Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

The Blockchain for the Quantum Era. linktr.ee/naoris Quantum Safe Future Joined February 2022

Tweets

4K
Followers

246K
Following

381
Likes

6K

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@kevalgala03 Good breakdown. Worth adding: the signature scheme is ML-DSA-87 at NIST Level 5, not a custom or unaudited construction. That distinction matters more than most threads give it credit for.

1 2 10 296 0

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@IBM 01010111 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01010001 01110101 01100001 01101110 01110100 01110101 01101101 00100000 01101110 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100100 01100001 01111001 00111111

0 1 8 838 0

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@vstampede40 We didn't skip it, we built it ourselves 😎

0 0 0 38 0

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

2 days ago

5️⃣ reasons every chain's post-quantum migration is harder than it sounds: 1️⃣ The exposed-key problem. On today's chains, every time you send a transaction, your public key is revealed and recorded on-chain forever. A quantum computer can reverse that public key into your private key, the key that controls the funds. Roughly 6.9 million BTC already sit in addresses like this. Even if a chain upgrades tomorrow, everything already exposed stays exposed. 2️⃣ The coordination problem. Wallets, validators, exchanges and users all have to move, and every user has to act. The workaround, opt-in migration, avoids a hard fork but means the slowest users stay exposed the longest. 3️⃣ The size problem. Post-quantum signatures run roughly 30x larger than the ones securing validator consensus today. Blocks grow, verification slows, and networks need entirely new compression engines just to restore current performance. 4️⃣ The aggregation problem. The mechanism compressing thousands of validator signatures into one has no post-quantum equivalent. It has to be rebuilt from scratch, and the replacements are still in development. 5️⃣ The end-date problem. No chain has set a date for when classical signatures stop being accepted. And nobody has answered the hardest question: what happens to the coins nobody migrates. Revoke them, or leave them as permanent quantum honeypots. Building post-quantum from the start avoids all five. No exposed classical history, no opt-in migration to shepherd, no aggregation engine to rebuild, no end date to negotiate. The hardest part of migrating is not the cryptography. It is everything around it. Naoris doesn't need to migrate. Post-quantum was the starting point, ML-DSA-87 at the protocol level, across transactions and validator communication alike. We're merely at the beginning of a Post-Quantum World.

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a week ago

The Great Quantum Awakening. IYKYK 🫳 🎤

99 34 143 10K 6

91 24 115 7K 3

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@Pobiom23 Never stopping!

0 0 0 39 0

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@cryptomontage02 Security is our core ethos 🧠

0 0 1 46 0

View Details

Naoris Protocol @NaorisProtocol

a day ago

@Weaver_Labs Right, and coordination failures compound. Every wallet or exchange becomes a weak link the whole network inherits. That's why starting post-quantum beats retrofitting it across a live ecosystem.