🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️ @moRMod22

@GonBernardos Si lo votaron dos veces, algo idiotas somos.

@pitiklinov @VNMachine Confundes condicionamiento con determinismo

@pitiklinov No Pablo. Nuestra conciencia es capaza de deliberar sobre lo que creemos. No se nos imponen sin más. Otra cosa es que estemos situados en un mundo donde las creencias posibles estén delimitadas al igual que los criterios. Pero eso no nos hace tragar con todo.

Bueno recién mí mamá me acaba de decir que argentina si hizo gol ella lo vio Aparte antes tuvo una predicción con el gol de argentina con Inglaterra y ahora me dice que vio los goles 💀 en que momento que carajo pasa loco

@el_pais Sobre todo si su lenguaje impone el uso obligado de pronombres fantásticos o llamar a las mujeres "personas sangrantes".

La FIFA y Mamdani quisieron que todos vieran a una niña prepúber envuelta en un hijab. Bien amaestrada en asumir que la responsabilidad por la violencia que pudiera recibir de varones adultos si exhibiera provocativamente su melena al viento es de ella y solo de ella.

de donde han sacado a la selección argentina? del módulo de sicarios de la cárcel de buenos aires?

@el_pais Vaya 💩 gorda

@LauraFreixas Para nada es lo que piensas. La noticia está escrita de manera que intenta mostrar que se puede combatir el fraude de ley en la “ley trans”. Esa periodista no da punto sin hilo. Y lopais sigue siendo transactivista.

Amnesty is no longer the organisation that defended all who were persecuted for their freedom of speech. It has become a self-appointed, vainglorious policeman of wrongthink. It tweets out ideological slogans. It demonises those who disagree with those slogans. It intervened in FWS v Scottish Ministers, on the side of those determined to keep men in women’s prisons and rape crisis centres. Some of us haven’t forgotten that Amnesty stopped supporting the since-murdered prisoner of conscience Alexei Navalny because they deemed he’d said unacceptable things in the past. They reversed that decision due to public backlash, exactly as they withdrew the recent defamatory report, before I or anyone else had responded to it, because they panicked on seeing the reaction. A cynic might think they changed their minds on both occasions, not on principle, but because they were afraid of losing money. You cannot be simultaneously an impartial defender of freedom and speech and a wealthy international witch hunter that publicly vilifies and intimidates small campaigning groups with whom you disagree. As for ‘silencing’ Amnesty, I have neither the power nor the desire to do so. I want them to explain as loudly and extensively as possible why they are using their might and formerly lustrous reputation to attack small non-violent campaigning organisations with legally protected beliefs.

I can't believe this is real. The Chancellor of UC San Francisco testified under oath that a "vast majority of pregnancies are in women." Implying some pregnancies occur in men. When asked directly whether a non-biological woman has ever had a baby, he refused to answer. This is the head of one of the top medical schools in the country.

1/ A new article in @Ecology_Letters by a group of evolutionary biologists—pioneers and leading experts on the evolution of sex. (The article is open access, short, and clear.) "Biological sex is best defined as a binary classification of male and female reproductive strategies rooted in anisogamy, characterised by the production of two discrete gamete types of different sizes." "We call for a more differentiated discourse on sex, one that separates the scientific conception of biological sex from societal discussions regarding the diversity of gender expressions and identities in humans." onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/el…

Amnesty have written to people saying “We regret ‘A growing threat: the anti-rights movement in the UK’ briefing was uploaded to our website without going through the established internal review processes that are in place to ensure consistency, accuracy and alignment with Amnesty International UK's positions. It's use of language does not reflect the position of Amnesty International UK which is why it was promptly removed.” “We remain committed to defending human rights, including both the rights of women and the rights of trans people.” This is insulting double-speak.

What happened to Amnesty International? - spiked spiked-online.com/2026/07/12/wha…

Two weeks before Amnesty International released a report attacking women’s advocacy and LGB organisations as “anti-rights”, I interviewed its director about the impact of gender ideology on women and girls. Here’s the full interaction.

@DarinaMarty Me pregunto cómo explica la reproducción sin la distinción hombre-mujer. Debe de haber muchas cigüeñas en Nigeria.

@electo_mania La pregunta del millón de toda la vida del señor. Por qué hay "fachapobres". La respuesta es que quién se la pregunta no se entera de nada (y Rufián es muy cortito, de ahí que lo único que puede ejercer es la demagogia barata)

@JotDownSpain Dice que el ataque a las ideas ilustradas viene de los nuevos reaccionarios. Pero, en qué mundo vive: es toda la nueva izquierda woke la que las denigras. Y claro, lo jueces que no dejan robar al poder o saltarse leyes básicas, son los malos. A pastar.

@jesusmarana @danilareq

@MeteoElpito