Sollearn @SollearnG

The crypto industry's biggest threat won't disappear overnight. Unlike every major crisis before it, quantum computing isn't a market cycle. Everyone's focused on price action. No one's talking about the quantum threat. Here's what they're not telling you. Every blockchain you know and love relies on cryptography designed decades ago. The entire system depends on mathematical problems that are practically impossible for today's computers to solve. Quantum computing changes that equation. Traditional cryptography: • Protects trillions of dollars in digital assets • Has secured the internet for decades • Was never designed for the quantum era Think I'm exaggerating? Google recently performed a quantum calculation in around 200 seconds that would take one of today's fastest supercomputers an estimated 10,000 years. Here's what keeps me up at night: No one knows exactly when Q-Day arrives. Upgrading the world's cryptography will take years. Most of the industry still isn't preparing for it. Most founders are focused on token launches, fundraising, and the next narrative. Few understand cryptography. Even fewer are thinking about quantum. But here's the real twist. This isn't just a security problem. It's a future-proofing problem. The next decade will separate two kinds of blockchains: • Those built for the quantum era. • Those trying to catch up. Choose wisely.

@NaorisProtocol did they?

@NaorisProtocol im not a builder but i like naoris thats why i used naoris wallet

Less than 7% of the world has invested in crypto. Less than 0.1% understands the implications of quantum computing for digital systems. Both numbers will change. They will not change at the same pace. Crypto adoption grew because people understood that the financial system had a trust problem. Blockchain offered a programmable, transparent alternative. The narrative was accessible. Quantum adoption is different. The urgency is invisible until it is not. The threat does not announce itself. The cryptography underneath most digital systems simply stops being sound, and most people will not understand why until something breaks. When AI met the world, it reshaped industries in under five years. When quantum computing meets cryptography, the window for preparation is much shorter than most people think. And unlike AI, quantum does not create new capabilities for everyone. It removes the protections everyone already relies on. Crypto changed finance. Quantum will change what finance runs on.

@NaorisProtocol @Cloudflare 👀

The United Kingdom has entered the Quantum conversation. The UK just announced the world's first national quantum standards network. This sits inside a broader £2 billion quantum investment programme, one of the largest national commitments to quantum technology anywhere in the world. Standards might sound like a procedural step. It is not. National standards are how a technology moves from research into deployment. From labs into products. From experiments into critical infrastructure. A national standards network means the UK is treating quantum as infrastructure, not a science project. The programme includes: ✅ Advanced procurement of large-scale quantum computers. ✅ A dedicated programme for quantum networking, with £125m committed. ✅ Quantum sensing, computing, skills and infrastructure funded together as a national system. Countries that build the standards frameworks and the industrial base for quantum will have a structural advantage over those that do not. The UK just made a serious bet. The quantum era is being built at the national policy level now.

@NaorisProtocol silent but deadly

@NaorisProtocol read more

@NaorisProtocol @Reuters gm naoris

As I’ve been saying, if crypto is not quantum-safe within the next few years, it is game over for a large part of the industry. Not because quantum breaks “crypto” as an idea, but because it breaks the ownership assumptions underneath it. Wallets. Signatures. Custody. Bridges. Exchanges. Long-lived assets. The entire digital asset stack still relies heavily on cryptography built for a classical computing world, including elliptic curve systems that trace back to the 1980s. Quantum changes that foundation. Now @Reuters is covering what many still want to treat as a future issue. It is not future. The migration has to happen before the threat becomes practical, because once public keys are exposed and quantum capability arrives, there is no clean reset button. The winners of the next era will be the networks that take this seriously before they are forced to. Quantum-safe is not a feature. It's survival. reuters.com/legal/governme…

@NaorisProtocol @ethereum gm naoris

@NaorisProtocol they need quantom

@NaorisProtocol the new era

@NaorisProtocol 🫡

Can @ethereum, @solana, and other blockchains just flip a switch to post-quantum? No. They cannot. Post-quantum is not an upgrade. It is a structural change to the foundation the chain was built on. Here is why that matters 🧵

@NaorisProtocol lets on it

@NaorisProtocol gnao

@onchainantonio

To build silicon-based quantum computers, you need an ultra-pure form of silicon called silicon-28. Until now, production was concentrated among a small group of overseas suppliers. That was a strategic gap in China's quantum hardware supply chain. As of June 15, China's state-owned nuclear corporation announced it had achieved independent mass production of silicon-28 at 99.99% isotopic purity. The first domestic production at this scale. This matters because supply chain independence is a prerequisite for scaling quantum computing hardware. China has now removed a critical dependency. The quantum race is not just about algorithmic capability. It is about who can manufacture the hardware at scale, independently, without relying on supply chains that could be restricted. China just answered a question that has been open for years. The infrastructure of the quantum era is being built now, at the materials level, not just the software level.

@onchainantonio @ethereum alot of company is thinking if they build or wait for the attacker to prove that the old security safe or fixable