#MathsTutor @mathsoluxion

This was the most deplorable conduct by Arendse today. He was not leading evidence of the witness but decided to attack Phahlane in defence of O’Sullivan. His continued presence as the evidence leader undermines the integrity of the Committee. HE MUST GO!!!

@Sentletse @grok has advocate Arendse ever represented Robert McBride in any case? Please provide clarity on the matter if it exist, Moja m-Grok-isto usaqalaza

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary Soon I'll be a teenager...kudala sigudla

If indeed it is a correct categorization, and it is accepted as such, that we are coming from the so-called “9 wasted years” or the “State Capture years” under the Zuma presidency or the ANC-led 5th government administration, then we must also be honest enough to apply the same objective and political lens to where we find ourselves now. Because the truth is, we are sitting in what is almost a full decade of a presidency; the 6th and now the 7th government administration under President Ramaphosa, that many people, whether we like it or not, have already started to define in equally harsh and uncomfortable terms. For some, and maybe even for many, this period is shaping up to be remembered as “The Decade of Managed Decline”, or “The New Dawn of Slow Collapse”, or “The Presidency of Paralysis”, or even “The Lost Years of the New Dawn”. Others simply call it “The Era of State Paralysis.” Would that be fair of them to categorize this period as such?

BATOHI’S 7 WASTED YEARS AT NPA “A national director is not expected to read the entirety of dockets before he/she comes to a decision in a matter.” — Adv. Batohi • Lies, lies, lies • Spin, spin, spin • Deny, deny, deny • Secret meetings • Does not read NPA dockets • Missing minutes from meetings • Missing emails Scary as it is, the irony is that what she started has become a measure of her fitness to lead the NPA, albeit far too late. People have lost their jobs because of this utter incompetence, while Batohi has continued to collect easy money. Badimo ba Advocate Chauke are dealing with people.

@SizweLo Nonsense our people are employed. They will take any job. Any job is better than R350. Our people will replace those workers.

On the first point, it is true that illegal immigrants spend their earnings in local businesses, but natives not occupying those jobs also spend what little they have there. In simple terms, both pay VAT. However, the advantage of native employees is that, as citizens, they pay both VAT and income tax. Illegal immigrants are unregistered, so they do not pay taxes; even if tax is withheld as ghost workers, that money can easily be corrupted since they are not registered in the country. Secondly, it would not involve cutting jobs but replacing illegals with legals, allowing them to spend earnings within the country while paying both VAT and tax. Since most unemployed in SA receive grants, this could relieve the government from social grant payouts and redirect funds elsewhere. Lastly, employing illegal immigrants over natives creates tensions and violence, as natives feel abandoned by their government.

What happens when you deport large numbers of illegal immigrants? There’s a difference between what people think will/should/might happen and what actually happens

Dear Africans, dear lovers of my Africa...

@SundownsXtra_ @grok help us, is this true or just his opinion?

ATT @OCJ_RSA To: The Honorable Chief Justice Mandisa Maya Office of the Chief Justice Republic of South Africa Subject: Request for Judicial Intervention and Review of the Unconstitutional Sealing of the CR17 Bank Statements Dear Chief Justice Maya, I hope this message finds you in perfect health and strength as you continue to guide our judiciary with integrity and fairness. I write to you on behalf of millions of South Africans who remain deeply concerned about the continued sealing of the CR17 campaign bank statements , an act that, in our respectful view, stands contrary to the principles of openness, accountability, and the rule of law enshrined in our Constitution. Section 165(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 vests judicial authority in the courts, requiring them to uphold constitutional supremacy and safeguard public confidence in the administration of justice. Section 165(4) further mandates organs of state to assist and protect the courts to ensure their independence, impartiality, dignity, accessibility, and effectiveness. Section 173 of the Constitution empowers the superior courts to protect and regulate their own process and to develop the common law, taking into account the interests of justice. Similarly, Section 8 of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 obliges the Chief Justice to ensure that the administration of justice conforms to the norms and standards of openness and accessibility. It is our respectful submission that the sealing of the CR17 bank statements — effected through an administrative letter signed by then Deputy Judge President Aubrey Ledwaba — was neither based on judicial proceedings nor on a court order issued in accordance with the Uniform Rules of Court, Rule 62(7), or any lawful provision allowing blanket secrecy over public-interest documents. The open-justice principle, affirmed by the Constitutional Court in Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd v Minister for Intelligence Services 2008 (5) SA 31 (CC), establishes that court documents should be accessible to the public unless exceptional circumstances justify confidentiality. No such exceptional grounds have been established in this matter. In light of the above, we therefore call upon your esteemed office as the administrative head of the judiciary to urgently: 1. Review the legality of the administrative act that resulted in the sealing of the CR17 records; 2. Ensure that the principles of transparency, fairness, and legality as required by Section 1(c) (the rule of law) and Section 34 (the right to a public hearing) of the Constitution are upheld; and 3. Facilitate, where appropriate, the unsealing of these records in accordance with the public’s constitutional right of access to information as set out in Section 32 of the Constitution and the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (PAIA). It took a mere letter to conceal the truth from the public; this letter , representing millions of South Africans ,now serves to restore the public’s faith in justice. We trust that your leadership will ensure that our judiciary remains a beacon of constitutional accountability. With the highest respect and faith in the courts of our Republic, Yours sincerely, On behalf South Africans

@Kgosetsile @Mokone_Dimphoo @OCJ_RSA The population of Mzansi as at 09:53 today, noma ungathatha your whole family... y'all are a drop in the ocean...

@iDiskiTimes @grok how many goals did Hlompo Kekana score against chicken in? In your own words, do you think that was his way of "respect the opponent"?

@MbalulaFikile "until the lion learns how to write, every story will glorify the hunter" less powerful vs powerful with resources...

@BafanaBafana @SABC_Sport @flysaa @10bet_ZA @CastleLagerSA @HonorAfrica @SAFA_net @Shield_ZA @pefmo_za @NUTRITECHFIT @SouthernSunGrp No Bradley Grobler again!!! kazi wanenzani

@grok @robertmarawa @GaytonMcK Was there a need to apologize especially since we were docked points and our goal difference was affected? Is it in his powers to ask Danny for a report as a minister or is he overreaching?

@KennyTM78 @KaizerChiefs youtube.com/@KaizerChiefsF… this one does exist kodwa nothing will be broadcast there...

Jacob Zuma would have been crucified, white people would have been on the road chanting how he must go, the newspapers & news channels all over him. But CYRIL????? They’re quiet about CYRIL.

@ThatoEastside @BafanaBafana @SABC_Sport @flysaa @10bet_ZA @CastleLagerSA @SAFA_net @pefmo_za @NUTRITECHFIT @SouthernSunGrp @HonorAfrica @Shield_ZA Badminton team, yeah...not soccer, awavumi amakhosi