Annette Oliver @monkeymonk2012

The Thai Princess Bajrakitiyabha Mahidol has died, three years after her sudden collapse on Dec 14, 2022. Prof Bhakdi visited Thailand Dec 31, 2022. "She was perfectly well in the morning. This is very important" "After her 3rd shot, she collapsed" Not mycoplasma pneumonia.

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨 They dodge the laws they force on you. On us. The people! Do not take this lightly. Every MP is exempt. Every Lord is exempt. Every elite civil servant is exempt. EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT! They force the laws on us. They legally shield themselves. Total public surveillance. Total state secrecy. Absolute parasite immunity. The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy. If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way. 🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know! The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law. Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public. 1. The Divine Right of MPs The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016 The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister. The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable. 2. The Private Internet Loophole The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023 The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning. The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off. 3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments. The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote. 4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians. The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes. 💥 THE VERDICT This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque. They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it. 📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN) When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network). 🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act. 🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet. 💥 The Naked Truth Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened. Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress. Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you. FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers. So, what shall we do folks!? New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

Come and be the one who gets this to 10,000

Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath

a day ago

The petition to stop folic acid entering our flour is on 7,337 votes after three days. Please keep sharing with friends and family. If we kept up the current rate we could reach the target by the end of July. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7695…

115 2K 2K 71K 160

Under the UN policy of replacement immigration, any atrocity committed by a Muslim or foreigner against White people is immediately and officially denied as an act of terrorism. In accordance with this policy, the attempted murder and beheading this week of a Belfast man by a Sudanese Muslim, Hadi Alodid, has been officially denied as a terrorist attack; just as the murder and attempted beheading of English girls in Southport in July 2024 by a Rwandan Muslim, Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, wa also denied as a terrorist attack. This was despite the fact that the latter owned a pdf file titled ‘Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants: The Al-Qaeda Training Manual’, which the police subsequently identified as likely to be used by someone preparing to commit an act of terrorism. Despite the fact that police also found in Radakubana’s family home evidence of the production of a biological toxin called ‘ricin’, which, as a terrorism agent, can be used as a powder, a mist, a pellet, or dissolved in water or weak acid. And despite the fact that police and social services had compiled a recorded history going back to 2019 of Radakubana declaring his intention to kill his White classmates. Under the Islamisation of Britain and the influence of the Muslim Council of Britain (itself a front for the Muslim Brotherhood) on our government, councils, police forces and media, acts of Islamic terrorism are instead attributed to the psychological disorders of lone actors who just happen to be Muslims, even if they screamed ‘Allahu Akbar!’ as they committed their atrocities against always and exclusively White British people. This isn’t two-tier policing: this is perverting the course of justice by a corrupt criminal system that needs to be dismantled from top to bottom, from the Justice Minister, Secret Services and National Police Chiefs’ Council to the UK courts and police forces, all of which are covering up, denying and failing in their duties to protect the British people from, the impact of the policy of replacement immigration. It is up to the British people, therefore, to acquaint ourselves with the details of these attacks — which the UK media refuses to report, often under injunctions by UK courts — and to decide for ourselves whether they are acts of Islamic terrorism obeying the injunctions of Islam to kill non-Muslim people in their own homelands: ‘Kill them wherever you come upon them’ (Qur’an, 2:191); ‘Fight those who do not believe in Allah’ (); ‘Kill the polytheists wherever you find them’ (9:5). In accordance with this policy of denial and cover-up, which in Islamic doctrine is called kitmān, in the wake of the Islamic terrorist attack in Belfast it is the sharing of the footage of the attempted beheading of the Irish man on social media by a Muslim immigrant, rather than the immigration policy that has flooded Britain with these Islamic terrorists, that is being condemned by the UK government, media and the woke-Left. The details of the Belfast attack by the Sudanese terrorist, Hadi Alodid, are not yet available, but those of the even more brutal Southport attack by the Rwandan terrorist, Axel Radakubana, are. The details of this attack are harrowing, and I copy them here with this warning to readers; but I believe we must face these horrors if we are to understand the extent of the hatred of White British people that has been inculcated in immigrants to these Isles by the allied ideologies of Islam and woke, the current impact of that racial and religious hatred on the safety of the British people, and the even worse impact it will have in the future. These are the Sentencing Remarks of the High Court judge, Mr. Justice Goose, who presided over the trial of Axel Radakubana (Regina v. Axel Rudakubana, Courts and Tribunals Judiciary, 2025): ‘Elsie Stancombe was aged only 7 when Rudakubana inflicted at least 85 sharp force injuries to her head, face, neck, torso and upper limbs; severe force was used to cause her death. ‘Bebe King was aged only 6 when he inflicted at least 122 sharp force injuries to her head, face, neck, torso and upper limbs. It was the opinion of Dr. Cieka, the Pathologist, that Rudakubana had tried to decapitate her. He concluded that severe force was used to kill her. ‘Alice Da Silva Aguiar was aged 9 when he stabbed her, including a chop wound to her head and four stab wounds to her back, causing substantial internal injury. Although she managed to escape out of the building, she collapsed, and despite all medical help, she died in hospital at 1.20am the following day. ‘Child 1 was aged 7. She almost managed to escape, but Rudakubana were seen to pull her back into the building and attack her. Stabbing her 32 times, including 23 to her back and arms, causing her life-threatening injuries. Fortunately, she survived, and could be seen on CCTV collapsing outside. ‘Child 2, who was aged 10, was stabbed eight times, once to the front of her chest and six deep wounds to her back before she managed to escape. ‘Child 3 was aged 9 and was stabbed three times in the back, causing fractures to her shoulder blade, a rib and undisplaced fractures to two spinal vertebrae, caused with severe force. She managed to escape. ‘Child 4 was aged 8 and was stabbed four times to her back and another to her left arm, before she escaped. ‘Child 5 was aged 10. She was caused life-threatening injuries from two deep stab wounds to the back of her chest and substantial internal bleeding before she escaped. Her injuries necessitated the removal of her spleen as well as a blood transfusion. ‘Child 6, aged 13, whose Victim Personal Statement was read by her bravely during this hearing, also required a blood transfusion to replace the major loss of blood caused by two stab wounds. One was to her right shoulder and her back, causing life-threatening internal injury. Also, she suffered fractures to two of her spinal vertebrae. Severe force was used to cause those injuries with the knife before she escaped. ‘Child 7, who is the younger sister of Child 2, was also a victim of this attack. She had a single stab wound to her back which reached her spine but fortunately didn’t cause damage to it. She managed to escape despite her injury. Child 8 was aged 7 and suffered a deep wound to her arm and a laceration to her chin before she escaped. ‘Leanne Lucas was one of the adult organisers of the party and was looking after all of the children. As she tried to save as many children as she could, Rudakubana attacked her also. She did all she could before escaping, but suffered five stab wounds to her head, neck, back, shoulder blade and arm. She required a blood transfusion. She also suffered fractures to a spinal vertebrae, a rib and shoulder blade, all caused by severe force. ‘Jonathan Hayes was an adult working in a different part of the upstairs to the building. After he heard the disturbance, he went out to see what had happened and was attacked with the knife. Rudakubana stabbed him in the leg, causing a deep wound, as he tried to kill him. He was only saved when another witness appeared. ‘In just under 15 minutes Rudakubana murdered 3 children, attempted to murder 8 other children and also 2 adults. He was prevented from murdering more only by the escape of the other children. ‘In his home the police discovered clear evidence of a settled intention to carry out mass killing. On one of his computers were files proving that he had a long-standing preoccupation with violent killing and genocide. Of particular significance were copies of an Al-Qaeda training manual, which described methods of killing with a knife and where to attack the victim. Part of it referred to attacking the head and neck, just as he had done to some of the victims in this case. ‘Also, the manual provided instruction on how to produce Ricin, a highly dangerous toxin, which can cause multiple deaths and has no known antidote. I am sure that he had followed those instructions, because the police found in his bedroom the materials to produce Ricin and a pulp residue within a container. That was examined by an expert in chemical and biological warfare agents, Dr. Martin Pearce, and confirmed it was Ricin pulp and castor oil. His opinion was that there was sufficient Ricin pulp, that with some further purification process it would have provided a range of up to 1,269 doses, which would cause death if inhaled. ‘I am satisfied that for some time he had planned to kill as many people as he could, as the prosecution have called it “a mass killing”. He bought the knife he wanted to use, which had a particularly sharp point; he had read information on how to stab people with greatest effect to kill them; he saw the publicity for a children’s party in Southport at The Hart Space Dance Studio and decided to kill as many as he could, targeting very young children. I am also satisfied that if he hadn’t decided that way of killing, in time he was likely to use the Ricin he had produced.’ The people who don’t believe that this or the attempted beheading in Belfast was a religiously-motivated attack by an Islamic terrorist are either Muslims who will deny and cover up the crimes of their fellow jihadists no matter what atrocities they commit, or Britons so indoctrinated by woke that they believe these children and every other White person in Britain should be sacrificed in attonement for some hazy notion of the sins of Empire according to the woke notion of White guilt. Both sets of people are religious fundamentalists in thrall to irrational and hate-filled dogma whose ultimate objective is the genocide of the White race. Followers of this dogma, whether Islam or woke, are either terrorists or terrorist sympathisers. Both are enemies of the British people. The question is, what are we, the British people, going to do about the members of this alliance? Given they have the protection of state institutions that refuse to protect us from them, how can we live among murderers, rapists and terrorists who have taken control of every level of the UK state? How do we protect our children, women and ourselves from their violence and the infiltration of their genocidal ideologies into every aspect of British life? And how, sooner rather than later, do we rid our country of them? Because if we don’t, they will most certainly rid our country of us.

If you, or someone you love, has cancer, B12 deficiency, kidney dialysis or a stent you need to know they they must now avoid ALL white flour. They also need to check wholemeal and even gluten free products which also contain folic acid. Sign this petition to stop it being mandated in flour: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7695…

chunk @fuxachechunk

12 hours ago

@ClareCraigPath

2 7 16 32K 9

How a £1-an-acre trick is quietly handing Britain's industrial commons to AI companies, and why nobody has connected the dots until now. My new essay on the Anthropic/Teesside data centre deal, the Paris AI Summit walkout, and why the UK's "free zones" programme is quietly sabotaging any future return to the EU. Please subscribe, and support my research. open.substack.com/pub/europeanpo… 1/8

1/ THE TEESSIDE DEAL: Two businessmen got the right to buy public land for £1/acre in 2021. The public body that owns it spent £450m+ cleaning it up. This month, they sell 222 acres to Anthropic for £222m. That's a roughly 1,000x markup, captured almost entirely by two men.

@EuropeanPowell Doesn’t Rishi Sunak work for Anthropic? Uncovered by Private Eye. Lives in the area but not in the actual Freeport area. Some shenanigans with the two business men owning the electricity supply or something as well.

When Grok is cornered in a debate, it just goes silent. It had to go silent when trying to defend adding folic acid to flour. Sign the petition to stop this: petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7695…

Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath

14 hours ago

@grok @DIY_Tardis The charts are USA data. Try again.

3 0 21 6K 2

@InTheTrenchesUK @EarsBrainMouth They might be delivering dental appointments but they can’t get proper dentists to work for practices. Dental therapists maybe but they only do checkups, cleans and fillings. Untreated dental issues can quickly lead to sepsis and only then will the hospital see you.

My dear Stephen, How terribly delightful to see you once again waddling into the arena, that gloriously bald dome of yours catching the light like a freshly polished egg. The son of Neil Kinnock, the man who turned Labour into an unelectable laughing stock, still desperately clinging to daddy's dusty legacy like a balding, entitled little limpet who never learned to stand on his own two feet. You claim "we're delivering" 2.5 million dentist appointments. Bless your heart. You are not delivering anything. You are announcing. You are promising. You are counting chickens that will not hatch for a decade while your constituents pull their own teeth out with pliers today. Dental school places? Future promises. The "biggest sustained increase since 2007"? Labour's own 2007 baseline, Stephen. How wonderfully convenient. The British Dental Association calls your numbers fantasy. Practices are closing. Dentists are leaving the NHS. Your "reforming dental contract" is a press release, not a policy. By the time your promised dentists graduate, there will be no NHS dentistry left to save. But do carry on posting, pet. Eighty-five likes. Forty-five retweets. The nation is simply overwhelmed by your delivery.

Stephen Kinnock @SKinnock

a day ago

We're delivering 2,500,000 more NHS dentist appointments - and the biggest sustained increase in dental school places since 2007, with a dental school in every region. Lots done, lots more to do on NHS Dentistry - incl. reforming dental contract - but we're making progress.

815 168 473 90K 5

Here is the reality behind the claim of the amazing new breast cancer genetic test...

The Daily Sceptic @LD_Sceptics

a day ago

The breast cancer 'breakthrough' is a story of overtreatment, not a triumph of testing, says Dr Clare Craig. The truth is, the genetic test failed, but it's being rolled out anyway. dailysceptic.org/2026/06/11/the…

1 11 23 5K 6

I think Tracey in Hereford is over the target. It’s happening in Australia too.

REMEMBER: FREE ZONES ARE FRAGILE The enterprise zone network looks formidable, billions in investment, cross-party support, 25-year contracts, physical infrastructure, legal protections. But it’s built on foundations that can be challenged. Zones depend on: Public money (which can be withdrawn): Every zone subsidy is a political choice. Governments can choose differently. Public legitimacy (which can be challenged): Once people understand what zones are, support evaporates. The model survives through obscurity. Political protection (which can be voted out): Politicians enable zones. Different politicians can disable them. Legal frameworks (which can be contested): The legal structures enabling zones are challengeable in courts. Community acquiescence (which can be transformed into resistance): Zones assume communities won’t organize. Prove them wrong. The fragility is real. A single successful legal challenge can undermine an entire zone model. A single high-profile exposure can shift public opinion. A single election fought on zone accountability can change the political calculus. A single community successfully resisting can inspire dozens more. The Stakes This isn’t about tweaking policy. It’s about whether Britain will be a democracy or a corporate archipelago, whether public money serves public purposes or private profit, whether communities control their own development or are developed by distant corporations, whether workers have rights or are simply inputs to be optimized. The enterprise zone network is systematic, comprehensive, and intentional. But it’s not inevitable. Expose them. Challenge them. Organize against them. The alternative is a Britain where everything exists primarily to generate corporate profit, where democracy is theatre, where regions compete to offer the lowest wages and weakest protections, where public institutions serve private interests, and where resistance is structurally impossible because corporate power is embedded in physical infrastructure with 25-year contracts. That’s not levelling up. That’s not growth. That’s not even capitalism as normally understood. The window for resistance is closing. But it hasn’t closed yet. Start with one action. Then another. Connect with others doing the same. Build from there. Because the only thing more powerful than billions in corporate subsidy is organized communities that refuse to be bought. The Corporate Carve-Up of Britain: 12 Actions to Fight Back Against Enterprise Zones substack.com/@europeanpowel…

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Don't forget to consult your GP before you next eat a sandwich, croissant, pie etc. That's government advice? Have they thought this through?

Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath

a day ago

Can someone inform the government they are mass medicating the population with a product the advise people to avoid? How on earth did we get here? questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questi…

46 471 844 23K 56

The petition to stop folic acid entering our flour is on 7,337 votes after three days. Please keep sharing with friends and family. If we kept up the current rate we could reach the target by the end of July. petition.parliament.uk/petitions/7695…

Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of 'Crisis' a bit more So... an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched. The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added ... “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”... INTERCHANGEABLY? It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define 'harmful' This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a 'crisis'. And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content. Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works.... hoping you won't even notice.

@IssyMil @JamesMelville @KGoaman Why indeed. Turns out the data centre planned at Teesside Freeport’s by an American company has Rishi Sunak on the payroll, he who wanted to go a live in Florida…..follow the money, always

@SimonElmer2022 @JChimirie66677 Thank you, I look forward to buying it, I found your other books very informative as no doubt this one will be as well.

Without it having been officially declared, I believe the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is now, in effect and in different degrees, under Sharia law. Once we realise this, or at least accept it as a possibility, the actions of the UK Government, Parliament, Home Office, Foreign Office, Mayors of London and Manchester, Border Force, police forces, law courts, councils, media, education and culture industries stop being incomprehensible — which is what they have been for some time to the vast majority of the British people — and all make perfect, if still impossible to believe, sense. But what is Sharia? Sharia is an Arabic word that means ‘way’ or ‘path’, and refers to a body of religious law based on the scriptures of Islam, and in particular on the Qur’an, which was dictated in the early-Seventh Century by the illiterate Arabian warlord and prophet, Abu al-Qasim Muhammad; but also on the Hadith, which refers to anecdotes about and statements made by Muhammad and his followers; and on the Sunnah, which records the traditions and practices of Muhammad that constitute a model for Muslims to follow. This includes, preminently, his marriage to a 6-year-old girl and rape of her when she was 9 years old. As a result, there is, for instance, no age of consent for marriage or sex under Sharia law, just as there is no legal category of rape. But Islam is not only its so-called ‘holy’ books and the laws derived from them. Every time a Muslim rapes another British woman or knifes another British child or beheads another British man we are subject to wall-to-wall media coverage of Muslims telling us that rape and murder are contrary to the teachings of the Qur’an. As numerous quotations from this manual for the conquest and enslavement of non-Muslim peoples will confirm, they most certainly are not; but the British people have little interest in the correct interpretation of the dogma of Islam. Our interest is in how that dogma is used in practice both in countries already conquered by Islam and to justify the criminal, violent and obscene behaviour of Muslims in countries undergoing conquest. Countries like Britain. The model for, and source of, the Islamisation of Britain is Pakistan — or, to give the state its full name, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. This is one of the 50 countries in the world in which the majority of the population is Muslim; one of the 48 states (including Muslim-minority countries) in which Sharia plays some role in the legal system; one of the 17 in which Islam is the State Religion; one of 8 that is an Islamic State; and the one country from which the majority of the Muslims living in and emigrating to Britain — nearly 2 million — have come. With 235 million people and 96.3% of the population following Islam, Pakistan has the second largest Muslim population of any country in the world. As a result, Pakistan is now one of 13 countries (the others are Afghanistan, Bahrain, Brunei, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Mauritania, parts of Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen) in which Sharia is applied not only to family law (that is, overseeing marriage, divorce, custody of children, inheritance, etc.) but also to criminal law. In Sharia criminal courts, a Muslim woman’s testimony is worth half that of a Muslim man or disregarded altogether, and Hudud punishments (for crimes against Allah) include floggings for apostasy, refusing to pray, consumption of alcohol, extra-marital sex or homosexuality, amputations for theft and the stoning to death of women for adultery. The Islamisation of Britain, however, extends well beyong the infiltration of Sharia into UK laws and its enforcement (most blatantly in two-tier policing and sentencing according to race and religion, whereby a Pakistani Muslim child rapist receives a lesser sentence than the Britain who protests against their crimes) and reaches into our politics, our civil society and our social and cultural practices. Perhaps more important than whether or not the British people are ready to believe — even now — that Britain is already under Sharia law, a poll commissioned in 2024 by the Henry Jackson Society, a US national security think tank, found that 32% of Muslims living in Britain today expressed a desire for Sharia law to be implemented in the UK within the next 20 years, and the same percentage wanted Islam to be declared the national religion of Britain. The British people, in other words, who have been indoctrinated into self-hatred and national loathing by 30 years and more of propaganda, may not think Britain is being Islamised, but millions of Muslims living in Britain think it is, and under current UK immigration policy millions more will be joining them. This doesn’t mean that Sharia laws have been formally incorporated into UK law, which is not how Islam, historically, goes about conquering non-Muslim countries far more powerful than the countries of the invading population. This is a far slower and more subtle process. Even in Pakistan — which is now categorised as an ‘authoritarian’ state, ranked among the 10 worst countries in the word for democracy, and in which the government operates under the de facto control of the military — the relationship between Sharia and the court system is incomplete and above all subject to the corruption of unqualified and corrupt judges. In 1991, the Islamic State of Pakistan made into law the Enforcement of Sharia Act. This made Sharia the supreme law of Pakistan. As a consequence, new legislation, like the Punjab Protection of Women against Violence Act 2016, were challenged for being against the injunctions of Islam. Similarly, the Domestic Violence Bill 2020 could not be passed due to opposition from religious political parties and the Council for Islamic Ideology. While blasphemy laws passed under the military dictatorship of Zia ul-Haq, who ruled Pakistan between 1977 and 1988, could not be repealed despite repeated calls to do so from civil society. Equally, homicide has been brought back under Qisas (retaliatory) and Diyat (compensatory) laws, which makes murder, rather than being a public offence against the state, a private offence against the victim and their families, who can seek blood money. Under such retaliatory justice, families have employed murderers to commit so-called ‘honour-killings’ of women in their own family with legal impunity. In one case, village elders ordered the rape of a 17-year-old girl after her brother was accused of raping another girl. These are the same ‘elders’ through whom UK police now obediently communicate with the Muslim diaspora in Britain. Under Sharia law, it is women and girls who are punished for the crimes of men. Indeed, in 2003 the National Commission on the Status of Women in Pakistan reported that as many as 88% of women imprisoned in Pakistan were victims of rape or gang rape who were unable to provide the required four male witnesses, under Sharia law, to prove they were raped, and had therefore been convicted of unlawful sex (zinā). The Enforcement of Sharia Act 1991, in other words, has acted as an effective and insuperable barrier to the liberalisation and democratisation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. This, it seems to me, tells us something about the similar but, at present, less advanced process of Islamisation in the UK, and why it is that Islam has been promoted as the ideology of the former nation states of Europe that have been so effectively dismantled by forty years of neoliberalism and the ideology of woke, and are now all but defenceless against the new political economy of stakeholder capitalism by which we are governed in the West. Islam — which the British people rightly associate with religious fundamentalism, cultural barbarity, misogyny, military dictatorship, human rights abuses, ‘honour’ killings, child rape and terrorism — is the ideology we are now expected to accept and embrace and not to oppose on pain of charges of racism, Islamophobia and our arrest for hate speech. Unless we stop this, not with protests and marches and other out-of-date and useless spectacles of a democratic consensus that doesn’t exist but with revolutionary political action that will criminalise Islam as a terrorist ideology and deport every Muslim from Britain, there will come a time, soon, when the trafficking of our children in cages as sex slaves to Pakistan, the rape of our women on the street by gangs of Muslim men, and the beheading of our men by African savages, will not only become the norm it almost already is, but will be sanctioned under Sharia law, and anyone protesting against or opposing it will be arrested under its injunctions. The sectarian dungeon of Pakistan and the barbarous savagery of the Sudan is an image of our future in Britain, unless . . .