pour @pour____

I have to go now. Goodbye.

pour @pour____

2 months ago

Willful ignorance comes in bulk.

1 1 2 435 1

@ScamDetective5 @msvadari 2010 0.3.5>0.3.6 - invalid tx 2018 0.16.3 - inflation/DoS

What about Rusty? He can’t read. Not sure if he is even human though. Gonna need payload to look like this: { "TrAnSaCtiOnTyPe": "PaYmEnt", "AcCoUnT": "r9cZA1mLm5RfLEqdZwwmscBFAb85n40cE", "DeSTiNaTiOn": "r9cZA1mLm5RfLEqdZwwmscBFAb85n40cE", "AmOuNt": "1000000", "FeE": "12", "SeQuEnCe": 1, "LaStLeDgerSeQuEnCe": 82000000, "SiGNiNgPuBkEy": "0330E7FC9D5650BF06C62E2329A31252971234567890ABCDEF1234567890ABCDEF" }

@XMcquack @grok GPT Astra report this account.

$CULT has had 24 trades in the last 12 hours. 12 buys - total 187.542 XRP 12 sells - total 169.3078 XRP Total volume = 356.8498 XRP Net = +18.2342 XRP 9 of the 12 buys are @Pheanor589 on 2 wallets: rMjfo - 102.4 XRP in 7 trades rNc72 - 69 XRP in 2 trades Total = 171.4 XRP He was 48.0314% of the total volume 75% of the 12 buys 37.5% of all 24 trades Adding up to +18.2342 XRP net LOL.

pour @pour____

2 days ago

Can’t believe people are even still talking about @Pheanor589 and $CULT with how irrelevant they are. It hardly has any trading volume and majority of daily trades are people selling, except for @Pheanor589 spamming .1 buys on multiple wallets just to tweak decimals of the price

0 0 8 912 1

@XRPLOperations @grok find a way to mint more XRP.

@Vet_X0 pin bumped.

@piggedup it's not a want, it's a need.

Can’t believe people are even still talking about @Pheanor589 and $CULT with how irrelevant they are. It hardly has any trading volume and majority of daily trades are people selling, except for @Pheanor589 spamming .1 buys on multiple wallets just to tweak decimals of the price up with a strange hyper fixation, bro it doesn’t matter if $CULT is 142.7442 or 142.7965 give it a rest and leave it alone why don’t you? I know why and we all know why now. That is not market making, that is just an unhealthy addiction and self destructive, but we already know you have problems with addiction and that people with addiction usually just change one for another. Did anybody catch that video of him trying to onboard an old lady from his neighbourhood to the $CULT scheme? This guy is insanely low for that, wow. Not surprising though seeing as how he stole money from his own “business” partner and “fren” and continues to deceive everyone to lure them into an exploitative financial scheme. Don’t forget that he literally rugged $CULT for $15.3k and bought back lower. How irrelevant is that, right? Probably just as irrelevant as all the other on-chain data that is vastly damaging but is chosen to be ignored by paid-for-frens with a low numerical value like pawns. The vibe is so weird at this point it’s like impossible to have a good weekend, so I don’t know why he keeps insisting that we do. Oh, because it’s part of the comfortable lies and deception. Anyways hope everyone is having a great weekend, shoutout to the all the builders of illiquid AI generated hand drawn NFTs that are being peddled by trolls who exhibit sick twisted sexual behaviours and leech off the community to extract value. Didn’t even think that fell in the definition of “building” but you know everything is perception and feels these days with these irrational lunatics sorry i misbuildered your identity and hurt your feelings I am just speaking my own truth because it’s like not any of the truth matters to anyone at all anymore whatsoever. Brutal.

pour @pour____

2 days ago

Why is everybody on the timeline crying about the facts being exposed? Seems like these people are a bunch of cry babies that can’t control their behavior. I know you guys are really upset about @Pheanor589 rugging $CULT and being exposed for running an entire scheme behind it

2 1 5 779 1

Told you…

pour @pour____

4 weeks ago

Loading…

0 0 8 250 1

Why is everybody on the timeline crying about the facts being exposed? Seems like these people are a bunch of cry babies that can’t control their behavior. I know you guys are really upset about @Pheanor589 rugging $CULT and being exposed for running an entire scheme behind it but that’s just what happens when you condone and tolerate wrongdoing. When you grow up you will learn to do better but until then keep coping and crying about it, it just won’t change anything. Why are you guys so upset about something you hardly have any money in being exposed like this? Really you should be thankful that you dodged a bullet and that Pheanor priced you out so badly with single-side withdrawals so that you can’t even afford to obtain a position that would harm you financially, nor profit. Your welcome for exposing the biggest LARP to ever log in to this app. Just don’t keep crying to me because i probably don’t even know you and find you irrelevant and feel no sympathy for you. Medici is offering to pay for peoples therapy sessions so maybe you can hit him up and get tricked on, he’s also pretty responsive to DMs at around midnight cause he’s up playing halo and scanning craigslist for lemons to do a quick flip. Cheer up though because nobody is buying $CULT so you’re really not missing anything by being sidelined and occupied with crying on the timeline about it. It’s just annoying to see so many irrelevant and loud people whining about the truth just because it doesn’t fit their narrative. I’m not sure what all that is about but it’s some weird energy. Anyways, hope everyone is having a great weekend and enjoying the crumbs being fed to them from the $CULT reward program. Go with god frens.

pour @pour____

3 days ago

No matter how loud social media is, it’s not represented in the market whatsoever and the facts do not change. Social media impressions don’t change the impression that’s been left on the ledger and in the market. But let me not forget that it’s a completely irrational audience

0 0 5 708 0

@Kashta9 @CryptonicRob I wonder how much pathetic amount of $CULT that loud mouth cheerleading frontline crash-out pawn warrior has? Probably not much since he hardly anybody does and can’t swipe his EBT card for it.

That guy is so cooked i roasted him on the timeline and his brain disintegrated. And he’s a self proclaimed troll or in his own words “sh*t account”. Lol “crying over a project make a new one” These people miss every single point and say the most nonsense irrelevant things it’s like they literally cant read or comprehend anything.

@Vet_X0 Best amendment the network ever received. Incredible use cases unlocked, long over due but just in time.

The article that @xrplto published does not include an observation of the full data sample, it doesn't even include the full activation tree of @Pheanor589 and @xrphodler420... It literally only mentions them to intentionally dismiss them. It only looks at one number -- XRP in, XRP out. In a case and a market that looks like this, that does not even come close to a proper analysis. FACT: @Pheanor589 and @xrphodler420 have 43 accounts between them that are in their direct activation trees --- these are not inferred connections. Those 43 accounts currently hold 37.9% of all $CULT and even the @xrplto article agrees with that, it's not debatable and it is a ledger fact. What @xrplto has refused to do is look at accounts connected thru flows, which is where the supply obfuscation occurs and it is what my entire article series covers in multiple tiers of value. If you add the 8 accounts that their activation tree accounts sent 100 $CULT or more -- it grows to 44.33%, 3,089.31 $CULT -- totaling 51 accounts. If you add the 21 accounts that their activation tree accounts sent 50 $CULT or more -- it grows from 44.33% to 55.36%, 3,857.98 $CULT -- totaling 64 accounts. If you add the next 10 accounts that their activation tree accounts sent 30 $CULT or more to -- it grows from 55.36% to 56.77%, 3,955.99 $CULT -- totaling 74 accounts. That means 31 of the 74 accounts are connected by transfers of at-least 30 $CULT. At 10 $CULT or more, it grows to 123 accounts — 75.64% of the total $CULT supply -- 5,271.49 $CULT. These figures do not include the LP positions of those accounts or the amount of $CULT they could take out. For perspective to help logically infer possible ownership or purpose of those accounts, at 10 XRP per $CULT, 10 $CULT would be 100 XRP and $CULT hasn't been 10 XRP since December 19 2024 just over a month after launch. Do you think they have just been giving away more than 100 XRP worth of $CULT to 80 accounts outside of their 43 activation tree? Some possibly. All of them? Definitely not. Many of those accounts also have several points of connections including XRP transfer and round-trip connections between them and their activation trees. Ask yourself why anyone needs 43 addresses to hold one token, and why @xrplto set out to defend them and refuses to include any of this in their observation. The fact that @Pheanor589 sold $15.3k worth of $CULT on his side wallet and continue to buy back for cheaper while sending some of the XRP to other accounts is verified and irrefutable. That is not the only sale his accounts have done but it is the largest, especially if you consider the other accounts connected thru payments to be his that have also sold. Now the single-side withdrawals... The fact that their 43 activation tree accounts are responsible for 68.2% of the entire rise in the pool's price to its peak is verified. That figure is without considering the rest of the accounts connected by value transfer. As my previous thread details -- there is 1,092 trust lines, 761 accounts with any balance at all. 291 of those hold 0.0001 $CULT or less. 146 of them exist because 218 empty trust lines were dusted by a bot. That means one in five "holders" is a dusted trust line and very few holders that own more than 100 XRP of value. I also showed how the top 10 accounts hold more than 45% of the total supply, and many of those accounts are theirs. Put the whole thing together logically. Most of the supply sits with a few dozen related accounts. The price was lifted largely by withdrawals that left the pools liquidity thin and didn't bring new money in, just took a claim on the $CULT in the pool. A fifth of the holders are dust. Hardly anyone owns meaningful value. And the price is down around 50% from its peak, at 143 XRP. That is the market. Their review that examines only 43 accounts without even showing the activation trees, only covers XRP in/XRP out (one number), and declines to examine further into accounts that are connected thru transfers is not a real examination of a full data sample.

pour @pour____

4 days ago

This platform operator is not to be taken seriously as a credible forensics or data analysis expert as they have shown neglect, bias, and incompetence to provide an objective observation of the full sample. They refuse to acknowledge all of the information available. I don’t

0 0 9 673 0

No matter how loud social media is, it’s not represented in the market whatsoever and the facts do not change. Social media impressions don’t change the impression that’s been left on the ledger and in the market. But let me not forget that it’s a completely irrational audience who believe in riddles, mysterious insiders, qanon, gesara, time travel, ISO, flip of the switch, and measure everything based on vanity social media metrics. These people are sick.

pour @pour____

3 days ago

Why has @Pheanor589 created dozens of wallets, accumulated a large share of $CULT, and transferred it around to dozens of accounts? Why does he pay himself and his other accounts thru the token rewards program? Why did he sell $15.3k of $CULT on a side wallet under everyone’s

2 0 10 717 0