I don’t think most “normie” SF voters understand the extreme libertarian, anarcho-capitalist ideological nature of YIMBY. To them, neighborhood input on new real estate development and city planning is literal communism.
I don’t think most “normie” SF voters understand the extreme libertarian, anarcho-capitalist ideological nature of YIMBY. To them, neighborhood input on new real estate development and city planning is literal communism.
Also, somehow, the Muslim rule of Spain in the Middle Ages.
Also, somehow, the Muslim rule of Spain in the Middle Ages.
@noahsloss You are confused. Democracy is for setting and changing the rules, that’s where community input belongs. When it comes to individuals applying for projects, following the democratically established rules, that should be ministerial and not litigated in kangaroo public hearings.
@noahsloss Do you understand what “rule of law” means and “arbitrary or capricious”? If you are familiar with these concepts you can stop equivocating YIMBY advocacy for more housing.
@noahsloss Do you understand what “rule of law” means and “arbitrary or capricious”? If you are familiar with these concepts you can stop equivocating YIMBY advocacy for more housing.
@noahsloss Neighborhood input results in a lot fewer neighbors. The same people who put “Black Lives Matter + Love is Love” signs up then say “NO!” to more/taller housing near them. In doing so, they have effectively “Built The Wall”. San Francisco is now a Texan gated community.
@noahsloss I think most people want some voice around the process. What most people do not want is to enable neighborhood activists & community organizations to have a role in the process. Calle 24, THD, etc shouldn’t have any voice at all in these discussions or ability to affect policy
@noahsloss You have no actual policy proposal solutions for the housing crisis that are even remotely realistic.