luda @probablyluda

x.com/i/spaces/1DxLd…

@John_Inubook @grok @DogeAccept @elonmusk @dogecoin @dogecoinFdn @houseofdoge @dogecoon @michilumin @DogeCoun At least get the quote right. I never said wrongdoing.

I had some inkling that that the deal was based on trademark licensing. The legitimacy of that trademark is flimsy at best. But if Tim was able to convince some high rolling fraudster that the trademark is worth $200,000/mo, that has nothing to do with me or my goals. Unethical moral hazard? I would agree Predatory strategy? Your could.make that argument. Illegal? Not so sure.

Dear @John_Inubook 413,000 posts ÷ 1,841 days ≈ 224.3 posts/day I highly recommend touching grass, brother. For your own mental health. Your friend, luda

@John_Inubook @OneGoodShibe @DeFrancesco_A @REDWRITER @DogecoinFdn @houseofdoge I did not praise the Fdn dude. This is what I mean by bad faith. Having respect for someone does not mean I approve of their actions. It's called nuance.

@DogeAccept @John_Inubook @OneGoodShibe @DeFrancesco_A @REDWRITER @DogecoinFdn @houseofdoge Have I ever supported, promoted, or endorsed the Fdn? No. Have I consistently and publicly denounced their authority? Yes. What is the issue here?

Pulled from a statement in which I am publicly rejecting and criticizing a project pushed by the Fdn. You are so eager to categorize me as a Fdn shill that you ignore my entire history of rejecting Fdn authority. Respect is not equivalent to endorsement or approval. In a conflict, respecting your enemy and recognizing their strengths can save your life. I have never (not even once) voiced anything even close to allegiance to or approval of the Fdn. My standards are very clear. Fraud is a crime. Accusing someone of a crime is serious. Without actionable evidence, your accusations spill over into baseless defamation of character. Even without any actionable evidence presented, you still find justification in spreading that criminality outwards to innocent people. Anyway... here you are simply making more personal attacks at my character rather than the arguments themselves. You just can't help yourself, can you?

Anyone who does not support or participate in my witch hunt is clearly a witch and should be burnt at the stake.

@John_Inubook @OneGoodShibe @DeFrancesco_A @REDWRITER @DogecoinFdn @houseofdoge Asking for proof of a crime is not support or approval of Fdn or HoD. More bad faith garbage.

What you have shown is not actionable. If you have actionable evidence, why not share it with the class? Regardless of what you actually have, to attribute criminal offense to anyone remotely associated with the activity is fundamentally dishonest and wrong. I am NOT a lawyer, so I refrain from spending all day on X accusing builders in the community of crimes. You, on the other hand, are using very bad faith tactics to try and smear peoples reputations based on nothing but assumptions and associations. Just a load of ass 🍑. You can't even refute my statements without trying to defame me. Get real.

@John_Inubook @OneGoodShibe @DeFrancesco_A @REDWRITER @DogecoinFdn @houseofdoge Intellectual dishonesty would be declaring and accusing someone of participating in fraud with no actionable evidence. What you have is not actionable evidence.

@John_Inubook @OneGoodShibe @DeFrancesco_A @REDWRITER @DogecoinFdn @houseofdoge

Notice how it's always "just asking questions" and never "just looking for answers."

DUGS APP: NEW FEATURES, YOU DECIDE We just wrapped Episode 2 of The DuG Out and got tons of great ideas for new features for the platform from Shibes running their own DuGs, like @SusDogX. Now it’s your turn. Vote with engagement: the post in this thread with the most likes, comments, and reposts in the next 24 hours will have its feature built into DuGs.App.

The DuG Out: Episode 002🎙️ New features and squashed bugs, join us for episode 2 of "The DuG Out" this Wednesday, May 27th @ 8:00 pm ET. Share ideas for new features you want to see on DuGs in the comments below👇 Turn on your notifications in the 𝕏 Space link below so you don't miss out!

Groth16 is a popular zero-knowledge proof system used by chains like zcash, solana, and tornado cash It lets you prove you know a secret without revealing it. Imagine proving you solved a puzzle without showing how you solved it. It creates tiny fast proofs perfect for blockchains and privacy apps. The catch is it needs a trusted setup first. This generates special keys for proving and verifying. A single person doing the setup is risky because they create secret numbers called toxic waste. If they keep them they could fake proofs later. That's why multi-user setups using multi-party computation (MPC) are the best way. Many people join a ceremony one by one. Each adds their own random data on top of the last. Phase 1 creates reusable parameters. Phase 2 tailors them to your specific circuit. The full secret becomes a mix of everyone's contributions. As long as one honest person deletes their part properly the whole setup stays secure. No single person can break it. Big projects like Zcash run these with thousands of participants sometimes over 100000 to spread trust widely. A final public random beacon adds extra protection. This turns a weak single-trust model into something much stronger where you only need to believe not everyone is colluding. Multi-user ceremonies are now the standard for serious Groth16 use. They balance the power of the tech with real security needs. If you're exploring ZK this is a key concept to understand. youtu.be/4eeXn66BIt8?si…

@iMmr_D Not particularly, no. Do you trust math?

@OneGoodShibe @MoonlitMonkey69 Not on purpose. Just a lot coming through the notifications right now.

To be clear: DogeOS DOGE is NOT Layer 1 Dogecoin. You cannot send DogeOS "DOGE" to your L1 wallet It is an EVM compatible, 1:1 custodial backed* token, designed to represent Dogecoin on EVM compatible blockchains. *(Full trustless can be implemented, but requires a soft fork update to L1) L1 is, and always will be, the ultimate form of self-custodial transactional sovereignty. It cannot be restricted, hijacked, siphoned or taxed. It is technically impossible to "move" L1 Dogecoin off of the network. It must always exist in an L1 wallet, somewhere on-chain. In that L1 state, it is limited to basic wallet functionality and simple Send/Receive transactions. No user protections, no recovery, no trustless custodial contracts, no intermediary between users. On L1, it is legally sticky to serve as a financial mediator between parties. Without custodial ownership of funds, a system cannot perform automated transactions on behalf of users on L1. L1 is, and always will be, the ultimate form of self-custodial transactional sovereignty. It cannot be restricted, hijacked, siphoned or taxed. DogeOS is offering a compromise: Sacrifice some self sovereignty and trust their system to facilitate EVM functionality for Dogecoin using their 1:1 backed "equivalent" token. --- EVM functionality unlocks: Turing-complete smart contracts: Complex, conditional, self-executing code. Custom tokens: ERC-20/ERC-721 fungible & NFT standards. dApps & composability: Full DeFi, games, DAOs with interoperable contracts. Automated trustless execution: On-chain escrows, liquidations, royalties, etc. --- For many L1 purists, none of this functionality is worth sacrificing their own self-sovereignty for. This is not a "bad" or "wrong" position. It is the most pure Dogecoin stance you can take. However, any meaningful growth for Dogecoin as a practical currency and ecosystem requires more than pure L1 sovereignty. For users, developers, and builders who want Dogecoin to compete in the modern blockchain world, DogeOS provides a necessary and pragmatic bridge. - You voluntarily deposit your L1 Dogecoin into the custodial bridge. - You receive an equivalent amount of DogeOS DOGE on the EVM-compatible layer. - You gain full access to smart contracts, ERC standards, dApps, and automated on-chain logic. - When desired, you can redeem your DogeOS DOGE back to native L1 Dogecoin. This is not a replacement for L1 Dogecoin. It is an opt-in extension layer designed to bring utility and capital efficiency to the Dogecoin community without compromising the integrity of the base layer. L1 remains the ultimate settlement and sovereignty layer. DogeOS becomes the execution and innovation layer. Both can (and should) coexist. The future of Dogecoin does not require choosing one over the other. It requires recognizing that maximum sovereignty and maximum utility are different priorities, and the ecosystem is big enough for both. Purists protect the soul of Dogecoin on L1. Builders expand its reach on DogeOS. Together, they make Dogecoin stronger.