It was also the tail end of the 600-year Little Ice Age, the coldest period Europe had seen in 10,000 years. Because most of that single-degree rise has already happened, it becomes largely meaningless for humans, who have proven they can thrive in almost any condition. The real argument is how, and why, a political class claims it can divine the future using climate-based prophecies. The IPCC has already ditched its extreme 5-degree warming scenario for 2050. Yet the concept of a 'global' climate had little real meaning before the rise of planetary alarmism. Climate was always essentially regional—a mosaic of localism, uniqueness and geographic difference. It was a practical tool used by seafarers and navigators to capture the conditions of the distinctive new worlds they discovered. Historically, climate only referred to conditions measured over thirty years, perhaps far longer. The very idea of 'climate change' was virtually unheard of before the twentieth century. The modern concept is a direct offshoot from global warming hysteria, turbocharged by Al Gore's astonishingly misleading portrayal of a world shaping up for extinction. In the modern era, chiefly since we were told the world faced a 'global climate crisis', climate has become the ultimate metaphor for human neglect and exploitation. Yet this framework is entirely new. Few people used to believe anyone could predict climate decades into the future; meteorologists routinely struggle with a three-day forecast. Yet this predictive illusion now underpins a 40-year campaign that is dismantling the economies of Western nations. So far, this effort has cost the world an estimated $147 trillion (McKinsey Global, 2022). By the Net Zero deadline of 2050, this bill will hit $275 trillion—or roughly three times today's global GDP. We have traded a practical, regional understanding of our environment for a globalised infrastructure of fear—and we are dismantling Western civilisation to pay for a future no one can actually see.

@PeterDClack Which way was the temperature supposed to go? After all, we were coming out of a little ice age.

Officials: 3 Wendy’s employees charged after spitting, tampering with customer’s food in Union foxcarolina.com/2026/06/23/off…

Three Wendy's Employees in South Carolina Caught Serving Food from the Trash After Spitting in It Shocking video and reports out of Union, SC: Three employees at a Wendy's on North Duncan Bypass have been charged with food tampering after pulling a customer's discarded drive-thru order from the trash, spitting in it, rewrapping it, and serving it back as a "new" meal. The victim complained about her original order on May 30. Staff allegedly trashed it, then tampered with the food. She later received a tip-off call from someone inside the store warning her not to eat it. The general manager investigated, confirmed the tampering, and contacted police.Charged with felony food tampering: • Trinity Lashell Rice, 19 • Aaliyah Shuntai Sanders, 23 • Crystal Shadela Holley, 33 All three were fired. Wendy's called it an isolated incident and said they cooperated fully with authorities. No reported illnesses so far, but this is a disgusting breach of basic food safety and trust. Fast food workers: do better. Customers deserve better. Stories like this make you think twice before hitting the drive-thru.

@nypost Mandatory felony one year in prison, no good time credit and 250 hours community service to the national Park service.

@OliLondonTV @LeighCl68689106 Ugly

@nypost On its face that's not acceptable, but I didn't watch the trial.

@TaraBull Five games suspension is appropriate not one

@TaraBull Tectonic plates are moving.

@AntiWokeMemes And their country they would be sentenced to death

The United States Supreme Court ruled today that foreign nationals remaining on the Mexican side of the border cannot be considered to have arrived in the United States and therefore do not have the right to apply for asylum under current federal law. In a 6-3 decision, the Court reversed a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, concluding that statutory language regarding arrival in the country requires physical presence within U.S. borders. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito asserted that individuals who have not crossed the border cannot be processed for asylum because they have not met the legal threshold of arriving in the country. The Court compared the situation to a guest knocking on a front door, noting that one has not arrived in a house until they have physically entered it. The decision clears the way for the executive branch to resume the practice of metering, which allows Customs and Border Protection to turn back asylum seekers at ports of entry before they set foot on American soil. While the specific policy had been rescinded in 2021, the ruling establishes a legal framework affirming that immigration officers are not obligated to inspect or process asylum claims from individuals who remain outside of U.S. territory.

@TrumpsHurricane Until they talk

@BLKThugreport How long of a suspension should she get?

@GrowingUpRetro @4thOfJuly365 It was a great phone and the battery lasted forever compared to today.

@PapiTrumpo She's mentally ill, like the left.

@its_The_Dr And criminally charged with assault.

@its_The_Dr This stuff's getting out of hand. The person that did this needs to be expelled.