I'm real tired of all the "RU says it's fighting NATO, but NATO hasn't even showed up to the battlefield yet, and RU army is suffering huge losses, haha, NATO stronk." You can gleefully talk abt how NATO totally will defeat RU if it decides so. But how you know if you never tried
I'm real tired of all the "RU says it's fighting NATO, but NATO hasn't even showed up to the battlefield yet, and RU army is suffering huge losses, haha, NATO stronk." You can gleefully talk abt how NATO totally will defeat RU if it decides so. But how you know if you never tried
And this approach always downplays Ukrainian efforts and sacrifices.
"If UA manages to resist with our old military equipment, then we are totally fine". No, this is not the line of reasoning you should be going for. It should be, "are we ready to put at least a fraction of Ukraine's efforts into defending our own countries? Are we ready at all?"