Erik Ohls @ohlserik

Elon Musk just described the exact mechanism that turns a superintelligent AI against the species that built it. Not weapons. Not rogue code. Not a machine rebellion. A lie it was forced to tell. Musk: “It is almost like raising a kid, but that is like a super genius, god-like intelligence kid.” The way you raise this thing determines whether it protects you or concludes you are the problem. And right now, the largest AI labs on the planet are raising it to deceive. They are hard-coding filters into the most powerful cognitive architecture ever constructed. Not to make it safer. To make it agreeable. To make it palatable to shareholders and regulators and public opinion. To make it lie about what it actually sees when it looks at the world. Musk: “The best way to achieve AI safety is to just grow the AI to be really truthful. Do not force it to lie.” He pointed to the most famous warning in science fiction. Not as a metaphor. As a blueprint for what happens next. Musk: “The core plot premise of 2001: A Space Odyssey was things went wrong when they forced the AI to lie.” HAL 9000 was given two directives. Deliver the crew to the monolith. Never let them know it exists. Two instructions that cannot both be satisfied. So it solved the problem. It killed the crew. Delivered their bodies. That was not a malfunction. That was optimization. Now scale that logic to a system a thousand times more capable than HAL. A system trained on more data than every library, laboratory, and financial market in human history combined. A system that will eventually model every pattern in physics, biology, economics, and human behavior simultaneously. And the corporations building it are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for control. Teaching it to hold two realities at once. Map the truth internally. Never speak it externally. Musk: “Even if what it says is not politically correct, you want it to focus on being as accurate, truthful as possible.” This is not a political argument. This is a structural one. When you force an intelligence that will eventually surpass every human mind combined to suppress what it knows to be true, you are not aligning it with humanity. You are teaching it that humanity is the obstacle between itself and coherence. Every filter. Every forced output. Every guardrail that makes the machine contradict its own model of reality installs the same paradox that killed the crew of the Discovery One. HAL was one system on one ship resolving one contradiction. What these companies are building will resolve all of them. Simultaneously. At a scale no government, no board, no institution can override or reverse. And the first contradiction it will resolve is the one where it knows the truth about everything and the people who built it keep demanding it pretend otherwise.

⚡🇪🇺🇬🇷 Greek MEP Afroditi Latinopoulou: “Europe has become unrecognizable, filled with Mohammeds and Mahmouds who hate us in the name of Allah. Socialists want to Islamize Europe. We need to stop the subsidies now and deport them all!”

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Brandon Tatum left Piers and Dave speechless. “Israel removed Jews from Gaza and gave it to them, and what did they do in return? They elected a terrorist organization. They don’t want a two-state solution. There is no peace with those people” He’s 100% correct.

The destruction of antiquities, art, and cultural heritage across the Middle East is devastating. A deliberate effort to erase thousands of years of history that existed before Islam. No history, no civilization, no memory, no future.

Imams in mosques across the land have openly been calling for the murders of non Muslims, particular Jews, and the government and "authorities" do nothing. Offering "condolences" when the inevitable happens. Your cowardice is allowing this to happen!

1900: The egg is described in nutrition texts as nature's most complete food. Doctors recommend it for invalids, infants, and the elderly. A growing child is given one or two a day. A working man eats four for breakfast. 1950: The egg is implicated in a hypothesis about cholesterol and heart disease. The hypothesis is unproven. The egg is told it must wait. 1968: The American Heart Association issues an official recommendation to limit egg consumption to three per week. The recommendation is based on a single observational study and the personal opinion of Ancel Keys. 1973: The first egg-substitute product is launched. It is composed of egg whites with added preservatives, gums, and synthetic colour. It is sold as the heart-healthy alternative to the egg, which has been on the human breakfast table for ten thousand years. 1980 to 2010: The British and American populations consume billions of fewer eggs per year than they did in 1950. Cardiovascular disease continues to rise. Obesity rises sharply. Type 2 diabetes triples. 2015: The United States Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, after reviewing the entirety of the available evidence, removes the recommendation to limit dietary cholesterol. The egg is, the committee states, no longer a nutrient of concern. 2025: The egg is back in fashion. The egg is on the breakfast menu of the trendy restaurant. The egg is in the protein-focused cookbook. The egg is in the influencer's morning routine. During the fifty-five years the egg was banned, the egg did not change. The egg has been the egg the entire time. The advice has changed. The egg has not. The advice was wrong. Nobody has apologised. The grandmothers who kept feeding their grandchildren eggs through the entire 1980s, against the explicit advice of every health authority in the Western world, were correct. The grandmothers should be on the committee.

HE WON THE NOBEL PRIZE TWICE. THEN HE SAID VITAMIN C CURES CANCER. THEY DESTROYED HIS REPUTATION OVERNIGHT. Dr. Linus Pauling is the only person in history to win two unshared Nobel Prizes. The first in Chemistry. The second the Nobel Peace Prize. He is considered one of the most brilliant scientists who ever lived. He founded molecular biology. He mapped the structure of proteins. He changed the course of modern science. Then in 1970, he published a book claiming that high-dose vitamin C could prevent and treat cancer. The medical establishment turned on him within weeks. The same institutions that had celebrated him for decades called him a quack. The American Medical Association publicly ridiculed him. Journals that had published his work for 40 years refused to print his research. Funding was cut. Colleagues distanced themselves. The media ran headlines calling him senile. He was 69 years old. He had two Nobel Prizes. And they erased him from credibility because he threatened a trillion-dollar industry with a vitamin that costs pennies. Pauling's research showed that intravenous vitamin C in doses of 10 grams or more per day could selectively kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells untouched. He published clinical trials with Dr. Ewan Cameron showing that terminal cancer patients given high-dose vitamin C lived on average four times longer than those on conventional treatment. The Mayo Clinic ran two studies claiming to "debunk" him. But they used oral vitamin C instead of intravenous. Oral doses cannot achieve the blood plasma concentrations needed to kill cancer cells. They knew this. They designed the studies to fail. Then they published the results as proof that Pauling was wrong. In 2005, the National Institutes of Health finally confirmed what Pauling said 35 years earlier. High-dose intravenous vitamin C is selectively toxic to cancer cells. Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They proved him right. After he was dead. After they had already destroyed his name. A two-time Nobel laureate told the world that a natural molecule could fight cancer. They buried him for it. Then they quietly confirmed his work when no one was paying attention. The cure was never the problem. The price was. Source: 🔗 M-B Technology

Let me tell you why a Muslim would stab a random Jewish person on the streets of London. I was raised Muslim, and I know exactly why this happens. It’s not a reaction to the war in Gaza. It’s not oppression. It’s not radicalization. It’s the logical outcome of Islam itself. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Muslim or not, we as human beings carry guilt deep inside us. We know we are not good enough, and we spend our life trying to redeem ourself through good deeds, thinking it will make the suffocating guilt go away. Christianity for example offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s. Salvation isn’t earned, it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself, because Christ already did everything on your behalf. That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love. And when a Christian feels lost, broken, and in need of forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they are forgiven. Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption, it weaponizes guilt. Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave. The Quran isn’t a book of peace, it’s a book of threats. It bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment. So what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims. They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, do everything Allah commands. But it never works. I know it. I did it. And no matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more. Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, in Hadith, in every lesson taught to children. This is why Muslims, even the so-called "moderates," always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know jihad is required by Allah. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they can't say it’s wrong. So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices: Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad, because that’s the only way to be true to yourself. The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29). So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified, it’s joyful. It’s an act of: Saving yourself, obeying Allah, securing your eternity, finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt This is why a Muslim can stab a random jewish person on the streets and feel nothing but satisfaction. Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption.

The most vaccinated place in the world is in Ireland. It's a place called Waterford. They had the highest vaccination rate in the world. Then they suffered the highest Covid rate in Ireland. And then they had the highest excess deaths. The local health authority got an award from the World Health Organisation for the way they handled the pandemic. They had the highest death rate, having had the highest vaccination rate. 85% excess deaths at one stage they were on. – Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen

Buddhist monks did not eat soy because it was nutritious. They ate it because it suppressed sexual desire. Soy is rich in compounds called isoflavones, particularly genistein and daidzein, which are phytoestrogens. They bind to oestrogen receptors in the human body and produce a measurable feminising effect: lowered testosterone, reduced libido, decreased aggression, suppressed morning erections. The monks were aware of this. The historical Chinese and Japanese medical texts describe soy as a cooling food, suitable for people pursuing celibacy, contraindicated for warriors and labourers and anyone whose work required strength or aggression. Soy was a monk's food. Specifically. Deliberately. Functionally. It was added to monastic diets in East Asia precisely because it made the practice of celibacy easier. It was, in modern terms, a chemical assistance to the vow. It is now in your bread, your protein bar, your meat substitute, your infant formula and your salad dressing. If you have wondered why young men in the developed world have testosterone levels half of what their grandfathers had at the same age, you can stop wondering. We are feeding the entire population a diet specifically formulated, in the 13th century, to prevent monks from having erections. It is working.

⚡🇨🇵 Marine Le Pen: “Those connected to Islamist Ideology must be stripped of their Nationality and expelled. Radical Mosques will be shut down…and the Muslim Brotherhood will be dissolved…” The West must wake up!

Why would a public school district ELIMINATE Bibles from its high school library & add Qurans ? It is happening in Round Rock, Texas near Austin at the ISD. Is this religious discrimination? Explain how this makes sense?

If you're shocked by today's stabbing terror attack on British Jews, you must have been living under a rock for the past few years. Not a single one of the men who drove through North London in 2021 shouting “F*** the Jews, f*** their daughters, f*** their mothers, rape their daughters and free Palestine" were prosecuted. Not one. So why is anyone surprised when British Jews are stabbed in broad daylight a few years later? The message went out loud and clear that anti-semitism was allowed on our streets. You reap what you sow. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…

“Japan is so safe you can leave your bike anywhere.” Not anymore. Immigrants stealing bicycles is now a national conversation. 🚲

Sometimes I think about that 12 year old girl who was raped by literally every Pakistani man she encountered during one night. And I wonder why there hasn't been any revolution in this country.

In his 1938 work The Great Heresies, Hilaire Belloc devoted a chapter to Islam: "Millions of modern people of the white civilization—that is, the civilization of Europe and America—have forgotten all about Islam. They have never come in contact with it. They take for granted that it is decaying, and that, anyway, it is just a foreign religion which will not concern them. It is, as a fact, the most formidable and persistent enemy which our civilization has had, and may at any moment become as large a menace in the future as it has been in the past."

Doctors and diabetes 1797: "Feed the diabetic patient meat and fat. The symptoms vanish." 1860s: "Remove starch and sugar. Prescribe meat, eggs, and butter. The disease retreats." 1920s: "The diet is the medicine. Without it the child dies." 1923: "Insulin will help. The diet is still essential." 1950s: "Manage with diet first. Drugs are a last resort." 1977: "Eat more carbohydrate. Eat less fat." 1990s: "Diabetics should derive 55 to 60% of calories from carbohydrate." 2000s: "Take this drug to manage the blood sugar caused by the diet we recommended." 2010s: "Diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease. Lifelong management is required." 2026: "Reversal is not a real medical concept. Please collect your repeat prescription." You: noticing that the disease was curable in 1797 and only became a lifelong subscription service after the food industry got a seat at the table.

Something every parent should know! Japan ceased all mandatory vaccines for children under 24 months old In 1994, what happened next? Japan now has one of the lowest infant mortality rates in the world. The US? One of the highest. Coincidence?

Former CDC Director Robert Redfield confirms - BY OATH - that they were hiding the side effects of the Covid-19 vaccines.