the funniest part of Tarantino's ten movie limit is that it's based on some Classic Hollywood guys who got worse in age, meanwhile many of our modern masters (Spielberg, Scorsese, Lynch, Miller, Cameron, Miyazaki, etc) continue doing incredible work without breaking a sweat
This was not an invitation to tell me you don’t like any of these filmmakers recent work or that you for some reason don’t know that TWIN PEAKS: THE RETURN exists
@metaplexmovies Great call If he has the energy and he sure seems to Come out and announce its 10 +10 Imagine the hype 🍿
@metaplexmovies Spielberg’s stuff after the mid 2000s is mediocre at best
@metaplexmovies Spielberg, Cameron, Lynch, all did much superior work earlier in their careers. For Scorcese, Flower Moon was good, but doesnt compare to his 70's-80's-90's classics. Same goes for other greats like Eastwood and Kubrick. Tarantino wants a near perfect filmography.
@metaplexmovies He wants to make 10 bangers and then move on to novels and screenplays/theater and explore other ventures. I respect it
@metaplexmovies David lynch hasn’t made a movie in two decades. I love David lynch, I am confused why I keep seeing his name brought up to dunk on tarentino
@metaplexmovies I think he's looking at the wrong directors:
@metaplexmovies Same with musicians, painters and writers. But it's less about a specific number, and more about a certain "flow" you get into in your career, where you're performing at your highest level and can practically do no wrong. And it can happen at any stage, early or late.
@metaplexmovies I would argue the difference is Tarantino is a writer/director so he has to come up with something original most of the time.
@metaplexmovies I wouldn’t called Spielberg’s recent work incredible